Michael Xiaoliang Tong1, Alana Hansen2, Scott Hanson-Easey3, Jianjun Xiang4, Scott Cameron5, Qiyong Liu6, Xiaobo Liu7, Yehuan Sun8, Philip Weinstein9, Gil-Soo Han10, Craig Williams11, Peng Bi12. 1. School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia. Electronic address: michael.tong@adelaide.edu.au. 2. School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia. Electronic address: alana.hansen@adelaide.edu.au. 3. School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia. Electronic address: scott.hanson-easey@adelaide.edu.au. 4. School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia. Electronic address: jianjun.xiang@adelaide.edu.au. 5. School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia. Electronic address: scott.cameron@adelaide.edu.au. 6. State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China. Electronic address: liuqiyong@icdc.cn. 7. State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China. Electronic address: liuxiaobo@icdc.cn. 8. Department of Epidemiology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China. Electronic address: sun611007@163.com. 9. School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia. Electronic address: philip.weinstein@adelaide.edu.au. 10. Communications & Media Studies, School of Media, Film and Journalism, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia. Electronic address: gil-soo.han@monash.edu. 11. School of Pharmacy & Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia. Electronic address: craig.williams@unisa.edu.au. 12. School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia. Electronic address: peng.bi@adelaide.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dengue fever is an important climate-sensitive mosquito-borne viral disease that poses a risk to half the world's population. The disease is a major public health issue in China where in 2014 a major outbreak occurred in Guangdong Province. This study aims to gauge health professionals' perceptions about the capacity of infectious disease control and prevention to meet the challenge of dengue fever in the face of climate change in Guangdong Province, China. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was administered among staff in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCs) in Guangdong Province. Data analysis was undertaken using descriptive methods and logistic regression. RESULTS: In total, 260 questionnaires were completed. Most participants (80.7%) thought climate change would have a negative effect on population health, and 98.4% of participants reported dengue fever had emerged or re-emerged in China in recent years. Additionally, 74.9% of them indicated that the capability of the CDCs to detect infectious disease outbreak/epidemic at an early stage was excellent; 86.3% indicated laboratories could provide diagnostic support rapidly; and 83.1% believed levels of current staff would be adequate in the event of a major outbreak. Logistic regression analysis showed higher levels of CDCs were perceived to have better capacity for infectious disease control and prevention. Only 26.8% of participants thought they had a good understanding of climate change, and most (85.4%) thought they needed more information about the health impacts of climate change. Most surveyed staff suggested the following strategies to curb the public health impact of infectious diseases in relation to climate change: primary prevention measures, strengthening the monitoring of infectious diseases, the ability to actively forecast disease outbreaks by early warning systems, and more funding for public health education programs. CONCLUSION: Vigilant disease and vector surveillance, preventive practice and health promotion programs will likely be significant in addressing the threat of dengue fever in the future. Further efforts are needed to strengthen the awareness of climate change among health professionals, and to promote relevant actions to minimize the health burden of infectious diseases in a changing climate. Results will be critical for policy makers facing the current and future challenges associated with infectious disease prevention and control in China.
BACKGROUND: Dengue fever is an important climate-sensitive mosquito-borne viral disease that poses a risk to half the world's population. The disease is a major public health issue in China where in 2014 a major outbreak occurred in Guangdong Province. This study aims to gauge health professionals' perceptions about the capacity of infectious disease control and prevention to meet the challenge of dengue fever in the face of climate change in Guangdong Province, China. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was administered among staff in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCs) in Guangdong Province. Data analysis was undertaken using descriptive methods and logistic regression. RESULTS: In total, 260 questionnaires were completed. Most participants (80.7%) thought climate change would have a negative effect on population health, and 98.4% of participants reported dengue fever had emerged or re-emerged in China in recent years. Additionally, 74.9% of them indicated that the capability of the CDCs to detect infectious disease outbreak/epidemic at an early stage was excellent; 86.3% indicated laboratories could provide diagnostic support rapidly; and 83.1% believed levels of current staff would be adequate in the event of a major outbreak. Logistic regression analysis showed higher levels of CDCs were perceived to have better capacity for infectious disease control and prevention. Only 26.8% of participants thought they had a good understanding of climate change, and most (85.4%) thought they needed more information about the health impacts of climate change. Most surveyed staff suggested the following strategies to curb the public health impact of infectious diseases in relation to climate change: primary prevention measures, strengthening the monitoring of infectious diseases, the ability to actively forecast disease outbreaks by early warning systems, and more funding for public health education programs. CONCLUSION: Vigilant disease and vector surveillance, preventive practice and health promotion programs will likely be significant in addressing the threat of dengue fever in the future. Further efforts are needed to strengthen the awareness of climate change among health professionals, and to promote relevant actions to minimize the health burden of infectious diseases in a changing climate. Results will be critical for policy makers facing the current and future challenges associated with infectious disease prevention and control in China.
Authors: Jinghong Gao; Guozhang Xu; Wenjun Ma; Yong Zhang; Alistair Woodward; Sotiris Vardoulakis; Sari Kovats; Paul Wilkinson; Tianfeng He; Hualiang Lin; Tao Liu; Shaohua Gu; Jun Wang; Jing Li; Jun Yang; Xiaobo Liu; Jing Li; Haixia Wu; Qiyong Liu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Michael Xiaoliang Tong; Alana Hansen; Scott Hanson-Easey; Jianjun Xiang; Scott Cameron; Qiyong Liu; Xiaobo Liu; Yehuan Sun; Philip Weinstein; Gil-Soo Han; Peng Bi Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 4.634