Literature DB >> 27088474

How Do Recurrent and First-Ever Strokes Differ in Rehabilitation Outcomes?

Yee Sien Ng1, Kristin Hui Xian Tan, Cynthia Chen, Gilmore Cura Senolos, Gerald Choon Huat Koh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical characteristics and functional outcomes in recurrent stroke, identify factors associated with improved outcomes, and to compare these outcomes with first-ever stroke patients.
DESIGN: Five-year prospective cohort study of 1277 consecutive stroke patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation, with 16.6% recurrent stroke. Primary functional outcome measure was the Functional Independence Measure. FIM gain quantified the difference between admission and discharge FIM scores. FIM effectiveness measured the percentage recovery.
RESULTS: In recurrent stroke patients, mean AdmissionFIM and DischargeFIM scores were 62.5 and 74.2, respectively, with a mean FIM gain of 11.7 and FIM effectiveness of 20.4%. Comparing to first-ever stroke, recurrent stroke patients were older, had higher unemployment rates, higher proportion of ischemic stroke types, and higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and depression. In multivariate analysis of the entire cohort, recurrent stroke predicted lower FIM gains and effectiveness. When the recurrent stroke group was further sub-analyzed, better FIM gain was associated with higher cognitive AdmissionFIM scores and presence of a caregiver, whereas better FIM effectiveness was correlated with higher motor AdmissionFIM scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent stroke patients made less functional gains compared to first-ever stroke patients. However, improvements were still significant and these patients should be offered comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation to optimize outcomes. TO CLAIM CME CREDITS: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME CME
OBJECTIVES: : Upon completion of this article, the learner will be able to: (1) Describe unique demographics, and characteristics of recurrent stroke patients admitted for inpatient rehabilitation; (2) Differentiate functional outcomes between first-ever and recurrent stroke patients; and (3) Utilize factors associated with functional improvements in recurrent strokes in treatment planning. LEVEL: Advanced ACCREDITATION: : The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this activity for a maximum of 1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27088474     DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  3 in total

1.  Functional Recovery Patterns of Hemorrhagic and Ischemic Stroke Patients Under Post-Acute Care Rehabilitation Program.

Authors:  Chien-Hung Chang; Yu-Cheng Pei; Chan-Lin Chu; Yueh-Peng Chen; Carl C P Chen; Chih-Kuang Chen; Hsiang-Ning Chang
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.570

2.  Is the proportional recovery rule applicable to the lower limb after a first-ever ischemic stroke?

Authors:  Janne M Veerbeek; Caroline Winters; Erwin E H van Wegen; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Availability of secondary prevention services after stroke in Europe: An ESO/SAFE survey of national scientific societies and stroke experts.

Authors:  A Webb; M R Heldner; D Aguiar de Sousa; E C Sandset; G Randall; Y Bejot; B van der Worp; V Caso; U Fischer
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2018-11-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.