Poorni M Manohar1, Lauren J Beesley2, Jeremy Mg Taylor2, Elizabeth Hesseltine3, Megan R Haymart3, Nazanene H Esfandiari3, David A Hanauer4, Francis P Worden5. 1. Department of internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 2. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States. 3. Department of Endocrinology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States. 4. Department of Computational Medicine and Bioformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States. 5. Department of Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We hypothesize that the combination of an mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus, with a well-known cytotoxic agent, cyclophosphamide, provides a well-tolerated and promising alternative treatment for advanced, differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC). METHODS: This retrospective review extracted data from patients treated for advanced DTC at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center from 1995 through 2013. Fifteen patients treated with combination sirolimus and cyclophosphamide were identified as the sirolimus+cyp group. Seventeen patients treated with standard of care and enrolled in clinical trials were identified as the comparison group. RESULTS: The one-year progression free survival rate (PFS) was 0.45, 95% CI [0.26, 0.80] in the sirolimus+cyp population and 0.30, 95% CI [0.13, 0.67] in the comparison population. The hazard ratio for PFS from initiation of treatment was 1.47, 95% CI [0.57, and 3.78]. In patients treated as first line, one-year PFS rate was 0.57, 95% CI [0.30, 1.00] in the sirolimus+cyp group and relatively unchanged at 0.29, 95% CI [0.11, 0.74] in the comparison group. The hazard ratio for PFS for first line patients was 1.10, 95% CI[ 0.4, and 3.5]. In patients with 3 or fewer sites of metastases, the one year PFS was 0.58, 95% CI [0.33, 1.00] in the sirolimus+cyp group, and 0.37, 95% CI [0.17, 0.80] in the comparison group. The average number of toxicities was 0.87 in the sirolimus+cyp patients and 1.71 in the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of sirolimus and cyclophosphamide was generally well tolerated with similar progression free survival, highlighting its applicability in patients with limited options.
BACKGROUND: We hypothesize that the combination of an mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus, with a well-known cytotoxic agent, cyclophosphamide, provides a well-tolerated and promising alternative treatment for advanced, differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC). METHODS: This retrospective review extracted data from patients treated for advanced DTC at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center from 1995 through 2013. Fifteen patients treated with combination sirolimus and cyclophosphamide were identified as the sirolimus+cyp group. Seventeen patients treated with standard of care and enrolled in clinical trials were identified as the comparison group. RESULTS: The one-year progression free survival rate (PFS) was 0.45, 95% CI [0.26, 0.80] in the sirolimus+cyp population and 0.30, 95% CI [0.13, 0.67] in the comparison population. The hazard ratio for PFS from initiation of treatment was 1.47, 95% CI [0.57, and 3.78]. In patients treated as first line, one-year PFS rate was 0.57, 95% CI [0.30, 1.00] in the sirolimus+cyp group and relatively unchanged at 0.29, 95% CI [0.11, 0.74] in the comparison group. The hazard ratio for PFS for first line patients was 1.10, 95% CI[ 0.4, and 3.5]. In patients with 3 or fewer sites of metastases, the one year PFS was 0.58, 95% CI [0.33, 1.00] in the sirolimus+cyp group, and 0.37, 95% CI [0.17, 0.80] in the comparison group. The average number of toxicities was 0.87 in the sirolimus+cyppatients and 1.71 in the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of sirolimus and cyclophosphamide was generally well tolerated with similar progression free survival, highlighting its applicability in patients with limited options.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Marcia S Brose; Christopher M Nutting; Barbara Jarzab; Rossella Elisei; Salvatore Siena; Lars Bastholt; Christelle de la Fouchardiere; Furio Pacini; Ralf Paschke; Young Kee Shong; Steven I Sherman; Johannes W A Smit; John Chung; Christian Kappeler; Carol Peña; István Molnár; Martin J Schlumberger Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Caroline S Kim; Vasily V Vasko; Yasuhito Kato; Michael Kruhlak; Motoyasu Saji; Sheue-Yann Cheng; Matthew D Ringel Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2005-07-07 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Martin Schlumberger; Makoto Tahara; Lori J Wirth; Bruce Robinson; Marcia S Brose; Rossella Elisei; Mouhammed Amir Habra; Kate Newbold; Manisha H Shah; Ana O Hoff; Andrew G Gianoukakis; Naomi Kiyota; Matthew H Taylor; Sung-Bae Kim; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Corina E Dutcus; Begoña de las Heras; Junming Zhu; Steven I Sherman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 91.245