| Literature DB >> 27087821 |
QiaoYu Jiang1, Jue Li2, GuangHua Wang3, Jing Wang4.
Abstract
Objective. We report on the distribution of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) constitution in the first trimester and on the association between TCM constitution and maternal symptoms related to pregnancy. Methods. Participants were followed up until delivery to observe primary measures (gestational hypertension and gestational diabetes mellitus) and secondary measures (signs of miscarriage, miscarriage, nausea and vomiting, and sleepiness and defecation during pregnancy). Descriptive analysis, t-tests, chi-square tests, and logistic regression analysis were used in this study. Results. 61.8% of the participants had unbalanced constitutions. We did not find a significant association between the TCM constitution and gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, miscarriage, signs of miscarriage, and defecation during pregnancy. And we found that women with unbalanced constitutions in early pregnancy had a greater likelihood of severe nausea and vomiting and poor sleep during pregnancy in the logistic regression analysis. Conclusions. These results have implications for female health care providers and policy makers. Identification of TCM constitution may be helpful for understanding nausea and vomiting and poor sleepiness during pregnancy, especially in the condition that can not be explained by modern medical science, and be helpful for making program to improve these uncomfortable symptoms.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27087821 PMCID: PMC4818819 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3901485
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Study profile.
The 75 g OGTT thresholds for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes.
| Definitive test | Fasting 2-hour 75 g oral |
|---|---|
| Fasting threshold | ≥92 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L) |
| 1-hour threshold | ≥180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L) |
| 2-hour threshold | ≥153 mg/dL (8.5 mmol/L) |
Figure 2The distribution of the TCM constitutions in early pregnancy.
Baseline characteristics of the balanced and unbalanced constitution groups.
| Variable | Constitution group |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced ( | Unbalanced ( | |||
| Family registered in Shanghai (yes), | 69 (76.7) | 110 (75.49) | 0.02 | 0.89 |
| Prior pregnancy (yes), | 22 (24.4) | 35 (24.1) | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Prior adverse pregnancy outcomes (yes), | 5 (5.6) | 16 (11.0) | 2.05 | 0.15 |
| Irregular menstrual cycle (yes), | 12 (13.3) | 21 (14.5) | 0.06 | 0.81 |
| Medication (yes), | 16 (17.8) | 21 (14.5) | 0.45 | 0.50 |
| Anemia (yes), | 11 (12.2) | 13 (9.0) | 0.64 | 0.42 |
| Thyroid disease (yes), | 4 (4.4) | 4 (2.8) | 0.49# | |
| Heart disease (yes), | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.7) | 1.00# | |
| Gum bleeding (yes), | 32 (36.0) | 55 (38.2) | 0.12 | 0.73 |
| Aversions to meat/egg (yes), | 1 (1.1) | 7 (4.9) | 0.16# | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Preferences for raw meat (yes), | 4 (4.4) | 6 (4.2) | 1.00# | |
| Smoke (yes), | 2 (2.2) | 3 (2.1) | 1.00# | |
| Drink (yes), | 0 (0.0) | 3 (2.1) | 0.29# | |
| Prenatal risk (yes), | 17 (18.9) | 37 (25.5) | 1.38 | 0.24 |
| Dysmenorrheal, | 2.69 | 0.26 | ||
| Much | 11 (12.2) | 22 (15.2) | ||
| Moderate | 43 (47.8) | 80 (55.2) | ||
|
|
|
| ||
| Much | 5 (5.6) | 15 (10.3) | ||
| Moderate | 49 (54.4) | 102 (70.3) | ||
|
|
|
| ||
| Much | 1 (1.1) | 8 (5.5) | ||
| Moderate | 35 (38.9) | 74 (51.0) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Defecation during prepregnancy | 0.20 | 0.65 | ||
| Good | 84 (93.3) | 133 (91.7) | ||
| Moderate | 6 (6.7) | 12 (8.3) | ||
| Poor | 0 | 0 | ||
| Sleepiness during prepregnancy | 0.92 | 0.34 | ||
| Good | 62 (68.9) | 91 (62.8) | ||
| Moderate | 28 (31.1) | 54 (37.2) | ||
| Poor | 0 | 0 | ||
| Age (year), mean ± SD | 28.55 ± 2.68 | 28.23 ± 2.80 | 0.89 | 0.38 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD | 21.28 ± 2.82 | 20.62 ± 2.34 | 1.88 | 0.06 |
| SBP (mmHg), mean ± SD | 108.0 ± 9.75 | 106.4 ± 11.15 | 1.11 | 0.27 |
| DBP (mmHg), mean ± SD | 68.75 ± 7.14 | 67.64 ± 6.89 | 0.18 | 0.24 |
Note: data are presented as n (%) and χ 2-value for categorical variables and mean ± SD and t-value for continuous variables.
#Fisher's exact test; no women felt much stress from interpersonal relationship; six months before pregnancy.
Primary observations evaluated by the chi-square test.
| Variable | Constitution group |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced ( | Unbalanced ( | |||
| Gestational hypertension (yes), | 2 (2.3) | 1 (0.7) | 0.56# | |
| Gestational diabetes (yes), | 3 (3.5) | 13 (9.2) | 2.68 | 0.10 |
# p value of Fisher's exact test.
The secondary observations assessed by the chi-square test.
| Variable | Constitution group |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced ( | Unbalanced ( | |||
|
|
|
| ||
| None | 35 (38.9) | 27 (18.6) | ||
| <1 week | 15 (16.7) | 32 (22.1) | ||
| 1 week-2 weeks | 29 (32.2) | 64 (44.1) | ||
| >2 weeks | 11 (12. 2) | 22 (15.2) | ||
| Sign of miscarriage (yes), | 18 (20.5) | 27 (18.9) | 0.09 | 0.77 |
| Miscarriage (yes), | 4 (4.4) | 4 (2.8) | 0.49# | |
|
|
|
| ||
| Good | 67 (77.9) | 86 (61.0) | ||
| Moderate | 19 (22.1) | 50 (35.5) | ||
| Poor | 0 (0.0) | 5 (3.6) | ||
| Defecation during pregnancy, | 0.52 | 0.47 | ||
| Good | 73 (84.9) | 115 (81.6) | ||
| Moderate | 12 (14.0) | 23 (16.3) | ||
| Poor | 1 (1.2) | 3 (2.1) | ||
# p value of Fisher's exact test; value of Mantel-Haenszel chi-square.
The logistic models of nausea and vomiting and sleep during pregnancy.
| Variables |
| SE | Wald |
| OR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Job stress | 0.36 | 0.32 | 1.24 | 0.27 | 1.43 | (0.76, 2.70) |
| Interpersonal relationship stress | 0.45 | 0.41 | 1.18 | 0.28 | 1.56 | (0.59, 2.13) |
| Economic stress | 0.11 | 0.33 | 0.12 | 0.73 | 2.58 | (0.70, 3.49) |
| Aversions to vegetable | 0.36 | 0.28 | 1.79 | 0.18 | 2.08 | (0.71, 6.07) |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Job stress | −0.08 | 0.31 | 0.07 | 0.79 | 0.92 | (0.50, 1.70) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Economic stress | −0.35 | 0.32 | 1.23 | 0.27 | 0.70 | (0.38, 1.31) |
| Aversions to vegetable | 0.55 | 0.31 | 3.19 | 0.07 | 3.01 | (0.90, 10.08) |
Model 1: nausea and vomiting influencing diet are the dependent variable.
Model 2: sleepiness during pregnancy is the dependent variable.