Literature DB >> 27087322

Biallelic BRCA2 Mutations Shape the Somatic Mutational Landscape of Aggressive Prostate Tumors.

Brennan Decker1, Danielle M Karyadi2, Brian W Davis2, Eric Karlins2, Lori S Tillmans3, Janet L Stanford4, Stephen N Thibodeau3, Elaine A Ostrander5.   

Abstract

To identify clinically important molecular subtypes of prostate cancer (PCa), we characterized the somatic landscape of aggressive tumors via deep, whole-genome sequencing. In our discovery set of ten tumor/normal subject pairs with Gleason scores of 8-10 at diagnosis, coordinated analysis of germline and somatic variants, including single-nucleotide variants, indels, and structural variants, revealed biallelic BRCA2 disruptions in a subset of samples. Compared to the other samples, the PCa BRCA2-deficient tumors exhibited a complex and highly specific mutation signature, featuring a 2.88-fold increased somatic mutation rate, depletion of context-specific C>T substitutions, and an enrichment for deletions, especially those longer than 10 bp. We next performed a BRCA2 deficiency-targeted reanalysis of 150 metastatic PCa tumors, and each of the 18 BRCA2-mutated samples recapitulated the BRCA2 deficiency-associated mutation signature, underscoring the potent influence of these lesions on somatic mutagenesis and tumor evolution. Among all 21 individuals with BRCA2-deficient tumors, only about half carried deleterious germline alleles. Importantly, the somatic mutation signature in tumors with one germline and one somatic risk allele was indistinguishable from those with purely somatic mutations. Our observations clearly demonstrate that BRCA2-disrupted tumors represent a unique and clinically relevant molecular subtype of aggressive PCa, highlighting both the promise and utility of this mutation signature as a prognostic and treatment-selection biomarker. Further, any test designed to leverage BRCA2 status as a biomarker for PCa must consider both germline and somatic mutations and all types of deleterious mutations.
Copyright © 2016 The American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27087322      PMCID: PMC4863563          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  50 in total

1.  Deficiency of human BRCA2 leads to impaired homologous recombination but maintains normal nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  F Xia; D G Taghian; J S DeFrank; Z C Zeng; H Willers; G Iliakis; S N Powell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Gross chromosomal rearrangements and genetic exchange between nonhomologous chromosomes following BRCA2 inactivation.

Authors:  V P Yu; M Koehler; C Steinlein; M Schmid; L A Hanakahi; A J van Gool; S C West; A R Venkitaraman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps.

Authors:  J C Barrett; B Fry; J Maller; M J Daly
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  J K Moore; J E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 5.  Lessons learned from BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  L Zheng; S Li; T G Boyer; W H Lee
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2000-12-11       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Absence of Brca2 causes genome instability by chromosome breakage and loss associated with centrosome amplification.

Authors:  A Tutt; A Gabriel; D Bertwistle; F Connor; H Paterson; J Peacock; G Ross; A Ashworth
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1999-10-07       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Synergistic tumor suppressor activity of BRCA2 and p53 in a conditional mouse model for breast cancer.

Authors:  J Jonkers; R Meuwissen; H van der Gulden; H Peterse; M van der Valk; A Berns
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-08-04       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  The frequency of germ-line mutations in the breast cancer predisposition genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 in familial prostate cancer. The Cancer Research Campaign/British Prostate Group United Kingdom Familial Prostate Cancer Study Collaborators.

Authors:  S A Gayther; K A de Foy; P Harrington; P Pharoah; W D Dunsmuir; S M Edwards; C Gillett; A Ardern-Jones; D P Dearnaley; D F Easton; D Ford; R J Shearer; R S Kirby; A L Dowe; J Kelly; M R Stratton; B A Ponder; D Barnes; R A Eeles
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples.

Authors:  Kristian Cibulskis; Michael S Lawrence; Scott L Carter; Andrey Sivachenko; David Jaffe; Carrie Sougnez; Stacey Gabriel; Matthew Meyerson; Eric S Lander; Gad Getz
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  13 in total

1.  Leveraging premalignant biology for immune-based cancer prevention.

Authors:  Avrum Spira; Mary L Disis; John T Schiller; Eduardo Vilar; Timothy R Rebbeck; Rafael Bejar; Trey Ideker; Janine Arts; Matthew B Yurgelun; Jill P Mesirov; Anjana Rao; Judy Garber; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Differential Response to Olaparib Treatment Among Men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 Versus ATM Mutations.

Authors:  Catherine H Marshall; Alexandra O Sokolova; Andrea L McNatty; Heather H Cheng; Mario A Eisenberger; Alan H Bryce; Michael T Schweizer; Emmanuel S Antonarakis
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Somatic Mutations in Prostate Cancer: Closer to Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  M J Alvarez-Cubero; L J Martinez-Gonzalez; I Robles-Fernandez; J Martinez-Herrera; G Garcia-Rodriguez; M Pascual-Geler; J M Cozar; J A Lorente
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 4.  Genomic Profiling of Prostate Cancer: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Koji Hatano; Norio Nonomura
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 6.494

5.  Biological and clinical evidence for somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 as predictive markers for olaparib response in high-grade serous ovarian cancers in the maintenance setting.

Authors:  Brian A Dougherty; Zhongwu Lai; Darren R Hodgson; Maria C M Orr; Matthew Hawryluk; James Sun; Roman Yelensky; Stuart K Spencer; Jane D Robertson; Tony W Ho; Anitra Fielding; Jonathan A Ledermann; J Carl Barrett
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-04

6.  Pan-cancer analysis reveals technical artifacts in TCGA germline variant calls.

Authors:  Alexandra R Buckley; Kristopher A Standish; Kunal Bhutani; Trey Ideker; Roger S Lasken; Hannah Carter; Olivier Harismendy; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 7.  Role of BRCA Mutations in Cancer Treatment with Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitors.

Authors:  Isabella Faraoni; Grazia Graziani
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  A systematic review of the prevalence of DNA damage response gene mutations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shona H Lang; Stephanie L Swift; Heath White; Kate Misso; Jos Kleijnen; Ruben G W Quek
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 5.650

9.  Mutations in BRCA2 and taxane resistance in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Cathleen Nientiedt; Martina Heller; Volker Endris; Anna-Lena Volckmar; Stefanie Zschäbitz; María A Tapia-Laliena; Anette Duensing; Dirk Jäger; Peter Schirmacher; Holger Sültmann; Albrecht Stenzinger; Markus Hohenfellner; Carsten Grüllich; Stefan Duensing
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The whole-genome landscape of medulloblastoma subtypes.

Authors:  Paul A Northcott; Ivo Buchhalter; A Sorana Morrissy; Volker Hovestadt; Joachim Weischenfeldt; Tobias Ehrenberger; Susanne Gröbner; Maia Segura-Wang; Thomas Zichner; Vasilisa A Rudneva; Hans-Jörg Warnatz; Nikos Sidiropoulos; Aaron H Phillips; Steven Schumacher; Kortine Kleinheinz; Sebastian M Waszak; Serap Erkek; David T W Jones; Barbara C Worst; Marcel Kool; Marc Zapatka; Natalie Jäger; Lukas Chavez; Barbara Hutter; Matthias Bieg; Nagarajan Paramasivam; Michael Heinold; Zuguang Gu; Naveed Ishaque; Christina Jäger-Schmidt; Charles D Imbusch; Alke Jugold; Daniel Hübschmann; Thomas Risch; Vyacheslav Amstislavskiy; Francisco German Rodriguez Gonzalez; Ursula D Weber; Stephan Wolf; Giles W Robinson; Xin Zhou; Gang Wu; David Finkelstein; Yanling Liu; Florence M G Cavalli; Betty Luu; Vijay Ramaswamy; Xiaochong Wu; Jan Koster; Marina Ryzhova; Yoon-Jae Cho; Scott L Pomeroy; Christel Herold-Mende; Martin Schuhmann; Martin Ebinger; Linda M Liau; Jaume Mora; Roger E McLendon; Nada Jabado; Toshihiro Kumabe; Eric Chuah; Yussanne Ma; Richard A Moore; Andrew J Mungall; Karen L Mungall; Nina Thiessen; Kane Tse; Tina Wong; Steven J M Jones; Olaf Witt; Till Milde; Andreas Von Deimling; David Capper; Andrey Korshunov; Marie-Laure Yaspo; Richard Kriwacki; Amar Gajjar; Jinghui Zhang; Rameen Beroukhim; Ernest Fraenkel; Jan O Korbel; Benedikt Brors; Matthias Schlesner; Roland Eils; Marco A Marra; Stefan M Pfister; Michael D Taylor; Peter Lichter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.