A Majumdar1,2, M T Kitson1, S K Roberts1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia. 2. UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health and Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The burden of HCV cirrhosis is high and projected to increase significantly over the next decade. While interferon therapy is problematic in HCV cirrhosis, the era of direct-acting anti-viral (DAA) therapy provides effective treatment for patients with cirrhosis. AIM: To systematically review the results of DAA therapy to date in patients with HCV cirrhosis, and highlight the ongoing challenges for DAA therapy in this population. METHODS: A structured Medline search was conducted to obtain phase II and III HCV trials in patients with cirrhosis. Citations from review articles were cross-referenced and conference abstracts from EASL and AASLD liver meetings for the preceding 3 years were reviewed manually. Keywords used included hepatitis C, cirrhosis and the DAA's: sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, velpatasvir, grazoprevir, elbasvir, daclatasvir, beclabuvir, asunaprevir, simeprevir, paritaprevir, ombitasvir and dasabuvir. RESULTS: Successful direct-acting anti-viral treatment is now possible in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis including those with liver decompensation with several regimens now offering sustained virological response (SVR) of 90-95%. Overall success rates in GT1 cirrhosis are excellent while GT3-infected patients with cirrhosis remain hard to cure. The pangenotypic combination of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir holds promise for GT3 cirrhosis achieving SVR of ~90%. CONCLUSIONS: Potent DAA therapies provide much needed, safe and highly effective treatment options for persons with HCV cirrhosis including those previously deemed unsuitable for treatment. Combination therapy with two or more classes of drug is essential to achieve high efficacy and minimise viral resistance, with the role of ribavirin still under evaluation. However, several challenges remain including the hard-to-cure groups of GT3 cirrhosis and direct-acting anti-viral failures, and managing drug-drug interactions.
BACKGROUND: The burden of HCV cirrhosis is high and projected to increase significantly over the next decade. While interferon therapy is problematic in HCV cirrhosis, the era of direct-acting anti-viral (DAA) therapy provides effective treatment for patients with cirrhosis. AIM: To systematically review the results of DAA therapy to date in patients with HCV cirrhosis, and highlight the ongoing challenges for DAA therapy in this population. METHODS: A structured Medline search was conducted to obtain phase II and III HCV trials in patients with cirrhosis. Citations from review articles were cross-referenced and conference abstracts from EASL and AASLD liver meetings for the preceding 3 years were reviewed manually. Keywords used included hepatitis C, cirrhosis and the DAA's: sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, velpatasvir, grazoprevir, elbasvir, daclatasvir, beclabuvir, asunaprevir, simeprevir, paritaprevir, ombitasvir and dasabuvir. RESULTS: Successful direct-acting anti-viral treatment is now possible in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis including those with liver decompensation with several regimens now offering sustained virological response (SVR) of 90-95%. Overall success rates in GT1cirrhosis are excellent while GT3-infectedpatients with cirrhosis remain hard to cure. The pangenotypic combination of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir holds promise for GT3 cirrhosis achieving SVR of ~90%. CONCLUSIONS: Potent DAA therapies provide much needed, safe and highly effective treatment options for persons with HCV cirrhosis including those previously deemed unsuitable for treatment. Combination therapy with two or more classes of drug is essential to achieve high efficacy and minimise viral resistance, with the role of ribavirin still under evaluation. However, several challenges remain including the hard-to-cure groups of GT3 cirrhosis and direct-acting anti-viral failures, and managing drug-drug interactions.
Authors: M P Economides; P Mahale; A Kyvernitakis; F Turturro; H Kantarjian; A Naing; J Hosry; T L Shigle; A Kaseb; H A Torres Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Erik Mogalian; Diana M Brainard; Anu Osinusi; Lisa Moorehead; Bernard Murray; Kah Hiing John Ling; Robert Perry; Craig Curtis; Eric Lawitz; Kenneth Lasseter; Thomas Marbury; Anita Mathias Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Joel S Emery; Magdalena Kuczynski; Danie La; Saeed Almarzooqi; Matthew Kowgier; Hemant Shah; David Wong; Harry L A Janssen; Jordan J Feld Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Massimo Andreoni; Sergio Babudieri; Savino Bruno; Massimo Colombo; Anna L Zignego; Vito Di Marco; Giovanni Di Perri; Carlo F Perno; Massimo Puoti; Gloria Taliani; Erica Villa; Antonio Craxì Journal: Infection Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 3.553
Authors: Stacey B Prenner; Lisa B VanWagner; Steven L Flamm; Riad Salem; Robert J Lewandowski; Laura Kulik Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 25.083