Literature DB >> 27086938

Identifying at diagnosis the vestibular schwannomas at low risk of growth in a long-term retrospective cohort.

J G Wolbers1, A H G Dallenga1, A van Linge2, M Te West1, E E Kummer3, A Méndez Romero4, B K H Pauw2, M H Wieringa2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Identification at time of diagnosis of those vestibular schwannomas that will not grow.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients diagnosed with a sporadic vestibular schwannoma that were entered in the wait-and-scan protocol.
SETTING: Academic referral centre. PARTICIPANTS: The study group contained 155 patients with a sporadic vestibular schwannoma first seen in the full 8-year period 2000-2007: continual wait-and-scan (n = 89) and initial wait-and-scan until intervention (n = 66). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tumour growth, defined as more than 2 mm linear difference in any plane between the diagnostic MRI-scan and the last available scan, was related to clinical parameters at diagnosis: localisation of the tumour (solely intracanalicular versus cisternal extension), sudden sensorineural hearing loss, sensorineural hearing loss longer than 2 years and vertigo/instability.
RESULTS: Hearing loss longer than 2 years and an entirely intracanalicular localisation were associated with no tumour growth by univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. Combining both factors at time of diagnosis resulted in a group with low risk of growth (n = 36, median follow-up of 6.2 years) with a Hazard Ratio for growth of 0.37 (95% CI, 0.19-0.69). This subgroup is about 25% of the wait-and-scan population. Thirty-one percent showed growth, while in the remaining higher risk group of 119 patients 62% showed growth. For the growing schwannomas, the median time for growth becoming manifest is 1.9 years after diagnostic MRI.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study on vestibular schwannoma patients that start in a wait-and-scan protocol, about a quarter may be set apart having a low risk for growth. These patients at diagnosis combine a history of hearing loss longer than 2 years and a fully intracanalicular schwannoma. They seem to be not needed yearly MRI checks.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27086938     DOI: 10.1111/coa.12661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


  4 in total

1.  In search of the most cost-effective monitoring strategy for vestibular schwannoma: A decision analytical modelling study.

Authors:  Mirre Scholte; Mayke A Hentschel; Gerjon Hannink; Henricus P M Kunst; Stefan C Steens; Maroeska M Rovers; Janneke P C Grutters
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.597

Review 2.  "Wait and scan" management of patients with vestibular schwannoma and the relevance of non-contrast MRI in the follow-up.

Authors:  Jing Zou; Timo Hirvonen
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2017-08-10

3.  Development of a model to predict vestibular schwannoma growth: An opportunity to introduce new wait and scan strategies.

Authors:  Mayke A Hentschel; Gerjon Hannink; Stefan C A Steens; Jef J S Mulder; Maroeska M Rovers; Henricus P M Kunst
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.597

4.  Decision making on vestibular schwannoma treatment: predictions based on machine-learning analysis.

Authors:  Oliver Profant; Zbyněk Bureš; Zuzana Balogová; Jan Betka; Zdeněk Fík; Martin Chovanec; Jan Voráček
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.