BACKGROUND: The whole blood extraction for liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) of simultaneous quantification of cyclosporine A (Cys A), tacrolimus (Tacrs), sirolimus (Siros), and everolimus (Evers) is still performed manually in many laboratories. The analytical results obtained with an automated method using a liquid handler versus a classical manual preparation were compared. METHODS: Cys A (n = 36), Tacrs (n = 50), Siros (n = 34), Evers (n = 38) whole blood samples of patients were analyzed by LC-MS/MS assay after manual preparation and automated process using a liquid handling platform including a centrifugation step. RESULTS: The comparison between manual and automated extraction investigated by a linear regression showed a high correlation between results [(Tacrs "automated") = 1.0927 × (Tacrs "manual") - 0.36; (Cys A "automated") = 1.0284 × (Cys A "manual") + 0.0312; (Siros "automated") = 0.9923 × (Siros "manual") + 0.4001; (Evers "automated") = 1.0000 × (Evers "manual") - 0.0600]. CONCLUSION: The results obtained by the automated and manual preparation are consistent. The automated method is applied for high-throughput therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs in routine practice, leading to an increase in quality.
BACKGROUND: The whole blood extraction for liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) of simultaneous quantification of cyclosporine A (Cys A), tacrolimus (Tacrs), sirolimus (Siros), and everolimus (Evers) is still performed manually in many laboratories. The analytical results obtained with an automated method using a liquid handler versus a classical manual preparation were compared. METHODS:Cys A (n = 36), Tacrs (n = 50), Siros (n = 34), Evers (n = 38) whole blood samples of patients were analyzed by LC-MS/MS assay after manual preparation and automated process using a liquid handling platform including a centrifugation step. RESULTS: The comparison between manual and automated extraction investigated by a linear regression showed a high correlation between results [(Tacrs "automated") = 1.0927 × (Tacrs "manual") - 0.36; (Cys A "automated") = 1.0284 × (Cys A "manual") + 0.0312; (Siros "automated") = 0.9923 × (Siros "manual") + 0.4001; (Evers "automated") = 1.0000 × (Evers "manual") - 0.0600]. CONCLUSION: The results obtained by the automated and manual preparation are consistent. The automated method is applied for high-throughput therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs in routine practice, leading to an increase in quality.
Authors: Gunnar Brandhorst; Michael Oellerich; Gregory Maine; Paul Taylor; Gerhard Veen; Pierre Wallemacq Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Eshwar Jagerdeo; Madeline A Montgomery; Marc A Lebeau; Martin Sibum Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2008-09-07 Impact factor: 3.205