| Literature DB >> 27086771 |
Ahmed Nassar1, Qiang Liu1, Kevin Farias1, Laura Buccini1, William Baldwin1, Ana Bennett1, Martin Mangino2, Samuel Irefin1, Jacek Cywinski1, Toshihiro Okamoto1, Teresa Diago Uso1, Giuseppe Iuppa1, Basem Soliman1, Charles Miller1, Cristiano Quintini3.
Abstract
Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has been introduced as a promising technology to preserve and possibly repair marginal liver grafts. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of temperature on the preservation of donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver grafts in an ex vivo perfusion model after NMP (38.5°C) and subnormothermic machine perfusion (SNMP, 21°C) with a control group preserved by cold storage (CS, 4°C). Fifteen porcine livers with 60 min of warm ischemia were preserved for 10 h by NMP, SNMP or CS (n = 5/group). After the preservation phase all livers were reperfused for 24 h in an isolated perfusion system with whole blood at 38.5°C to simulate transplantation. At the end of transplant simulation, the NMP group showed significantly lower hepatocellular enzyme level (AST: 277 ± 69 U/L; ALT: 22 ± 2 U/L; P < 0.03) compared to both SNMP (AST: 3243 ± 1048 U/L; ALT: 127 ± 70 U/L) and CS (AST: 3150 ± 1546 U/L; ALT: 185 ± 97 U/L). There was no significant difference between SNMP and CS. Bile production was significantly higher in the NMP group (219 ± 43 mL; P < 0.01) compared to both SNMP (49 ± 84 mL) and CS (12 ± 16 mL) with no significant difference between the latter two groups. Histologically, the NMP livers showed preserved cellular architecture compared to the SNMP and CS groups. NMP was able to recover DCD livers showing superior hepatocellular integrity, biliary function, and microcirculation compared to SNMP and CS. SNMP showed some significant benefit over CS, yet has not shown any advantage over NMP.Entities:
Keywords: Liver-Normothermic machine perfusion-Donation after cardiac death-Ex vivo
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27086771 DOI: 10.1111/aor.12699
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Artif Organs ISSN: 0160-564X Impact factor: 3.094