Literature DB >> 27086672

Inhibitory effects of heterotopic noxious counter-stimulation on perception and brain activity related to Aβ-fibre activation.

Nabi Rustamov1,2, Jessica Tessier1,2, Benjamin Provencher1,2, Alexandre Lehmann3,4, Mathieu Piché1,2.   

Abstract

Heterotopic noxious counter-stimulation (HNCS) inhibits pain and pain processes through cerebral and cerebrospinal mechanisms. However, it is unclear whether HNCS inhibits non-nociceptive processes, which needs to be clarified for a better understanding of HNCS analgesia. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of HNCS on perception and scalp somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). Seventeen healthy volunteers participated in two counter-balanced sessions, including non-nociceptive (selective Aβ-fibre activation) or nociceptive electrical stimulation, combined with HNCS. HNCS was produced by a 20-min cold pressor test (left hand) adjusted individually to produce moderate pain (mean ± SEM: 42.5 ± 5.3 on a 0-100 scale, where 0 is no pain and 100 the worst pain imaginable). Non-nociceptive electrical stimulation was adjusted individually at 80% of pain threshold and produced a tactile sensation in every subject. Nociceptive electrical stimulation was adjusted individually at 120% of RIII-reflex threshold and produced moderate pain (45.3 ± 4.5). Shock sensation was significantly decreased by HNCS compared with baseline for non-nociceptive (P < 0.001) and nociceptive (P < 0.001) stimulation. SEP peak-to-peak amplitude at Cz was significantly decreased by HNCS for non-nociceptive (P < 0.01) and nociceptive (P < 0.05) stimulation. These results indicate that perception and brain activity related to Aβ-fibre activation are inhibited by HNCS. The mechanisms of this effect remain to be investigated to clarify whether it involves inhibition of spinal wide-dynamic-range neurons by diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, supraspinal processes or both.
© 2016 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CPM; DNIC; brain activity; human; pain; tactile

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27086672     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  4 in total

Review 1.  Pain Modulation: From Conditioned Pain Modulation to Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Experimental and Clinical Pain.

Authors:  Janie Damien; Luana Colloca; Carmen-Édith Bellei-Rodriguez; Serge Marchand
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.230

2.  Effects of vasopressin on anesthetic response time and circulatory dynamics of lidocaine.

Authors:  Shoko Fujimori; Katsuhisa Sunada
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Event-related potentials evoked by skin puncture reflect activation of Aβ fibers: comparison with intraepidermal and transcutaneous electrical stimulations.

Authors:  Yui Shiroshita; Hikari Kirimoto; Tatsunori Watanabe; Keisuke Yunoki; Ikuko Sobue
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Exploring the Mechanisms of Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia Using Somatosensory and Laser Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Matthew D Jones; Janet L Taylor; John Booth; Benjamin K Barry
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.