BACKGROUND: The NOD/SCID mouse model is a unique and sophisticated method to study the survival of human platelets (PLTs) in vivo. Meanwhile, several research groups adopted this model to analyze a wide range of PLT antibodies. Differences exist between the research groups regarding the method of PLT injection, the amount and route of antibody injection, and the preparation of blood samples collected from the animal, making it difficult to compare results between studies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We compared the survival of human PLTs infused into NOD/SCID mice via the tail vein or the retro-orbital plexus. The percentage of circulating human PLTs in the mouse circulation was determined by flow cytometry. Murine blood samples were prepared using two different methods: 1) direct fixation of whole blood samples and 2) isolation of PLTs by density gradient centrifugation. RESULTS: Recovery of human PLTs after tail vein injection was comparable to retro-orbital injection (13% vs. 11% of all circulating PLTs, p = 0.401). However, the survival rate of tail vein-infused PLTs was higher than that of retro-orbitally injected PLTs (median PLT survival after 5 hr 84% vs. 56%, p = 0.025). Moreover, we observed that determination of circulating human PLTs in directly fixed murine whole blood samples shows better reproducibility compared to the density gradient centrifugation method. CONCLUSIONS: Tail vein injection of human PLTs into the NOD/SCID mice is superior to retro-orbital injection in terms of human PLT survival. Direct fixation of whole blood samples allows better reproducibility of results compared to the density gradient centrifugation method.
BACKGROUND: The NOD/SCIDmouse model is a unique and sophisticated method to study the survival of human platelets (PLTs) in vivo. Meanwhile, several research groups adopted this model to analyze a wide range of PLT antibodies. Differences exist between the research groups regarding the method of PLT injection, the amount and route of antibody injection, and the preparation of blood samples collected from the animal, making it difficult to compare results between studies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We compared the survival of human PLTs infused into NOD/SCIDmice via the tail vein or the retro-orbital plexus. The percentage of circulating human PLTs in the mouse circulation was determined by flow cytometry. Murine blood samples were prepared using two different methods: 1) direct fixation of whole blood samples and 2) isolation of PLTs by density gradient centrifugation. RESULTS: Recovery of human PLTs after tail vein injection was comparable to retro-orbital injection (13% vs. 11% of all circulating PLTs, p = 0.401). However, the survival rate of tail vein-infused PLTs was higher than that of retro-orbitally injected PLTs (median PLT survival after 5 hr 84% vs. 56%, p = 0.025). Moreover, we observed that determination of circulating human PLTs in directly fixed murine whole blood samples shows better reproducibility compared to the density gradient centrifugation method. CONCLUSIONS: Tail vein injection of human PLTs into the NOD/SCIDmice is superior to retro-orbital injection in terms of human PLT survival. Direct fixation of whole blood samples allows better reproducibility of results compared to the density gradient centrifugation method.