Literature DB >> 27086260

Assessment of Surgical Treatment Strategies for Moderate to Severe Cervical Spinal Deformity Reveals Marked Variation in Approaches, Osteotomies, and Fusion Levels.

Justin S Smith1, Eric Klineberg2, Christopher I Shaffrey3, Virginie Lafage4, Frank J Schwab4, Themistocles Protopsaltis5, Justin K Scheer6, Tamir Ailon3, Subaraman Ramachandran3, Alan Daniels7, Gregory Mundis8, Munish Gupta9, Richard Hostin10, Vedat Deviren11, Robert Eastlack8, Peter Passias5, D Kojo Hamilton12, Robert Hart13, Douglas C Burton14, Shay Bess5, Christopher P Ames15.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although previous reports suggest that surgery can improve the pain and disability of cervical spinal deformity (CSD), techniques are not standardized. Our objective was to assess for consensus on recommended surgical plans for CSD treatment.
METHODS: Eighteen CSD cases were assembled, including a clinical vignette, cervical imaging (radiography, computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging), and full-length standing radiography. Fourteen deformity surgeons (10 orthopedic, 4 neurosurgery) were queried regarding recommended surgical plans.
RESULTS: There was marked variation in treatment plans across all deformity types. Even for the least complex deformities (moderate midcervical apex kyphosis), there was lack of agreement on approach (50% combined anterior-posterior, 25% anterior only, 25% posterior only), number of anterior (range, 2-6) and posterior (range, 4-16) fusion levels, and types of osteotomies. As the kyphosis apex moved caudally (cervical-thoracic junction/upper thoracic spine) and for cases with chin-on-chest kyphosis, >80% of surgeons agreed on a posterior-only approach and >70% recommended a pedicle subtraction osteotomy or vertebral column resection, but the range in number of anterior (4-8) and posterior (4-27) fusion levels was exceptionally broad. Cases of cervical/cervical-thoracic scoliosis had the least agreement for approach (48% posterior only, 33% combined anterior-posterior, 17% anterior-posterior-anterior or posterior-anterior-posterior, 2% anterior only) and had broad variation in the number of anterior (2-5) and posterior (6-19) fusion levels, and recommended osteotomies (41% pedicle subtraction osteotomy/vertebral column resection).
CONCLUSIONS: Among a panel of deformity surgeons, there was marked lack of consensus on recommended surgical approach, osteotomies, and fusion levels for CSD. Further study is warranted to assess whether specific surgical treatment approaches are associated with better outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical; Deformity; Fusion; Kyphosis; Osteotomy; Spine; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27086260     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  10 in total

Review 1.  Adult cervical deformity: radiographic and osteotomy classifications.

Authors:  Bassel G Diebo; Neil V Shah; Maximillian Solow; Vincent Challier; Carl B Paulino; Peter G Passias; Renaud Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Han Jo Kim; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Utility of a Novel Biomimetic Spine Model in Surgical Education: Case Series of Three Cervicothoracic Kyphotic Deformities.

Authors:  Michael A Bohl; Sarah McBryan; U Kumar Kakarla; Jean-Christophe Leveque; Rajiv Sethi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-07-30

3.  Evaluating cervical deformity corrective surgery outcomes at 1-year using current patient-derived and functional measures: are they adequate?

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Samantha R Horn; Cheongeun Oh; Subaraman Ramchandran; Douglas C Burton; Virginie Lafage; Renaud Lafage; Gregory W Poorman; Leah Steinmetz; Frank A Segreto; Cole A Bortz; Justin S Smith; Christopher Ames; Christopher I Shaffrey; Han Jo Kim; Alexandra Soroceanu; Eric O Klineberg
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

4.  Comparison of Best Versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Han Jo Kim; Peter Passias; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Renaud Lafage; Gregory M Mundis; Eric Klineberg; Virginie Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Justin K Scheer; Michael Kelly; D Kojo Hamilton; Munish Gupta; Vedat Deviren; Richard Hostin; Todd Albert; K Daniel Riew; Robert Hart; Doug Burton; Shay Bess; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-08-16

5.  The impact of osteotomy grade and location on regional and global alignment following cervical deformity surgery.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Samantha R Horn; Tina Raman; Avery E Brown; Virginie Lafage; Renaud Lafage; Justin S Smith; Cole A Bortz; Frank A Segreto; Katherine E Pierce; Haddy Alas; Breton G Line; Bassel G Diebo; Alan H Daniels; Han Jo Kim; Alex Soroceanu; Gregory M Mundis; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Eric O Klineberg; Douglas C Burton; Robert A Hart; Frank J Schwab; Shay Bess; Christopher I Shaffrey; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

6.  Apoptosis of endplate chondrocytes in cervical kyphosis is associated with chronic forward flexed neck: an in vivo rat bipedal walking model.

Authors:  Jinliang Lai; Guanglin Ji; Yuqiao Zhou; Jincai Chen; Min Zhou; Jianwen Mo; Tiansheng Zheng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Predictive model for achieving good clinical and radiographic outcomes at one-year following surgical correction of adult cervical deformity.

Authors:  Peter Gust Passias; Samantha R Horn; Cheongeun Oh; Gregory W Poorman; Cole Bortz; Frank Segreto; Renaud Lafage; Bassel Diebo; Justin K Scheer; Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Robert Eastlack; Daniel M Sciubba; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Han Jo Kim; Robert A Hart; Virginie Lafage; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2021-09-08

8.  Neurological Complications and Recovery Rates of Patients With Adult Cervical Deformity Surgeries.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Yu-Cheng Yao; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Michael P Kelly; Munish Gupta; Todd J Albert; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Gregory M Mundis; Peter Passias; Eric Klineberg; Shay Bess; Virginie Lafage; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-23

9.  Limited morbidity and possible radiographic benefit of C2 vs. subaxial cervical upper-most instrumented vertebrae.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Cole A Bortz; Frank Segreto; Samantha Horn; Katherine E Pierce; Haddy Alas; Avery E Brown; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Justin S Smith; Breton Line; Robert Eastlack; Daniel M Sciubba; Eric O Klineberg; Alexandra Soroceanu; Douglas C Burton; Frank J Schwab; Shay Bess; Christopher I Shaffrey; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

Review 10.  Pathological Features and Surgical Strategies of Cervical Deformity.

Authors:  Xiangyao Sun; Siyuan Sun; Chao Kong; Wei Wang; Tongtong Zhang; Junzhe Ding; Xiangyu Li; Shibao Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.