Literature DB >> 27086181

Robotic versus Open Prostatectomy: End of the Controversy.

Michael O Koch1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27086181     DOI： 10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN： 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Surgical method influences specimen margins and biochemical recurrence during radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victor Srougi; Jose Bessa; Mohammed Baghdadi; Igor Nunes-Silva; Jose Batista da Costa; Silvia Garcia-Barreras; Eric Barret; Francois Rozet; Marc Galiano; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Xavier Cathelineau
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  The Preoperative Assessment and Optimization of Patients Undergoing Major Urological Surgery.

Authors:  Helen W Cui; Benjamin W Turney; John Griffiths
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Changes in intraocular pressure and optic nerve sheath diameter in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in steep 45° Trendelenburg position.

Authors:  Sebastian Blecha; Marion Harth; Felix Schlachetzki; Florian Zeman; Christiane Blecha; Pierre Flora; Maximilian Burger; Stefan Denzinger; Bernhard M Graf; Horst Helbig; Michael T Pawlik
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 4.  Open retropubic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ryan Pereira; Andre Joshi; Matthew Roberts; John Yaxley; Ian Vela
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

5.  Performing all major surgical procedures robotically will prolong wait times for surgery.

Authors:  Brian M Shinder; Nicholas J Farber; Robert E Weiss; Thomas L Jang; Isaac Y Kim; Eric A Singer; Sammy E Elsamra
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.