Literature DB >> 27086174

National spending on health by source for 184 countries between 2013 and 2040.

Joseph L Dieleman1, Tara Templin2, Nafis Sadat2, Patrick Reidy2, Abigail Chapin2, Kyle Foreman2, Annie Haakenstad3, Tim Evans4, Christopher J L Murray2, Christoph Kurowski4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A general consensus exists that as a country develops economically, health spending per capita rises and the share of that spending that is prepaid through government or private mechanisms also rises. However, the speed and magnitude of these changes vary substantially across countries, even at similar levels of development. In this study, we use past trends and relationships to estimate future health spending, disaggregated by the source of those funds, to identify the financing trajectories that are likely to occur if current policies and trajectories evolve as expected.
METHODS: We extracted data from WHO's Health Spending Observatory and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation's Financing Global Health 2015 report. We converted these data to a common purchasing power-adjusted and inflation-adjusted currency. We used a series of ensemble models and observed empirical norms to estimate future government out-of-pocket private prepaid health spending and development assistance for health. We aggregated each country's estimates to generate total health spending from 2013 to 2040 for 184 countries. We compared these estimates with each other and internationally recognised benchmarks.
FINDINGS: Global spending on health is expected to increase from US$7·83 trillion in 2013 to $18·28 (uncertainty interval 14·42-22·24) trillion in 2040 (in 2010 purchasing power parity-adjusted dollars). We expect per-capita health spending to increase annually by 2·7% (1·9-3·4) in high-income countries, 3·4% (2·4-4·2) in upper-middle-income countries, 3·0% (2·3-3·6) in lower-middle-income countries, and 2·4% (1·6-3·1) in low-income countries. Given the gaps in current health spending, these rates provide no evidence of increasing parity in health spending. In 1995 and 2015, low-income countries spent $0·03 for every dollar spent in high-income countries, even after adjusting for purchasing power, and the same is projected for 2040. Most importantly, health spending in many low-income countries is expected to remain low. Estimates suggest that, by 2040, only one (3%) of 34 low-income countries and 36 (37%) of 98 middle-income countries will reach the Chatham House goal of 5% of gross domestic product consisting of government health spending.
INTERPRETATION: Despite remarkable health gains, past health financing trends and relationships suggest that many low-income and lower-middle-income countries will not meet internationally set health spending targets and that spending gaps between low-income and high-income countries are unlikely to narrow unless substantive policy interventions occur. Although gains in health system efficiency can be used to make progress, current trends suggest that meaningful increases in health system resources will require concerted action. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27086174     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30167-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  52 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer from Chinese societal perspective.

Authors:  P-F Zhang; F Wen; J Zhou; J-X Huang; K-X Zhou; Q-J Wu; X-Y Wang; M-X Zhang; W-T Liao; Q Li
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Population healthcare: a new clinical responsibility.

Authors:  Muir Gray
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  The impact of net neutrality on digital health.

Authors:  Thomas Martin
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2018-08-27

4.  Geographic Variation in Household and Catastrophic Health Spending in India: Assessing the Relative Importance of Villages, Districts, and States, 2011-2012.

Authors:  Sanjay K Mohanty; Rockli Kim; Pijush Kanti Khan; S V Subramanian
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Telephone-based management of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in low- and middle-income countries: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Arora; L A Harvey; J V Glinsky; H S Chhabra; S Hossain; N Arumugam; P K Bedi; L Lavrencic; A J Hayes; I D Cameron
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Bedside Rationing Under Resource Constraints-A National Survey of Ethiopian Physicians' Use of Criteria for Priority Setting.

Authors:  Frehiwot Berhane Defaye; Marion Danis; Paul Wakim; Yemane Berhane; Ole Frithjof Norheim; Ingrid Miljeteig
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2019-04-19

Review 7.  Advancing global health and strengthening the HIV response in the era of the Sustainable Development Goals: the International AIDS Society-Lancet Commission.

Authors:  Linda-Gail Bekker; George Alleyne; Stefan Baral; Javier Cepeda; Demetre Daskalakis; David Dowdy; Mark Dybul; Serge Eholie; Kene Esom; Geoff Garnett; Anna Grimsrud; James Hakim; Diane Havlir; Michael T Isbell; Leigh Johnson; Adeeba Kamarulzaman; Parastu Kasaie; Michel Kazatchkine; Nduku Kilonzo; Michael Klag; Marina Klein; Sharon R Lewin; Chewe Luo; Keletso Makofane; Natasha K Martin; Kenneth Mayer; Gregorio Millett; Ntobeko Ntusi; Loyce Pace; Carey Pike; Peter Piot; Anton Pozniak; Thomas C Quinn; Jurgen Rockstroh; Jirair Ratevosian; Owen Ryan; Serra Sippel; Bruno Spire; Agnes Soucat; Ann Starrs; Steffanie A Strathdee; Nicholas Thomson; Stefano Vella; Mauro Schechter; Peter Vickerman; Brian Weir; Chris Beyrer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Future and potential spending on health 2015-40: development assistance for health, and government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending in 184 countries.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Cost-utility of revisions for cervical deformity correction warrants minimization of reoperations.

Authors:  Samantha R Horn; Peter G Passias; Aaron Hockley; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Hamid Hassanzadeh; Jason A Horowitz; Cole A Bortz; Frank A Segreto; Avery E Brown; Justin S Smith; Daniel M Sciubba; Gregory M Mundis; Michael P Kelley; Alan H Daniels; Douglas C Burton; Robert A Hart; Frank J Schwab; Shay Bess; Christopher I Shaffrey; Richard A Hostin; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

10.  Global, regional, national, and selected subnational levels of stillbirths, neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.