Literature DB >> 27086048

Examination of body checking, body image dissatisfaction, and negative affect using Ecological momentary assessment.

Emily C Stefano1, Danae L Hudson2, Brooke L Whisenhunt2, Erin M Buchanan2, Janet D Latner3.   

Abstract

Research has shown that non-clinical women, particularly those with high body concern, engage in frequent body checking behaviors. The purpose of this study was to use ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine the frequency and correlates of body checking behavior, including its association with body image dissatisfaction and negative affect, in non-clinical women with high body concern. Undergraduate female participants with high body concern (n=22) were assessed five times per day for five days via text messages sent to their smart phones. During each assessment, participants reported the number of times they engaged in eight different body checking behaviors and their current level of negative affect and body dissatisfaction. After aggregation, a total of 3064 body checking behaviors were reported by the sample during the five-day period. All participants reported engaging in body checking at least once per day, with a mean of 27.85 checking behaviors per day. Hierarchical Linear Modeling revealed that body checking significantly predicted both body dissatisfaction and negative affect. These results provide preliminary support for the cognitive behavioral theory of eating disorders, suggesting that as women engage in more frequent body checking behaviors, they also experience higher levels of body dissatisfaction and negative affect.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body checking; Body image dissatisfaction; Ecological momentary assessment; Negative affect

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27086048     DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eat Behav        ISSN: 1471-0153


  9 in total

1.  How do you feel when you check your body? Emotional states during a body-checking episode in normal-weight females.

Authors:  Leonie Wilhelm; Andrea S Hartmann; Martin Cordes; Manuel Waldorf; Silja Vocks
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Addressing the Challenges of Recruitment and Retention in Sleep and Circadian Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Stephanie H Yu; Nicole B Gumport; Isaac A Mirzadegan; Yuh-Jang Mei; Kerrie Hein; Allison G Harvey
Journal:  Behav Sleep Med       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.492

3.  Ecological Momentary Assessment in Behavioral Research: Addressing Technological and Human Participant Challenges.

Authors:  Lora E Burke; Saul Shiffman; Edvin Music; Mindi A Styn; Andrea Kriska; Asim Smailagic; Daniel Siewiorek; Linda J Ewing; Eileen Chasens; Brian French; Juliet Mancino; Dara Mendez; Patrick Strollo; Stephen L Rathbun
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Predicting the restrictive eating, exercise, and weight monitoring compulsions of anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  E Caitlin Lloyd; Maria Øverås; Øyvind Rø; Bas Verplanken; Anne M Haase
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.652

5.  Revisiting the Postulates of Etiological Models of Eating Disorders: Questioning Body Checking as a Longer-Term Maintaining Factor.

Authors:  Vanessa Opladen; Maj-Britt Vivell; Silja Vocks; Andrea S Hartmann
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Measuring Environmental Justice in Real Time: A Pilot Study Using Digital Participatory Method in the Global South, Nepal.

Authors:  Rehana Shrestha; Klaus Telkmann; Benjamin Schüz; Pramesh Koju; Reshma Shrestha; Biraj Karmacharya; Gabriele Bolte
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  The moderating effect of impulsivity on negative affect and body checking.

Authors:  K Naomi Pak; Joseph Wonderlich; Daniel le Grange; Scott G Engel; Scott Crow; Carol Peterson; Ross D Crosby; Stephen A Wonderlich; Sarah Fischer
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.735

8.  Multi-state modeling of thought-shape fusion using ecological momentary assessment.

Authors:  Tyler B Mason; Kathryn E Smith; Ross D Crosby; Scott G Engel; Carol B Peterson; Stephen A Wonderlich; Haomiao Jin
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2021-08-04

9.  The Accuracy of Self-Reported Body Weight Is High but Dependent on Recent Weight Change and Negative Affect in Teenage Girls.

Authors:  Corinna Koebnick; Brit Saksvig; Xia Li; Margo Sidell; Tong Tong Wu; Deborah R Young
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.