| Literature DB >> 27086034 |
G P Sidgwick1,2,3, D McGeorge4, A Bayat5,6.
Abstract
A number of equivalent-skin models are available for investigation of the ex vivo effect of topical application of drugs and cosmaceuticals onto skin, however many have their drawbacks. With the March 2013 ban on animal models for cosmetic testing of products or ingredients for sale in the EU, their utility for testing toxicity and effect on skin becomes more relevant. The aim of this study was to demonstrate proof of principle that altered expression of key gene and protein markers could be quantified in an optimised whole tissue biopsy culture model. Topical formulations containing green tea catechins (GTC) were investigated in a skin biopsy culture model (n = 11). Punch biopsies were harvested at 3, 7 and 10 days, and analysed using qRT-PCR, histology and HPLC to determine gene and protein expression, and transdermal delivery of compounds of interest. Reduced gene expression of α-SMA, fibronectin, mast cell tryptase, mast cell chymase, TGF-β1, CTGF and PAI-1 was observed after 7 and 10 days compared with treated controls (p < 0.05). Histological analysis indicated a reduction in mast cell tryptase and chymase positive cell numbers in treated biopsies compared with untreated controls at day 7 and day 10 (p < 0.05). Determination of transdermal uptake indicated that GTCs were detected in the biopsies. This model could be adapted to study a range of different topical formulations in both normal and diseased skin, negating the requirement for animal models in this context, prior to study in a clinical trial environment.Entities:
Keywords: Dermal delivery; Dermatology; Extracellular matrix; Inflammation; Mast cells; Skin scarring
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27086034 PMCID: PMC4902832 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-016-1645-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Dermatol Res ISSN: 0340-3696 Impact factor: 3.017
Fig. 1A diagram and flow chart depicting the organ culture methodology, and the experimental approach used in this study
List of the active ingredients included in the various treatments
| Cream name | Active ingredients |
|---|---|
| A—cream formulation 1: green tea extract | Aqua, Dipropylene Glycol Dipelargonate, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Glycerin, Cyclopentasiloxane, Cetyl Alcohol, Cetearyl Alcohol, Phenoxyethanol, Glyceryl Stearate, Peg-75 Stearate, Ceteth-20, Steareth-20, Poloxamer 235, Poloxamer 338, Ethoxydiglycol, Xanthan Gum, |
| B—base cream formulation 1: (control) | Aqua, Dipropylene Glycol Dipelargonate, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Glycerin, Cyclopentasiloxane, Cetyl Alcohol, Cetearyl Alcohol, Phenoxyethanol, Glyceryl Stearate, Peg-75 Stearate, Ceteth-20, Steareth-20, Poloxamer 235, Poloxamer 338, Ethoxydiglycol, Xanthan Gum, Butylene Glycol, Tocophersolan, Tocopherol, Maltodextrin, Triethanolamine, Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer, Ethylhexylglycerin, Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil, Lecithin, |
| C—cream formulation 2: green tea extract | Aqua, Glycerin, Olus (vegetable) oil, Rosa Canina Fruit Oil, Triticum Vulgare, (Wheat) Germ Oil, |
| D—base cream formulation 2: (control) | Aqua, Glycerin, Olus (vegetable) oil, Rosa Canina Fruit Oil, Triticum Vulgare, (Wheat) Germ Oil, Cera Alba, Glyceryl Stearate Citrate, Cetearyl, Alcohol, Glyceryl Caprylate, Benzyl Alcohol, Salicylic Acid, Glycerin, Sorbic Acid, Allantoin, Xanthan Gum, Arginine, |
| Cream E: Eucerin (10 % urea) control cream—commercially available moisturizer | Aqua, Benzyl Alcohol, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Dimethicone, Glycerin, Hydrogenated Castor Oil, Isopropyl Palmitate, Lactic Acid, Magnesium, Sulfate, Methoxy PEG-22-Dodecyl Glycol Copolymer, Octyldodecanol, Ozokerite, Cera Microcristallina, PEG-2 Hydrogenated Castor Oil, PEG-45 Dodecyl Glycol, Copolymer, PEG-7 Hydrogenated Castor Oil, Sodium Lactate, Sorbitan, Isostearate, |
| Untreated control | No topical treatment |
Cream A and B were the same formulation, with cream A containing the active ingredients and cream B being the base cream control
Cream C and D were a different formulation, with cream C containing the active ingredient and cream D being the base cream control. Two further controls were included—Cream E was Eucerin (10 % Urea) moisturiser, and a further set of biopsies which were untreated. Active ingredients are indicated in bold
A list of PCR primers used in this study, along with the Roche probe ID
| Primers | Sequence | Probe |
|---|---|---|
| Collagen I | ||
| L | ctgtacgcaggtgattggtg | 15 |
| R | atgttcagctttgtggacctc | 15 |
| Fibronectin | ||
| L | gccactggagtctttaccaca | 64 |
| R | cctcggtgttgtaaggtgga | 64 |
| α-SMA | ||
| L | ctgttccagccatccttcat | 58 |
| R | tcatgatgctgttgtaggtggt | 58 |
| TGF-β1 | ||
| L | agtggttgagccgtggag | 68 |
| R | tgcagtgtgttatccctgct | 68 |
| MC Triptase | ||
| L | gcgatgtggacaatgatgag | 6 |
| R | tccattatggggaccttcac | 6 |
| MC Chymase | ||
| L | acggaactttgtgctgacg | 4 |
| R | ggctccaagggtgactgtta | 4 |
| CTGF | ||
| L | ccgtactcccaaaatctcca | 71 |
| R | ttagctcggtatgtcttcatgc | 71 |
| PI3-K | ||
| L | ttgactttgaggtagtccagacc | 71 |
| R | aaaagtgtccctgttgattcttct | 71 |
| PAI-1 | ||
| L | aaactccctagtctccacctga | 14 |
| R | ccttaagggagttgtgcttca | 14 |
| STAT3 | ||
| L | tgatgcagtttggaaataatgg | 18 |
| R | catgtcaaaggtgagggactc | 18 |
| MMP-3 | ||
| L | caaaacatatttctttgtagaggacaa | 36 |
| R | ttcagctatttgcttgggaaa | 36 |
| RPL32 | ||
| L | gaagttcctggtccacaacg | 17 |
| R | gagcgatctcggcacagta | 17 |
Fig. 2The chemical structures and molecular weights of the four main green tea catechins (GTCs), (-)-epicatechin (EC), (-)-epigallocatechin (EGC), (-)-epicatechin gallate (ECG) and (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG)
Fig. 3Comparison of fold change in gene expression in the organ culture models treated with cream A (top row) and cream C (bottom row) after 3, 7 and 10 days (First, second and third columns, respectively) compared with the treated and untreated controls, as indicated in the key. (Statistical significance as derived from the students T test indicated as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 4Details of the HPLC calibration experiments performed. a An example HPLC trace, indicating the resolution of the EGC (~5.5 min), EC (~11.3 min) and EGCG (~13.1 min) peaks observed in a mixed calibration curve sample. Pure GTC compounds were solubilised separately, and following serial dilution were injected at increasing concentrations. ECG peak at ~37 min is not shown due to scale. b An example calibration curve for EGCG (n = 6 separate calibration curves), the most commonly found and bioreactive GTC found in C. sinensis. c Characteristics of the individual GTC HPLC calibration curves (n = 6), indicating the reproducibility and linearity of the protocol and methodology
Fig. 5Photographs of 6 mm punch biopsies removed from whole tissue organ culture experiments after 3, 7 and 10 days, for treated samples and untreated controls. After 10 days, there was no observable difference in tissue morphology, size, integrity or skin colour between the untreated controls and the treated samples. Scale bar 1 mm
Fig. 6Immunohistological analysis of tissue morphology in an organ culture model using hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) staining. Day 0, Day 3, Day 7 and Day 10 untreated biopsies (no formulation used) were included as a control. There was little difference in epidermal cell layer thickness between day 0, day 3, day 7 and day 10, nor in morphology between the different green tea formulations and the treated and untreated controls. Scale bar = 200 µm
Fig. 7Immunohistological analysis of mast cell tryptase protein expression. Day 0, Day 3, Day 7 and Day 10 untreated biopsies (no formulation used) were included as a control. Mast cell numbers were reduced in Cream A and Cream C after 7 and 10 days, compared with treated and untreated controls. Scale bar = 200 µm
Fig. 8Immunohistological analysis of mast cell chymase expression in an organ culture model using peroxidise staining. Day 0, Day 3, Day 7 and Day 10 untreated biopsies untreated biopsies (no formulation used) were included as a control. Mast cell numbers were reduced in cream A and cream C after 7 and 10 days, compared with treated and untreated controls. Scale bar = 200 µm