Literature DB >> 2708593

Structure-function relationships in rat brainstem subnucleus interpolaris: IV. Projection neurons.

M F Jacquin1, M Barcia, R W Rhoades.   

Abstract

In a companion paper (Jacquin et al., '89), the structure and function of local circuit (LC) neurons in spinal trigeminal (V) subnucleus interpolaris (Sp Vi) were described. The present report provides similar data for 44 projection neurons in Sp Vi. Of these, 25 thalamic, 16 cerebellar, 2 superior collicular, and 1 inferior olivary projecting neurons were studied. The majority responded to vibrissa(e) deflection, and all except 4 of these had multivibrissae receptive fields. The remainder were responsive to either guard hair deflection or indentation of glabrous skin. Latencies to V ganglion shocks were suggestive of monosynaptic activation from the periphery. Sp Vi projection neurons were topographically organized in a manner consistent with that of their primary afferent inputs. Nonvibrissa sensitive cells had diverse morphologies. Morphometric analyses of the more heavily sampled thalamic and cerebellar projecting, vibrissa(e)-sensitive cells indicated the following. (1) As compared to LC neurons, projection neurons had bigger receptive fields, cell bodies, dendritic trees, and axons; less circular dendritic trees; a greater preponderance of spiny dendrites and fewer axon collaterals in Sp Vi. (2) Dendritic tree extent correlated significantly with receptive field size, thus suggesting that dendritic tree size is one mechanism contributing to receptive field size in vibrissae-sensitive projection neurons. (3) V thalamic cells had significantly bigger receptive fields and dendritic trees, and also give off more local axon collaterals, than V cerebellar neurons. Collicular and inferior olivary projecting neurons shared structural and functional attributes with other Sp Vi long-range projecting cells. Structure-function relationships exist for vibrissa-sensitive projection neurons in Sp Vi. The relevant parameters correlating with projection neuron morphology are receptive field size and projection status, whereas for Sp Vi LC neurons the relevant correlative parameter is peripheral receptor association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2708593     DOI: 10.1002/cne.902820105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  26 in total

1.  Electrophysiological properties and synaptic responses of cells in the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus of postnatal rats.

Authors:  F S Lo; W Guido; R S Erzurumlu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Parallel streams for the relay of vibrissal information through thalamic barreloids.

Authors:  T Pierret; P Lavallée; M Deschênes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Molecular determinants of the face map development in the trigeminal brainstem.

Authors:  Reha S Erzurumlu; Zhou-Feng Chen; Mark F Jacquin
Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol       Date:  2006-02

4.  Angular tuning bias of vibrissa-responsive cells in the paralemniscal pathway.

Authors:  Takahiro Furuta; Kouichi Nakamura; Martin Deschenes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Laterodorsal nucleus of the thalamus: A processor of somatosensory inputs.

Authors:  Tatiana Bezdudnaya; Asaf Keller
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Patterns of convergence in rat zona incerta from the trigeminal nuclear complex: light and electron microscopic study.

Authors:  Kimberly Simpson; Yue Wang; Rick C S Lin
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Response properties of the periodontal mechanosensitive neurons in the trigeminal main sensory nucleus of the cat.

Authors:  T Tabata; K Karita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Origins of cortical layer V surround receptive fields in the rat barrel cortex.

Authors:  Nicholas Wright; Kevin Fox
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Feedforward inhibitory control of sensory information in higher-order thalamic nuclei.

Authors:  Philippe Lavallée; Nadia Urbain; Caroline Dufresne; Hajnalka Bokor; László Acsády; Martin Deschênes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Neural mechanisms underlying somatic tinnitus.

Authors:  Susan Shore; Jianxun Zhou; Seth Koehler
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.