Literature DB >> 27085687

A matched-cohort analysis of 192 pancreatic anaplastic carcinomas and 960 pancreatic adenocarcinomas: A 13-year North American experience using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB).

Alessandro Paniccia1, Patrick W Hosokawa2, Richard D Schulick1, William Henderson2, Jeffrey Kaplan3, Csaba Gajdos4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic pancreatic carcinoma (APC) is a rare and poorly characterized disease. We sought to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of APC to pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
METHODS: The American National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with resected APC and PDAC using histologic and operative codes. APC cases were matched 1:5 with PDACs based on age, sex, pathologic tumor stage, operative margin status, lymph node positivity ratio, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy.
RESULTS: After 1:5 matching, 192 APCs and 960 PDACs were analyzed. When comparing APC vs PDAC the median tumor size was 45 mm (interquartile range, 33-60) vs 30 mm (interquartile range, 23-40; P < .001), and metastatic nodal disease was present in 40.6% and 38.0% of the cases (P = .25), respectively. APC cases were distributed equally between the head and the body/tail region of the pancreas (50%), while PDAC cases were located mainly in the head of the pancreas (75%; P < .001). Although the resected APC group had a lesser survival during the first year after the diagnosis (51% vs 69%; P = .029), the overall survival was similar in the 2 groups, with 21.6% vs 17.4% alive at 5 years, respectively for APC and PDAC (P = .32). Subgroup analysis of patients with APC with (n = 18) versus those without (n = 80) osteoclastlike giant cells showed a greater 5-year survival (50% versus 15%, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Patients with resected APC tend to present with large tumors equally distributed between the head and body/tail of the pancreas. While APC is thought to have a more aggressive biology, our matched analysis showed similar overall survival compared with PDAC. The presence of osteoclastlike giant cells portends a significantly better prognosis compared with other histologic features of APCs.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27085687     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.02.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  5 in total

1.  Relationship between cellular morphology and abnormality of SWI/SNF complex subunits in pancreatic undifferentiated carcinoma.

Authors:  Takeo Yamamoto; Kenichi Kohashi; Yutaka Yamada; Jun Kawata; Kukiko Sakihama; Ryota Matsuda; Yutaka Koga; Shinichi Aishima; Masafumi Nakamura; Yoshinao Oda
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.322

2.  Natural History and Treatment Trends in Pancreatic Cancer Subtypes.

Authors:  Courtney J Pokrzywa; Daniel E Abbott; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Emily R Winslow; Sharon M Weber; Alexander V Fisher
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Anaplastic pancreatic cancer diagnosed with endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration showing hypervascular tumor: A case report.

Authors:  Takehide Fujimoto; Osamu Inatomi; Ryo Mizuno; Shuhei Shintani; Atsushi Nishida; Shigeki Bamba; Mitsushige Sugimoto; Akira Andoh
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Osteoclast-like Giant Cell-type Pancreatic Anaplastic Carcinoma Presenting with a Duodenal Polypoid Lesion.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Matsubayashi; Junichi Kaneko; Junya Sato; Tatsunori Satoh; Hirotoshi Ishiwatari; Teichi Sugiura; Ryo Ashida; Katsuhiko Uesaka; Keiko Sasaki; Hiroyuki Ono
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 1.271

Review 5.  SMARCB1/INI1-deficient pancreatic undifferentiated rhabdoid carcinoma mimicking solid pseudopapillary neoplasm: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Yinan Hua; Piyush Soni; Douglas Larsen; Riyam Zreik; Bing Leng; Debby Rampisela
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.