The influence of sexual harassment on mental health among female military personnel of the Republic of Korea Armed Forces.

INTRODUCTION: Reports of sexual harassment are becoming more frequent in Republic of Korea (ROK) Armed Forces. This study aimed to analyse the impact of sexual harassment on mental health among female military personnel of the ROK Armed Forces.
METHODS: Data from the 2014 Military Health Survey were used. Instances of sexual harassment were recorded as 'yes' or 'no'. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out to compare Kessler Psychological Distress Scale 10 (K-10) scores. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify associations between sexual harassment and K-10 scores.
RESULTS: Among 228 female military personnel, 13 (5.7%) individuals experienced sexual harassment. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that sexual harassment had a significantly negative impact on K-10 scores (3.486, p<0.04). Higher K-10 scores among individuals experiencing sexual harassment were identified in the unmarried (including never-married) group (6.761, p<0.04), the short-term military service group (12.014, p<0.03) and the group whose length of service was <2 years (11.067, p<0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Sexual harassment has a negative impact on mental health. Factors associated with worse mental health scores included service classification and length of service. The results provide helpful information with which to develop measures for minimising the negative psychological effects from sexual harassment and promoting sexual harassment prevention policy. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

The Republic of Korea (ROK) Armed Forces have been promoting policies to increase the proportion of female military personnel.

Sexual harassment and sexual assault in the military increased 4.5-fold in 2013 (59 cases), compared with 2010 (13 cases).

Generally, the experience of being sexually harassed was negatively associated with female military personnel's mental health.

The impact on mental health as a result of sexual harassment largely depended upon the marital status, the service classification and the length of service.

Introduction

South Korean culture is deeply rooted in Confucianism, wherein obedience and respect for one's seniors are expected. In addition, male chauvinism and a householder system, which has lasted for hundreds of years, place South Korean women at comparatively lower status than men.1–3 Male dominance in Korean society has weakened with the expansion of Western culture, bolstering the social influence of women; nevertheless, deference to men remains strong.

The Republic of Korea (ROK) Armed Forces has enlisted female personnel since 1949 when 490 women were enlisted and the current number of female military personnel in the ROK Armed Forces exceeds 9200. Female cadets are also admitted to the Korean Air Force Academy since 1997, the Korean Military Academy since 1998 and the Korean Naval Academy since 1999. The first female officer was promoted to the rank of general in 2002. The Reserved Officer’'s Training Corps (2011) and the Korean Army Academy at Yeong-cheon (2015) also permit the entrance of women among their ranks. The ROK Armed Forces also actively promotes policies to increase the proportions of female military personnel and by 2020, their goal is to increase the proportion of female officers to 7.7% and the non-commissioned officer (NCO) ratio of female military personnel to 5.5%.4

Female military personnel have several strengths, compared with male military personnel. In particular, they show expertise in the operation of advanced equipment, record keeping and various other sophisticated skills. For this reason, the importance of the female military personnel has emerged in the ROK Armed Forces.

The percentage of women in the Korean workforce was 36% in 1963 and has increased by 16.6% since 1963. However, inclusion of a small number of women in male-dominated groups creates an environment for potential gender discrimination, sexual harassment and sexual abuse; compared with their male counterparts, opportunities for promotion are relatively small. Moreover, most Korean women do not return to work after childbirth, which further reduces the number of women in the workforce.

Sexual harassment and sexual assault in the military increased 4.5-fold between 2010 and 2013 (13 vs 59 cases).5 In 2014, a female officer committed suicide after ongoing harassment, and the general officer was arrested for the molestation and rape of female NCOs. These reports of sexual harassment and violence in the military have created social unrest and discussions about the treatment of women in the military are becoming commonplace. As the issue of sexual harassment affects the honour of the military, the ROK Armed Forces have responded with various programmes for the prevention of gender-related incidents, including mandatory, annual sexual harassment prevention training for officers and NCOs. A ‘one-out’ system was implemented to punish perpetrators of sexual harassment and sexual assault, and a female sexual harassment counsellor was hired to help resolve complaints involving female military personnel.

Mental health is a serious problem in Korea.6 7 The suicide rate in Korea (38.3 per 100 000 individuals) is the highest among Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries. The suicide rate among those serving in the military is particularly concerning. According to a 2012 survey, the prevalence of depression in the entire military was 4.6%, which is 2.5-fold higher than that for the general civilian population.8 The rates of depression by branch are 7.0% for the army, 3.0% for the navy and 2.0% for the air force.

In a previous study of female lawyers and military personnel, those who had experienced or observed sexual harassment by male superiors or colleagues reported lower overall job satisfaction and expressed a greater intention to quit than women who had not experienced or observed sexual harassment by male superiors or colleagues.9 Also, if women reported experiencing military-related sexual assault, screening indicated a twofold higher incidence of alcohol abuse.10 Another study showed that female veterans who experienced military sexual trauma exhibit higher rates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) than those women who experienced combat trauma and traumatic death. Military sexual trauma has been shown to be directly correlated with mental health.11 Also, girls or boys who acknowledged sexually harassing others were four to six times more likely to use alcohol than their non-harassing peers,12 such that the odds of a mental health diagnosis such as PTSD, other anxiety disorders, depression and substance use disorders were increased.13 A number of studies have shown consistent gender differences regarding perceptions of, and reactions to sexual harassment in the workplace. Women were more aware of the occurrence of sexual harassment than men. Sexual abuse is a significant antecedent of suicidal behaviour, particularly among women.13 14

The importance of a study on the relationship between mental health and sexual harassment among female military personnel cannot be overstated. Although many investigations have examined the relationships of sexual harassment with mental health, they have focused on members of the UK and the US Armed Forces, overseas deployments and PTSD.15–17 To our knowledge, the present study is the first to specifically examine the relationship between sexual harassment and mental health among ROK female military personnel. We also investigated the relationships between mental health and sexual harassment according to service classification and length of military service.

Methods

Study population

The study used data from the 2014 Military Health Survey (MHS) conducted by the School of Military Medicine, which was designed to obtain military health determinants. Raw data were obtained from the Korean Military Medical School with the Dean's approval. The institutional review board of the Armed Forces Medical Command (AFMC) provided formal ethics approval for the MHS data sets. Since the 2014 MHS is an anonymous, self-administered survey, individual responses cannot be linked to specific personnel or medical records. A total of 8012 military personnel (officer, NCO or warranty officer: 3599; enlisted soldiers: 4413) were included in the data. Male military personnel were excluded from further study. Of the 283 eligible female military personnel, 55 women were excluded from the study due to missing or incomplete data. The total number of female military personnel in the study was 228.

Variables

The dependent variable comprised scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale 10 (K-10) Index. This self-report instrument consists of 10 items and is designed to measure levels of distress in clinical and population surveys. The K-10 total score ranges from 10 to 50. It has been widely implemented and was used in the WHO World Mental Health Survey. Prior research has shown the K-10 to be an excellent screening tool for mental health disorders.18 The 2001 Victorian Population Health Survey adopted a set of cut-off scores that can be used as a guide for psychological distress screening.19 However, K-10 test validation is dependent upon the characteristics of each country. Typically, the disorder is screened by setting the optimal score to 24 points.20 In South Korea, 76% of subjects whose K-10 scores were >13 points had sought psychiatric care within the past year.21

Military personnel responded to the 10 self-administered questions using a scale ranging from 1 to 5. In the MHS version of the K-10, all 10 questions were asked regarding the previous month. Each question has five possible responses: ‘all of the time’, ‘most of the time’, ‘some of the time’, ‘a little of the time’ or ‘none of the time’ (coded as 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1, respectively). Higher scores indicate greater degrees of psychological distress.22

The variable of primary interest was ‘experience of sexual harassment’. In the MHS, the question was asked regarding the military service periods. The question has two possible responses: ‘yes’ and ‘no’ (coded as 1 and 0, respectively). Sexual harassment was separated into five levels: (a) gender harassment, generalised sexist remarks and behaviour; (b) seductive behaviour, inappropriate and offensive, but essentially sanction-free, sexual advances; (c) sexual bribery, solicitation of sexual activity or other sex-linked behaviour with promise of rewards; (d) sexual coercion, pressure for sexual activity by threat of punishment and (e) sexual assault, gross sexual imposition or assault.23 Other independent variables considered in the analysis were age, education level, marital status, dependent children, military type, branch, rank, service classification, length of service, workplace, number of working hours per week, stress from immediate superior, physical activity and weight fluctuation. Branch was classified into four levels: (a) combat branch, infantry, armour, artillery, air defence, intelligence, engineering, information/communication and aviation; (b) technical service branch, ordinance, quarter master, transportation and chemical; (c) administrative support branch, adjutant general, military police, finance and troop information and education and (d) special branch, medical, judge advocate and chaplain. Rank was classified into two groups: ‘officer (above O-1)’ and ‘non-commissioned officer (above E-5)’. Service classification was classified into three groups: (a) long-term military service, starting from excellent short-term or extended military service personnel, ROK Armed Forces guarantees >10 years of service conditions for each soldier; (b) extended military service, long-term military service candidates not selected as long-term military service personnel (contracts extend military service on an annual basis until selected for long-term military service) and (c) short-term military service, basic service period of the military service (3 years).

Statistical analysis

For group comparisons, whether or not personnel experienced sexual harassment was analysed separately. Adjustments were made for mental health, whether or not sexual harassment was experienced and the following variables: age, education level, marital status, dependent children, military type, branch, rank, service classification, length of service, workplace, number of working hours per week, stress from an immediate superior, physical activity and weight fluctuation.

Descriptive statistics showed the general characteristics of study populations by variables. To compare the average values of the K-10 according to the independent variables, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed. Multiple linear regression analysis was carried out to examine the association between experiences of sexual harassment and K-10 score. Subgroup analysis was performed for the following combined variables: marital status, rank, service classification and length of service. All analyses were performed using SAS software, V.9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).

Results

The study population consisted of 228 female military personnel of the ROK Armed Forces. Thirteen (5.7%) female military personnel reported sexual harassment. The proportion of personnel in the 25–43 years of age group (52.2%) was slightly higher than the 19–24 years of age group (52.2% vs 47.8%, respectively). Unmarried (including never-married) personnel totalled 177 (77.6%) in the study population. With regard to service classification, the study population comprised 70 women (30.7%) with long-term military service, 91 women (39.9%) with short-term military service and 67 women (29.4%) with extended military service (Table 1).

Table 1

General characteristics of the study population

	N (%)
Experience of sexual harassment
Yes	13 (5.7)
No	215 (94.3)
Age (years)
19–24	109 (47.8)
25–43	119 (52.2)
Education
≤High school	59 (25.9)
≥Graduate from university	169 (74.1)
Marital status
Married	51 (22.4)
Unmarried	177 (77.6)
Dependent children
Yes	35 (15.4)
No	193 (84.7)
Military type
Army	150 (65.8)
Navy, Marine	54 (23.7)
Air force	24 (10.5)
Branch
Combat branch	97 (42.5)
Technical service branch	69 (30.3)
Administrative support branch	26 (11.4)
Special branch	36 (15.8)
Rank
Officer	63 (27.6)
Non-commissioned officer	165 (72.4)
Service classification
Long-term military service	70 (30.7)
Short-term military service	91 (39.9)
Extended military service	67 (29.4)
Length of services (years)
≤2	101 (44.3)
≥3	127 (55.7)
Workplace
Urban	101 (44.3)
Rural	118 (51.8)
Isolated area	9 (4.0)
Work hours per week
≤40	40 (17.5)
≤48	53 (23.3)
≤56	80 (35.1)
≥57	55 (24.1)
Stress from immediate superior
High	147 (64.5)
Low	81 (35.5)
Physical activity (days of activity per week)
0 per week	82 (36.0)
1–2 per week	78 (34.2)
≥3 per week	68 (29.8)
Weight fluctuation
Yes (loss or gain in weight (≥3 kg))	142 (62.3)
None	86 (37.7)

The average K-10 score was higher for the sexual harassment group (20.86±10.38) than the no sexual harassment group (14.81±6.16). K-10 scores by age, education level, rank, length of service, workplace, stress from immediate superior, physical activity and weight fluctuation were higher for the sexual harassment group than the no sexual harassment group. However, K-10 scores by marital status (married), dependent children (yes), military type (navy, marine), branch (technical service branch, administrative support branch), service classification (long-term military service) and work hours per week (50

Table 2

Mean scores on the K-10 Index for the study population

				Experience of sexual harassment
	Total			Yes			No
	Mean	SD	p Value	Mean	SD	p Value	Mean	SD	p Value
Age (years)
19–24	15.20	6.61	0.7714	20.86	10.38	0.1712	14.81	6.16	0.8068
25–43	14.99	5.49		15.00	5.51		14.99	5.52
Education
≤High school	15.15	5.28	0.9213	15.50	3.54	0.8422	15.14	5.35	0.6988
≥Graduate from university	15.07	6.30		18.64	9.38		14.82	5.99
Marital status
Married	13.35	2.88	0.0104	12.00	0.71	0.004	13.50	2.99	0.0438
Unmarried	15.59	6.60		22.00	9.26		15.29	6.33
Dependent children
Yes	13.43	2.87	0.0511	12.00	0.00	0.1113	13.52	2.94	0.1029
No	15.39	6.41		19.27	9.06		15.16	6.17
Military type
Army	14.96	5.68	0.0286	20.00	10.89	0.6370	14.71	5.24	0.0066
Navy, Marine	17.79	10.35		14.00	3.46		18.33	10.93
Air force	14.26	3.89		18.00	10.89		14.04	3.63
Branch
Combat branch	15.34	6.69	0.1628	20.14	10.85	0.3842	14.97	6.19	0.1489
Technical service branch	14.13	3.60		12.00	0.00		14.19	3.63
Administrative support branch	16.88	8.17		13.00	0.00		17.04	8.30
Special branch	14.97	6.06		19.33	5.86		14.58	6.01
Rank
Officer	15.78	6.32	0.2419	22.00	16.46	0.9321	15.47	5.55	0.3369
Non-commissioned officer	14.83	5.93		17.00	5.87		14.69	5.92
Service classification
Long-term military service	14.23	4.68	0.0177	14.00	2.55	0.0708	14.25	4.82	0.0641
Short-term military service	16.36	7.74		29.00	11.53		15.93	7.29
Extended military service	14.27	4.16		15.80	6.14		14.15	4.00
Length of services (years)
≤2	15.82	6.59	0.0729	26.00	11.17	0.0241	15.40	6.07	0.2161
≥3	14.51	5.53		14.67	4.74		14.50	5.60
Workplace
Urban	15.01	6.10	0.9681	18.40	12.72	0.7166	14.83	5.63	0.9661
Rural	15.18	6.21		18.14	6.59		14.99	6.17
Isolated area	14.89	2.32		17.00	0.00		14.63	2.33
Work hours per week
≤45 (Q1)	13.85	4.24	0.0335	23.00	7.00	0.2094	13.11	3.03	0.0218
≤50 (Q2)	14.47	4.50		18.00	0.00		14.40	4.52
≤56 (Q3)	14.89	5.93		13.20	2.77		15.00	6.08
≤57 (Q4)	16.89	8.03		20.75	13.67		16.59	7.56
Stress from immediate superior
High	14.07	6.50	0.0003	19.00	10.14	0.7678	15.90	6.25	0.0003
Low	13.32	4.63		16.80	6.61		13.09	4.43
Physical activity (days of activity per week)
0 per week	15.47	6.35	0.0045	16.25	7.85	0.7319	15.43	6.33	0.0067
1–2 per week	13.31	3.27		16.33	2.89		13.17	3.23
≥3 per week	16.21	7.14		20.33	11.45		15.88	6.70
Weight fluctuation
Yes (loss or gain in weight (≥ 3 kg))	15.42	6.62	0.251	19.50	10.20	0.5549	15.17	6.32	0.3478
None	14.56	4.93		16.00	6.00		14.47	4.89
Total	15.09	5.45		18.15	8.71		14.91	5.82

K-10, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale 10.

Multiple linear regression analysis of the K-10 score was conducted to investigate the relationship between mental health and sexual harassment. The mean K-10 score was significantly higher for the sexual harassment group than the no sexual harassment group (β=3.486, p=0.0397). Scores were significantly higher for unmarried female military personnel than married female military personnel (β=3.401, p=0.0348). K-10 score for stress from immediate superior in the ‘high’ group was higher than the ‘low’ group (β=2.592, p=0.0016; Table 3).

Table 3

Regression model coefficients and p values of K-10 Index values

	K-10
	β	SE	p Value
Experience of sexual harassment
Yes	3.486	1.684	0.0397
No	Ref.	–	–
Age (years)
19–24	−0.124	1.024	0.9034
25–43	Ref.	–	–
Education
≤High school	0.425	0.996	0.6697
≥Graduate from university	Ref.	–	–
Marital status
Married	Ref.	–	–
Unmarried	3.401	1.600	0.0348
Dependent children
Yes	Ref.	–	–
No	−1.531	1.811	0.399
Military type
Army	Ref.	–	–
Navy, Marine	2.521	1.317	0.057
Air force	−0.941	1.148	0.4131
Branch
Combat branch	−0.408	1.239	0.7421
Technical service branch	−0.851	1.227	0.4891
Administrative support branch	1.439	1.528	0.3472
Special branch	Ref.	–	–
Rank
Officer	0.169	1.017	0.8682
Non-commissioned officer	Ref.	–	–
Service classification
Long-term military service	0.820	1.073	0.4454
Short-term military service	2.067	1.052	0.0507
Extended military service	Ref.	–	–
Length of services (years)
≤2	−0.368	1.029	0.7208
≥3	Ref.	–	–
Workplace
Urban	0.681	2.109	0.7472
Rural	0.932	2.049	0.6495
Isolated area	Ref.	–	–
Work hours per week
≤45 (Q1)	−2.472	1.269	0.0528
≤50 (Q2)	−2.119	1.206	0.0803
≤56 (Q3)	−1.974	1.039	0.0589
≤57 (Q4)	Ref.	–	–
Stress from immediate superior
High	2.592	0.810	0.0016
Low	Ref.	–	–
Physical activity (days of activity per week)
0 per week	Ref.	–	–
1–2 per week	−1.038	0.932	0.2664
≥3 per week	−3.013	1.011	0.0032
Weight fluctuation
Yes (loss or gain in weight (≥ 3 kg))	0.327	0.821	0.6911
None	Ref.	–	–

K-10, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale 10.

Subgroup analyses were performed by marital status, rank, service classification and length of service. In the unmarried group, female military personnel who experienced sexual harassment tended to have higher K-10 scores (β=6.761, p=0.0355). In the short-term military service group, female military personnel who had experienced sexual harassment tended to have higher K-10 scores (β=12.014, p=0.0269). In the extended military service group, female military personnel who had experienced sexual harassment tended to have higher K-10 scores (β=4.666, p=0.0385). The short-term military service group was more affected by sexual harassment than the extended military service group. When female military personnel experienced sexual harassment, personnel whose length of service were <2 years tended to have higher K-10 scores (β=11.067, p=0.0159; Table 4).

Table 4

Coefficients and p values from multiple linear regression analysis* of K-10 scores when female military personnel experienced sexual harassment according to marital status, rank, service classification and length of service

		K-10
		β	SE	p Value
Marital status	Married	−2.500	1.574	0.1187
	Unmarried	6.761	3.191	0.0355
Rank	Officer	10.878	7.128	0.1320
	Non-commissioned officer	3.176	1.975	0.1098
Service classification	Long-term military service	0.668	1.989	0.7378
	Short-term military service	12.014	5.342	0.0269
	Extended military service	4.666	2.209	0.0385
Length of service (years)	≤2	11.067	4.512	0.0159
	≥3	0.398	1.906	0.8350

*Adjusted for age, education, marital status, dependent children, military type, branch, rank, service classification, length of service, workplace, work hours per week, stress from immediate superior, physical activities and weight fluctuation.

K-10, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale 10.

Discussion

Previous studies have assessed how the experience of sexual harassment affects mental health. Sexual harassment is adversely associated with mental health, most notably in PTSD, anxiety, depression and substance use disorders.10 11 13 24 Our results corroborate those findings.

In the present study, we analysed how an experience of sexual harassment impacts the mental health of female members of the ROK Armed Forces. In order to clarify the effects on mental health, the experience of sexual harassment was explored as a socioeconomic element and then analysed with respect to mental health. Generally, K-10 scores were higher for female military personnel who were sexually harassed. Our results verify previous research that shows sexual harassment is associated with emotional problems.25 26

This study, unlike others, focused on the unique features of the military. Unmarried female military personnel who were sexually harassed during their military services demonstrated higher K-10 scores than married female military personnel who experienced sexual harassment. Previous research has shown that married people generally exhibit better mental health than unmarried (including never-married and formerly married) persons.27 28 The experience of sexual harassment can involve many subjective factors: Korean citizens are relatively private in nature and prefer not to discuss their sexual histories. Korean singles are particularly reluctant to talk openly about sexual intercourse. These properties had a further negative impact on mental health when unmarried female personnel experienced sexual harassment.

The impact on mental health as a result of sexual harassment largely depended upon service classification. Female military personnel with short-term military service or extended military service who experienced sexual harassment showed a more negative impact on their mental health than female military personnel with long-term service. A previous study showed that compared with permanent employees, temporary employees exhibit a higher combined risk estimate for psychological distress.25 As there is no obligatory military service for women in Korea, most are selected to join the military as professional soldiers and generally desire long-term service. Women in short-term service and extended service must be selected in order to continue serving in long term; therefore, they are in the most vulnerable military positions. Also, they must receive good reviews and recommendations from immediate superiors in order to be selected for long-term military service. In this situation, some female military personnel are unable to report sexual harassment from their immediate superiors. As short-term military service personnel are not yet selected into extended military service, they are more vulnerable than extended military service personnel.

Meanwhile, in the <2 years of services group, K-10 scores increased when sexual harassment occurred. A previous study showed that new staff had a higher prevalence of psychiatric problems in the workplace as a result of difficulty adapting to the new environment.29 When enlisting as younger women, most of the female military personnel demonstrated difficulties with adapting to military service. The experience of sexual harassment only worsens their mental health. Female military personnel in their early 20 s in the <2 years of service group demonstrate additional sensitivity to sexual harassment.

Based on our results, ROK Armed Forces should enforce sexual harassment policies. Emphasis should be placed on the prevention of sexual harassment and not just upon correction and punishment after the incident is reported. The ROK Armed Forces should introduce a sexual harassment questionnaire in order to stay informed of the issue of sexual harassment. The US military has developed a questionnaire that indicates the prevalence of sexual harassment within its ranks.30 Second, the ROK military should strengthen gender perspective education. A previous study showed that the biggest reason sexual harassment occurred was the perception by male superiors that female workers were not considered ‘professional coworkers’ but simply ‘women’.31 The ROK Armed Forces should create an environment that encourages conversation about the differences between male and female soldiers. Third, for the long-term military service selection among the basic female military personnel, it is necessary to develop a selection standard in order to better reflect overall assessment. Also, for fair assessment, specific evidence of the superior's assessment should be submitted. Verification procedures should be developed.

This study is distinguished from others because the results were derived in detail to discriminate personal and ROK Armed Forces characteristics. The study was based on political and cultural characteristics unique to Korea and focused on the relationship between mental health and sexual harassment.

This study should be considered in the context of its strengths and limitations. First, all the data were statistically collected from a survey of ROK Armed Forces conducted by the School of Military Medicine, which is an affiliated organisation of the National Defence. The MHS results represent 600 000 ROK Armed Forces. Second, as far as we know, this is the first study to use the MHS data in an attempt to investigate mental health and sexual harassment. The report is based on female military personnel's K-10 scores, which is an excellent screening tool for mental health disorders.32 Fourth, this study analysed female military personnel's military characteristics and working environments, in addition to their mental health. Globally, our study supports evidence of the impact of sexual harassment on mental health. In addition, this study provides results that can potentially be used to develop policies to address sexual harassment.

Our study has several limitations. First, because it was cross-sectional, it was not possible to identify a causal relationship between the experience of sexual harassment and mental health. Second, male military personnel also experience sexual harassment, and this issue was not explored. In addition, previous studies showed a detrimental effect on the mental health of men when they were victims of sexual harassment.33 However, in the 2014 MHS, we could not find any reports of sexual harassment among male military personnel. Third, because of limited access to data, we did not review the clinical records of military personnel with mental health problems. Therefore, we were unable to identify which military personnel had been diagnosed with mental disorders. Fourth, we could not identify the length of being sexually harassed and its impact on functioning within the workplace. Lastly, there was no available information about the offender of sexual harassment.

Based on this research, in order to protect the most vulnerable within the military, it is essential for the military to enforce the sexual harassment prevention policies. A previous study showed that receiving medical care decreased a woman's risk of further sexual assault.34 Following sexual harassment, psychiatric treatment and ongoing management are integral to prevent worsening of mental health. Future studies should focus on the effects of sexual harassment on mental health based on the identity of the offender and the impact of psychiatric treatment after the experience of sexual harassment, as well as an association with the length of being sexually harassed and mental health and the impact of sexual harassment on functioning within the workplace. New findings would have important implications for sexual harassment policymaking.

Conclusion

We have confirmed that there is a differentiable relationship between the experience of sexual harassment and mental health. We also verified that the relationship was impacted by female military personnel's service classification and length of service. The results provide helpful information to minimise negative psychological effects after sexual harassment and to promote sexual harassment prevention policy.