| Literature DB >> 27084775 |
Thomas Frank1, Martin Bramböck2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Climate warming is a challenge for many plants and animals as they have to respond to rising temperature. Rising temperature was observed to affect herbivores and predators. Activity-density of abundant predatory carabid beetles, which are considered important natural control agents of agricultural pests, was observed to increase at rising temperature. The pollen beetle Meligethes aeneus is one of the most important insect pests in European oilseed rape fields, and its larvae were observed to be important prey to carabid beetles. Therefore, we performed a laboratory experiment to detect whether rising temperature affects the number of pollen beetle larvae killed by five abundant carabids, and larval biomass ingested by carabids. In three climate chambers actual temperature (T1) was compared to temperatures increased by 3 °C (T2) and 5 °C (T3). This is the first study investigating the feeding of carabid predators on an arable pest insect spanning a realistic forecasted climate warming scenario of 3 and 5 °C, thus providing basic knowledge on that neglected research area. We hypothesized that carabids kill more pollen beetle larvae at rising temperature, and biomass intake by carabids increases with rising temperature.Entities:
Keywords: Biological pest control; Biomass intake; Carabid beetles; Climate warming; Feeding activity; Killing rate; Meligethes aeneus; Pollen beetle; Predator-pest interaction; Temperature increase
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27084775 PMCID: PMC4833911 DOI: 10.1186/s12898-016-0076-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ecol ISSN: 1472-6785 Impact factor: 2.964
GLM showing the influence of carabid beetle species and temperature on the dependent variables number of killed pollen beetle larvae and intake of larval pollen beetle biomass
| Dependent variable | Beetle species | Temperature | Beetle species × Temperature | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D.f. | F |
| D.f. | F |
| D.f. | F |
| |
| Larvae killed | 4 | 222.971 | <0.001 | 2 | 23.924 | <0.001 | 6 | 3.194 | 0.016 |
| Biomass intake | 4 | 146.708 | <0.001 | 2 | 9.481 | <0.001 | 6 | 1.837 | 0.097 |
The model for killed larvae was analyzed using Poisson distribution
Fig. 1Number of pollen beetle larvae killed by five carabid beetles. Actual temperature (T1) was compared to temperatures increased by 3 °C (T2) and 5 °C (T3). Box-Whisker plots show the medians, 25 and 75 % percentiles, 10 and 90 % percentiles, and outlying values outside the percentiles (open circle). Different letters denote significant differences among temperatures, ns no significant difference (Nemenyi, P < 0.05)
Fig. 2Intake of larval pollen beetle biomass by five carabid beetles. Actual temperature (T1) was compared to temperatures increased by 3 °C (T2) and 5 °C (T3). Box-Whisker plots show the medians, 25 and 75 % percentiles, 10 and 90 % percentiles, and outlying values outside the percentiles (open circle). Different letters denote significant differences among temperatures, ns no significant difference (Tukey, P < 0.05)
Number of pollen beetle larvae killed mg−1 and intake of larval pollen beetle biomass mg−1 by five carabid beetles
| Dependent variable (mg−1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larvae killed | 0.950 ± 0.008 a | 0.991 ± 0.006 b | 0.898 ± 0.005 c | 0.898 ± 0.005 c | 0.941 ± 0.005 a |
| Biomass intake | 0.894 ± 0.022 a | 1.010 ± 0.017 b | 0.697 ± 0.016 c | 0.713 ± 0.016 c | 0.834 ± 0.016 a |
Different letters denote significant differences among species (Tukey, P < 0.05; mean ± SE)