Literature DB >> 27083776

Invitation to cervical cancer screening does increase participation in Germany: Results from the MARZY study.

Kathrin Radde1, Andrea Gottschalk1, Ulrike Bussas2, Stefanie Schülein1, Dirk Schriefer1, Ulrike Seifert1, Anne Neumann1, Melanie Kaiser3, Maria Blettner3, Stefanie J Klug1.   

Abstract

The effect of different invitation models on participation in cervical cancer screening (CCS) was investigated in a randomized population-based cohort study in Germany. Participants were randomly selected via population registries and randomized into intervention Arm A (invitation letter) and Arm B (invitation letter and information brochure) or control Arm C (no invitation). The intervention and control arms were compared with regard to 3-year participation and the two invitation models were compared between intervention arms. Of the 7,758 eligible women aged 30-65 years, living in the city of Mainz and in the rural region of Mainz-Bingen, 5,265 were included in the analysis. Differences in proportions of women attending CCS were investigated and logistic regression was performed to analyze various factors influencing participation. In the intervention group, 91.8% participated in CCS compared to 85.3% in the control group (p < 0.0001), with a 6.6 percentage point increase in participation [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.6-8.6] and an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 2.69 (95% CI 2.15-3.37). Effect estimators increased to 21.9 percentage points (95% CI 16.7-27.1) and an OR of 3.64 (95% CI 2.74-4.82), respectively, when women who participated in screening annually were excluded from the analysis. The invitation letter was particularly effective among women with lower school education, migrant women and older women. No difference in participation was found between the intervention Arm A and Arm B. An accompanying information brochure did not motivate more women to undergo CCS. However, a written invitation statistically significantly increased participation in CCS in Germany.
© 2016 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  early detection of cancer; invitation letter; participation; randomized cohort study; uterine cervical neoplasm

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27083776     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  7 in total

1.  Colonoscopy in Germany-Important Steps Towards a National Screening Program.

Authors:  Stefanie J Klug
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Evaluation of Testicular Self Examination and Testicular Partner Examination in Medical versus Non-Medical Students.

Authors:  Stefan Vallo; Jennifer Kloft; Jon Jones; Patricia John; Wael Khoder; Walid Mahmud; Jens Mani
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2020-06-23

3.  Colposcopy non-attendance following an abnormal cervical cancer screening result: a prospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Linda A Liang; Sylke R Zeissig; Gunther Schauberger; Sophie Merzweiler; Kathrin Radde; Sabine Fischbeck; Hans Ikenberg; Maria Blettner; Stefanie J Klug
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 4.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Helen Staley; Aslam Shiraz; Norman Shreeve; Andrew Bryant; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Ketankumar Gajjar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-06

Review 5.  Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonah Musa; Chad J Achenbach; Linda C O'Dwyer; Charlesnika T Evans; Megan McHugh; Lifang Hou; Melissa A Simon; Robert L Murphy; Neil Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Poor adherence and low persistency rates for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Christina Wang; Vincent Chen; Vinh Vu; An Le; Linda Nguyen; Changqing Zhao; Carrie R Wong; Nghia Nguyen; Jiayi Li; Jian Zhang; Huy Trinh; Mindie H Nguyen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Organised Versus Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening in Urban and Rural Regions of Lithuania.

Authors:  Justina Paulauskiene; Rugile Ivanauskiene; Erika Skrodeniene; Janina Petkeviciene
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.