Literature DB >> 27083578

Association of lateral humeral offset with functional outcome and geometric restoration in stemless total shoulder arthroplasty.

Bakir Kadum1, Per Wahlström2, Shwan Khoschnau3, Göran Sjödén4, Arkan Sayed-Noor4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Restoration of shoulder geometry is desirable in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and thought to influence the postoperative clinical outcome. We aimed to study the association of postoperative lateral humeral offset (LHO) changes and clinical outcome, as well as to investigate the ability of stemless anatomic TSA to restore shoulder geometry.
METHODS: In patients with primary shoulder osteoarthritis who underwent stemless anatomic TSA, the preoperative and postoperative clinical outcome was measured. Shoulder geometry was measured on preoperative computed tomography for the osteoarthritic shoulder and contralateral healthy shoulder and on postoperative computed tomography for the operated shoulder.
RESULTS: Forty-four patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months (range, 12-50 months) were available for the study. Postoperatively, the clinical outcome measures improved. The postoperative difference in LHO between the operated shoulder and contralateral healthy shoulder was 1.3 ± 4.6 mm and was correlated with scores on the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire at 3 months (Pearson correlation = 0.36, P = .01) and visual analog scale for pain at rest (Pearson correlation = 0.30, P = .03) and with exertion (Pearson correlation = 0.34, P = .01) at 3 months. Lengthening of LHO was associated with worsening shoulder function at 3 months but not at 12 months. The postoperative shoulder geometric parameters were restored postoperatively to acceptable ranges.
CONCLUSION: The stemless anatomic TSA could restore shoulder geometry in an acceptable manner. At 3 months but not at 12 months, increased LHO had a negative effect on shoulder function and resulted in more shoulder pain at rest and with exertion but did not affect quality of life, health status, or range of motion.
Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stemless shoulder prosthesis; TESS shoulder prosthesis; lateral humeral offset; shoulder anatomy restoration; shoulder offset; total shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27083578     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  5 in total

Review 1.  Lateralized versus nonlateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yehia H Bedeir; Brian M Grawe; Magdy M Eldakhakhny; Ahmed H Waly
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-09

Review 2.  An update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current indications, new designs, same old problems.

Authors:  Thomas Kozak; Stefan Bauer; Gilles Walch; Saad Al-Karawi; William Blakeney
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-03-01

3.  An interpopulation comparison of 3-dimensional morphometric measurements of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  Adijat O Inyang; Stephen Roche; Sudesh Sivarasu
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-06-12

4.  Is global humeral head offset related to intramedullary canal width? A computer tomography morphometric study.

Authors:  Johannes Barth; Jérôme Garret; Achilleas Boutsiadis; Etienne Sautier; Laurent Geais; Hugo Bothorel; Arnaud Godenèche
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2018-09-12

Review 5.  The Evolution of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty-From the First Steps to Novel Implant Designs and Surgical Techniques.

Authors:  Julia K Frank; Paul Siegert; Fabian Plachel; Philipp R Heuberer; Stephanie Huber; Jakob E Schanda
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.