| Literature DB >> 27083287 |
Jamal Bamoulid1, Cécile Courivaud1, Thomas Crepin1, Clémence Carron2, Emilie Gaiffe3, Caroline Roubiou4, Caroline Laheurte5, Bruno Moulin6, Luc Frimat7, Philippe Rieu8, Christiane Mousson9, Antoine Durrbach10, Anne-Elisabeth Heng11, Jean-Michel Rebibou12, Philippe Saas13, Didier Ducloux14.
Abstract
Lack of clear identification of patients at high risk of acute rejection hampers the ability to individualize immunosuppressive therapy. Here we studied whether thymic function may predict acute rejection in antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-treated renal transplant recipients in 482 patients prospectively studied during the first year post-transplant of which 86 patients experienced acute rejection. Only CD45RA(+)CD31(+)CD4(+) T cell (recent thymic emigrant [RTE]) frequency (RTE%) was marginally associated with acute rejection in the whole population. This T-cell subset accounts for 26% of CD4(+) T cells. Pretransplant RTE% was significantly associated with acute rejection in ATG-treated patients (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.08) for each increased percent in RTE/CD4(+) T cells), but not in anti-CD25 monoclonal (αCD25 mAb)-treated patients. Acute rejection was significantly more frequent in ATG-treated patients with high pretransplant RTE% (31.2% vs. 16.4%) or absolute number of RTE/mm(3) (31.7 vs. 16.1). This difference was not found in αCD25 monclonal antibody-treated patients. Highest values of both RTE% (>31%, hazard ratio, 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-5.74) and RTE/mm(3) (>200/mm(3), hazard ratio, 3.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-8.70) were predictive of acute rejection in ATG-treated patients but not in patients having received αCD25 monoclonal antibody). Results were confirmed in a retrospective cohort using T-cell receptor excision circle levels as a marker of thymic function. Thus, pretransplant thymic function predicts acute rejection in ATG-treated patients.Entities:
Keywords: CMV; acute graft rejection; immune senescence; thymus; transplantation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27083287 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2015.12.044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kidney Int ISSN: 0085-2538 Impact factor: 10.612