Literature DB >> 27082926

Factors affecting the persistence of drug-induced reprogramming of the cancer methylome.

Joshua S K Bell1, Jacob D Kagey1, Benjamin G Barwick1, Bhakti Dwivedi2, Michael T McCabe3, Jeanne Kowalski2,4, Paula M Vertino2,3.   

Abstract

Aberrant DNA methylation is a critical feature of cancer. Epigenetic therapy seeks to reverse these changes to restore normal gene expression. DNA demethylating agents, including 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (DAC), are currently used to treat certain leukemias, and can sensitize solid tumors to chemotherapy and immunotherapy. However, it has been difficult to pin the clinical efficacy of these agents to specific demethylation events, and the factors that contribute to the durability of response remain largely unknown. Here we examined the genome-wide kinetics of DAC-induced DNA demethylation and subsequent remethylation after drug withdrawal in breast cancer cells. We find that CpGs differ in both their susceptibility to demethylation and propensity for remethylation after drug removal. DAC-induced demethylation was most apparent at CpGs with higher initial methylation levels and further from CpG islands. Once demethylated, such sites exhibited varied remethylation potentials. The most rapidly remethylating CpGs regained >75% of their starting methylation within a month of drug withdrawal. These sites had higher pretreatment methylation levels, were enriched in gene bodies, marked by H3K36me3, and tended to be methylated in normal breast cells. In contrast, a more resistant class of CpG sites failed to regain even 20% of their initial methylation after 3 months. These sites had lower pretreatment methylation levels, were within or near CpG islands, marked by H3K79me2 or H3K4me2/3, and were overrepresented in sites that become aberrantly hypermethylated in breast cancers. Thus, whereas DAC-induced demethylation affects both endogenous and aberrantly methylated sites, tumor-specific hypermethylation is more slowly regained, even as normal methylation promptly recovers. Taken together, these data suggest that the durability of DAC response is linked to its selective ability to stably reset at least a portion of the cancer methylome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5-aza-2′deoxycytidine; Cancer; DNA methylation; chromatin; epigenetic therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27082926      PMCID: PMC4889262          DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2016.1158364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epigenetics        ISSN: 1559-2294            Impact factor:   4.528


  59 in total

1.  Inhibiting DNA Methylation Causes an Interferon Response in Cancer via dsRNA Including Endogenous Retroviruses.

Authors:  Katherine B Chiappinelli; Pamela L Strissel; Alexis Desrichard; Huili Li; Christine Henke; Benjamin Akman; Alexander Hein; Neal S Rote; Leslie M Cope; Alexandra Snyder; Vladimir Makarov; Sadna Budhu; Sadna Buhu; Dennis J Slamon; Jedd D Wolchok; Drew M Pardoll; Matthias W Beckmann; Cynthia A Zahnow; Taha Merghoub; Taha Mergoub; Timothy A Chan; Stephen B Baylin; Reiner Strick
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  The Polycomb group protein EZH2 directly controls DNA methylation.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Viré; Carmen Brenner; Rachel Deplus; Loïc Blanchon; Mario Fraga; Céline Didelot; Lluis Morey; Aleyde Van Eynde; David Bernard; Jean-Marie Vanderwinden; Mathieu Bollen; Manel Esteller; Luciano Di Croce; Yvan de Launoit; François Fuks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Targeting of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine residues by chromatin-associated DNMT1 induces proteasomal degradation of the free enzyme.

Authors:  Katan Patel; Jacqueline Dickson; Shahida Din; Kenneth Macleod; Duncan Jodrell; Bernard Ramsahoye
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Epigenetic targeting of ovarian cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Yinu Wang; Horacio Cardenas; Fang Fang; Salvatore Condello; Pietro Taverna; Matthew Segar; Yunlong Liu; Kenneth P Nephew; Daniela Matei
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Safety and clinical activity of the combination of 5-azacytidine, valproic acid, and all-trans retinoic acid in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Andres O Soriano; Hui Yang; Stefan Faderl; Zeev Estrov; Francis Giles; Farhad Ravandi; Jorge Cortes; William G Wierda; Souzanne Ouzounian; Andres Quezada; Sherry Pierce; Elihu H Estey; Jean-Pierre J Issa; Hagop M Kantarjian; Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  UHRF1 targets DNMT1 for DNA methylation through cooperative binding of hemi-methylated DNA and methylated H3K9.

Authors:  Xiaoli Liu; Qinqin Gao; Pishun Li; Qian Zhao; Jiqin Zhang; Jiwen Li; Haruhiko Koseki; Jiemin Wong
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Early epigenetic changes and DNA damage do not predict clinical response in an overlapping schedule of 5-azacytidine and entinostat in patients with myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Tamer E Fandy; James G Herman; Patrick Kerns; Anchalee Jiemjit; Elizabeth A Sugar; Si-Ho Choi; Allen S Yang; Timothy Aucott; Tianna Dauses; Rosalie Odchimar-Reissig; Jonathan Licht; Melanie J McConnell; Chris Nasrallah; Marianne K H Kim; Weijia Zhang; Yezou Sun; Anthony Murgo; Igor Espinoza-Delgado; Katharine Oteiza; Ibitayo Owoeye; Lewis R Silverman; Steven D Gore; Hetty E Carraway
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Rate of elongation by RNA polymerase II is associated with specific gene features and epigenetic modifications.

Authors:  Artur Veloso; Killeen S Kirkconnell; Brian Magnuson; Benjamin Biewen; Michelle T Paulsen; Thomas E Wilson; Mats Ljungman
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  GC skew defines distinct RNA polymerase pause sites in CpG island promoters.

Authors:  Wendy A Kellner; Joshua S K Bell; Paula M Vertino
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Redistribution of H3K27me3 upon DNA hypomethylation results in de-repression of Polycomb target genes.

Authors:  James P Reddington; Sara M Perricone; Colm E Nestor; Judith Reichmann; Neil A Youngson; Masako Suzuki; Diana Reinhardt; Donncha S Dunican; James G Prendergast; Heidi Mjoseng; Bernard H Ramsahoye; Emma Whitelaw; John M Greally; Ian R Adams; Wendy A Bickmore; Richard R Meehan
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  5 in total

1.  Orphan CpG islands define a novel class of highly active enhancers.

Authors:  Joshua S K Bell; Paula M Vertino
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 4.528

2.  DNA methylation reprogramming of human cancer cells by expression of a plant 5-methylcytosine DNA glycosylase.

Authors:  Teresa Morales-Ruiz; María Victoria García-Ortiz; Iván Devesa-Guerra; Laura Raya-Ruiz; Juan R Tejedor; Gustavo F Bayón; Marta I Sierra; Mario F Fraga; Rafael R Ariza; Teresa Roldán-Arjona
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.528

3.  A New Role for ERα: Silencing via DNA Methylation of Basal, Stem Cell, and EMT Genes.

Authors:  Eric A Ariazi; John C Taylor; Michael A Black; Emmanuelle Nicolas; Michael J Slifker; Diana J Azzam; Jeff Boyd
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 4.  H3K36 trimethylation-mediated biological functions in cancer.

Authors:  Chu Xiao; Tao Fan; He Tian; Yujia Zheng; Zheng Zhou; Shuofeng Li; Chunxiang Li; Jie He
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 6.551

5.  The Contrasting Delayed Effects of Transient Exposure of Colorectal Cancer Cells to Decitabine or Azacitidine.

Authors:  Alicja Pawlak; Kinga Chybicka; Ewa Zioło; Leon Strządała; Wojciech Kałas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.