Literature DB >> 27082437

A dual center study to compare breath volatile organic compounds from smokers and non-smokers with and without COPD.

A Gaida1, O Holz, C Nell, S Schuchardt, B Lavae-Mokhtari, L Kruse, U Boas, J Langejuergen, M Allers, S Zimmermann, C Vogelmeier, A R Koczulla, J M Hohlfeld.   

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that breath volatile organic compounds (VOC) have the potential to support the diagnosis and management of inflammatory diseases such as COPD. In this study we used a novel breath sampling device to search for COPD related VOCs. We included a large number of healthy controls and patients with mild to moderate COPD, recruited subjects at two different sites and carefully controlled for smoking. 222 subjects were recruited in Hannover and Marburg, and inhaled cleaned room air before exhaling into a stainless steel reservoir under exhalation flow control. Breath samples (2.5 l) were continuously drawn onto two Tenax(®) TA adsorption tubes and analyzed in Hannover using thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TD-GC-MS). Data of 134 identified VOCs from 190 subjects (52 healthy non-smokers, 52 COPD ex-smokers, 49 healthy smokers, 37 smokers with COPD) were included into the analysis. Active smokers could be clearly discriminated by higher values for combustion products and smoking related VOCs correlated with exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), indicating the validity of our data. Subjects from the study sites could be discriminated even after exclusion of cleaning related VOCs. Linear discriminant analysis correctly classified 89.4% of COPD patients in the non/ex-smoking group (cross validation (CV): 85.6%), and 82.6% of COPD patients in the actively smoking group (CV: 77.9%). We extensively characterized 134 breath VOCs and provide evidence for 14 COPD related VOCs of which 10 have not been reported before. Our results show that, for the utilization of breath VOCs for diagnosis and disease management of COPD, not only the known effects of smoking but also site specific differences need to be considered. We detected novel COPD related breath VOCs that now need to be tested in longitudinal studies for reproducibility, response to treatment and changes in disease severity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27082437     DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/10/2/026006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breath Res        ISSN: 1752-7155            Impact factor:   3.262


  19 in total

Review 1.  Breathomics for the clinician: the use of volatile organic compounds in respiratory diseases.

Authors:  Wadah Ibrahim; Liesl Carr; Rebecca Cordell; Michael J Wilde; Dahlia Salman; Paul S Monks; Paul Thomas; Chris E Brightling; Salman Siddiqui; Neil J Greening
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and assessment of treatment response through analyses of volatile compound patterns in exhaled breath samples.

Authors:  Nicola M Zetola; Chawangwa Modongo; Ogopotse Matsiri; Tsaone Tamuhla; Bontle Mbongwe; Keikantse Matlhagela; Enoch Sepako; Alexandro Catini; Giorgio Sirugo; Eugenio Martinelli; Roberto Paolesse; Corrado Di Natale
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 6.072

Review 3.  Breath Analysis: A Promising Tool for Disease Diagnosis-The Role of Sensors.

Authors:  Maria Kaloumenou; Evangelos Skotadis; Nefeli Lagopati; Efstathios Efstathopoulos; Dimitris Tsoukalas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Distinguish oral-source VOCs and control their potential impact on breath biomarkers.

Authors:  Dianlong Ge; Jijuan Zhou; Yajing Chu; Yan Lu; Xue Zou; Lei Xia; Yawei Liu; Chaoqun Huang; Chengyin Shen; Liwei Zhang; Huanzhong Wang; Yannan Chu
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Short-Term Effect of Cigarette Smoke on Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds Profile Analyzed by an Electronic Nose.

Authors:  Silvano Dragonieri; Vitaliano Nicola Quaranta; Enrico Buonamico; Claudia Battisti; Teresa Ranieri; Pierluigi Carratu; Giovanna Elisiana Carpagnano
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13

Review 6.  Evolution of clinical and environmental health applications of exhaled breath research: Review of methods and instrumentation for gas-phase, condensate, and aerosols.

Authors:  M Ariel Geer Wallace; Joachim D Pleil
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 6.558

7.  Effects of Sampling Conditions and Environmental Factors on Fecal Volatile Organic Compound Analysis by an Electronic Nose Device.

Authors:  Daniel J C Berkhout; Marc A Benninga; Ruby M van Stein; Paul Brinkman; Hendrik J Niemarkt; Nanne K H de Boer; Tim G J de Meij
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  The Role of Electronic Noses in Phenotyping Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Simone Scarlata; Panaiotis Finamore; Martina Meszaros; Silvano Dragonieri; Andras Bikov
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-11

9.  Protocol for an observational study to identify potential predictors of an acute exacerbation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (the PACE Study).

Authors:  Klaus Kenn; Rainer Gloeckl; Daniela Leitl; Tessa Schneeberger; Inga Jarosch; Wolfgang Hitzl; Peter Alter; Bernd Sczepanski; Sandra Winterkamp; Martina Boensch; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Chrysanthi Skevaki; Olaf Holz; Paul W Jones; Claus F Vogelmeier; Andreas R Koczulla
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Exhaled breath analysis: a review of 'breath-taking' methods for off-line analysis.

Authors:  Oluwasola Lawal; Waqar M Ahmed; Tamara M E Nijsen; Royston Goodacre; Stephen J Fowler
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 4.290

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.