Literature DB >> 27081390

Factor Structure of the Clinician-Rated Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity in Patients with Schizophrenia.

Seon-Cheol Park1, Kang Uk Lee2, Joonho Choi3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27081390      PMCID: PMC4823205          DOI: 10.4306/pi.2016.13.2.253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Investig        ISSN: 1738-3684            Impact factor:   2.505


× No keyword cloud information.
DSM-5 has proposed the use of the Clinician-Rated Dimension of Psychosis Symptom Severity (CRDPSS) for evaluating the various symptoms of schizophrenia.1 The 8-domain CRDPSS was developed from the perspective of deconstructing the psychopathology of schizophrenia and would be expected to provide baseline data for further advances in psychiatric nosology.2 In considering trends in psychiatric nosology, Panas3 has suggested that phenomenological Gestalt has faded into oblivion in the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia and that psychiatric nosology has regressed to a pre-Kraepelinian state. To our knowledge, despite these discussions, the dimensional structure of the CRDPSS has hardly been studied. We therefore aimed to identify the factor solution of the CRDPSS. As described elsewhere,4 166 in patients with schizophrenia (diagnosed with the DSM-5),5 age ≥18 years and ≤65 years, and length of hospital stay ≥2 weeks were recruited in Korea. Half were men (51.5%). Their mean age and age at onset were 46.5 (SD=11.2) and 25.2 (SD=13.2) years, respectively, and the mean chlorpromazine equivalent dose of antipsychotic prescriptions was 921.1 (SD=952.0) mg. Mean scores on the hallucinations, delusions, disorganized speech, abnormal psychomotor behaviors, negative symptoms, impaired cognition, depression and mania were 2.04 (SD=1.30), 2.27 (SD=1.16), 1.62 (SD=1.35), 1.16 (SD=1.16), 2.01 (SD=1.24), 1.22 (SD=1.22), 0.51 (SD=0.70) and 0.19 (SD= 0.48), respectively. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on the CRDPSS, with principle components extracted by the varimax method. The number of factor in the solution was estimated on a scree plot, using eigenvalues >1.6 In addition, only a loading >0.40 was considered to reveal a clear factor structure and content. As a result, Bartlett's test for sphericity was significant [χ2 (166)=468.72, p<0.001], and the total variance of the factor solution was 70.69%. Table 1 gives the factor loadings for a three-factor solution. The first factor consists of the domains for delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech and abnormal psychomotor behavior, and is designated "positive/speech". The second factor consists of the domains for negative symptoms and impaired cognition, and is named "negative/cognition". The third factor consists of the domains for depression and mania, and is designated "depression/mania". In addition, Pearson's correlations between the factor scores on the CRDPSS and the total and subscale scores on other measurement tools were obtained. Scores on the positive/speech factor were significantly correlated with scores on the positive symptoms subscale [Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)]7 (r=0.81, p<0.01), negative symptoms subscale (BPRS)7 (r=0.62, p<0.01), resistance subscale (BPRS)7 (r=0.44, p<0.01), Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language and Communication (TLC scale)8 (r=0.64, p<0.01), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS)9 (r=-0.32, p<0.01), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)10 (r=0.58, p<0.01) and Clinical Global Impression of severity (CGI-S)11 (r=0.85, p<0.01). Scores on the negative/cognition factor were correlated with scores on the negative symptoms subscale (BPRS) (r=0.35, p<0.01), resistance subscale (BPRS) (r=0.38, p<0.01), TLC scale (r=0.40, p<0.01) and CDSS (r= 0.17, p=0.03), and scores on the depression/mania factor were correlated with scores on the psychological discomfort subscale (BPRS)7 (r=0.25, p<0.01), the CDSS (r=0.17, p<0.01) and the YMRS (r=0.81, p<0.01).
Table 1

Three-factor solution of the CRDPSS (N=166)

CRDPSS: Clinician-Rated Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity

Our investigation has the virtue of pioneering research into the evaluation of patients with schizophrenia using the CRDPSS. In summary, it shows that the 8-domain CRDSS has a three-factor structure, consisting of positive/speech, negative/cognition and depression/mania factors. Pearson's correlations indicate that all three factors have favorable concurrent and divergent validity. Hence, our findings shed light on the heterogeneous symptom components of schizophrenia.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Logic and justification for dimensional assessment of symptoms and related clinical phenomena in psychosis: relevance to DSM-5.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Juan Bustillo; Wolfgang Gaebel; Raquel Gur; Stephan Heckers; Dolores Malaspina; Michael J Owen; Susan Schultz; Rajiv Tandon; Ming Tsuang; Jim Van Os; William Carpenter
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language, and Communication.

Authors:  Seon-Cheol Park; Eun Young Jang; Kang Uk Lee; Kounseok Lee; Hwa-Young Lee; Joonho Choi
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.735

3.  New subscales for an anchored version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: construction, reliability, and validity in acute psychiatric admissions.

Authors:  D Lachar; S E Bailley; H M Rhoades; A Espadas; M Aponte; K A Cowan; P Gummattira; C R Kopecky; A Wassef
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2001-09

4.  A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity.

Authors:  R C Young; J T Biggs; V E Ziegler; D A Meyer
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 9.319

5.  A depression rating scale for schizophrenics.

Authors:  D Addington; J Addington; B Schissel
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Thought, language, and communication in schizophrenia: diagnosis and prognosis.

Authors:  N C Andreasen; W M Grove
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 7.  Structure of the psychotic disorders classification in DSM-5.

Authors:  Stephan Heckers; Deanna M Barch; Juan Bustillo; Wolfgang Gaebel; Raquel Gur; Dolores Malaspina; Michael J Owen; Susan Schultz; Rajiv Tandon; Ming Tsuang; Jim Van Os; William Carpenter
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  The Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale: a simple instrument to measure the diversity of symptoms present in schizophrenia.

Authors:  J M Haro; S A Kamath; S Ochoa; D Novick; K Rele; A Fargas; M J Rodríguez; R Rele; J Orta; A Kharbeng; S Araya; M Gervin; J Alonso; V Mavreas; E Lavrentzou; N Liontos; K Gregor; P B Jones
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl       Date:  2003
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Preliminary Evaluation of Washington State's Early Intervention Program for First-Episode Psychosis.

Authors:  Oladunni Oluwoye; Hailey Reneau; Bryony Stokes; Rebecca Daughtry; Elizabeth Venuto; Tenaya Sunbury; Grace Hong; Barbara Lucenko; Bryan Stiles; Sterling M McPherson; Sarah Kopelovich; Maria Monroe-DeVita; Michael G McDonell
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Multimodal Assessment of Schizophrenia and Depression Utilizing Video, Acoustic, Locomotor, Electroencephalographic, and Heart Rate Technology: Protocol for an Observational Study.

Authors:  Robert O Cotes; Mina Boazak; Emily Griner; Zifan Jiang; Bona Kim; Whitney Bremer; Salman Seyedi; Ali Bahrami Rad; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-07-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.