| Literature DB >> 27081371 |
João Tavares Calixto Júnior1, Selene Maia de Morais1, Celeste Vega Gomez2, Cathia Coronel Molas2, Miriam Rolon2, Aline Augusti Boligon3, Margareth Linde Athayde3, Cícera Datiane de Morais Oliveira4, Saulo Relison Tintino4, Melo Coutinho Henrique Douglas4.
Abstract
This work describes the antiparasitic and cytotoxic activities of three plant species from the Cerrado biome, Northeastern Brazil. Significant antiparasitic inhibition was observed against Trypanosoma cruzi (63.86%), Leishmania brasiliensis (92.20%) and Leishmania infantum (95.23%) when using ethanol extract from leaves of Guazuma ulmifolia Lam. (Malvaceae), at a concentration of 500 μg/mL. However, low levels of inhibition were observed when assessing leishmanicidal and trypanocidal (Clone CL-B5) activities of crude ethanol extracts from leaves and bast tissue of Luehea paniculata (Malvaceae) and leaves and bark of Prockia crucis (Salicaceae) at a concentration of 500 μg/mL. The extracts revealed the presence of phenolic acids such as gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid and rosmarinic acid, as well as flavonoids such as rutin, luteolin, apigenin and quercetin - the latter detected only in G. ulmifolia. G. ulmifolia extract displayed higher leishmanicidal activity probably due to the presence of quercetin, a potent known leishmanicidal compound. A cytotoxicity test indicated values over 50% at the highest concentration (1000 μg/mL) for all natural products, which were considered cytotoxic. This points out the need for further tests to enable future in vivo trials, including antineoplastic activity on human tumor cells.Entities:
Keywords: Guazuma ulmifolia; Leishmanicidal activity; Luehea paniculata; Prockia crucis; Trypanocidal activity
Year: 2015 PMID: 27081371 PMCID: PMC4818332 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.10.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Plant species and parts used in the antiparasitic and cytotoxicity tests.
| Species | Family | Plant part | Exsiccate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malvaceae | Leaves and bast tissue | 54.641 | |
| Salicaceae | Leaves and bark | 54.741 | |
| Malvaceae | Leaves | 54.743 |
Dry weight and yield of the crude ethanol extracts.
| Natural product | Solvent | Dry matter (g) | Crude extract (g) | Extract yields (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EELPL | Ethanol | 595 | 61.649 | 10.36 |
| EELPB | Ethanol | 195 | 36.621 | 18.78 |
| EEPCL | Ethanol | 481 | 49.786 | 10.35 |
| EEPC | Ethanol | 247 | 23.604 | 9.55 |
| EEGUL | Ethanol | 558 | 54.457 | 9.76 |
EELPL = Ethanolic extract of L. paniculata leaves; EELPB = Ethanolic extract of L. paniculata bast; EEPCL = Ethanolic extract of P. crucis leaves; EEPC = Ethanolic extract of P.crucis bark; EEGUL = Ethanolic extract of G. ulmifolia leaves; AP(Li) = Antipromastigote activity of L. infantum; AP(Lb) = Antipromastigote activity of L. brasiliensis; AE = Antiepimastigote activity (T. cruzi); DS = Standard deviation.
Figure 1Graph showing the percent cytotoxicity of extracts under study on murine fibroblasts. In which: (*) LC50 values (median lethal concentration capable of killing 50% of tested cells); (**) LC50 value over concentration of 1000 μg/mL.
Antipromastigote activities of L. brasiliensis and L. infantum and antiepimastigote activity (T. cruzi) of ethanol extracts from three species native to a fragment of Cerrado in Northeastern Brazil.
| Natural product | Conc. (μg/mL) | %AP(Li) | ± %DS | %AP(Lb) | ± %DS | %AE | ± %DS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EELPL | 1000 | 35.32 | 1.19 | 39.00 | 0.22 | 28.30 | 1.98 |
| 500 | 30.56 | 1.05 | 27.64 | 0.22 | 23.18 | 0.57 | |
| 250 | 17.13 | 0.61 | 19.18 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 3.39 | |
| EELPB | 1000 | 1.15 | 0.39 | 29.39 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 0.42 |
| 500 | 0.00 | 1.99 | 25.69 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.49 | |
| 250 | 0.00 | 1.61 | 19.57 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 3.46 | |
| EEFPC | 1000 | 49.98 | 1.07 | 45.65 | 0.15 | 55.82 | 1.56 |
| 500 | 25.34 | 0.41 | 29.22 | 0.12 | 25.96 | 1.56 | |
| 250 | 18.24 | 0.14 | 21.12 | 1.17 | 14.46 | 0.92 | |
| EECPC | 1000 | 23.25 | 0.07 | 23.26 | 1.37 | 25.28 | 1.12 |
| 500 | 13.59 | 0.75 | 14.42 | 0.23 | 10.68 | 0.26 | |
| 250 | 10.39 | 0.57 | 11.18 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 1.24 | |
| EEFGU | 1000 | 95.45 | 0.72 | 92.36 | 0.17 | 63.86 | 1.20 |
| 500 | 95.23 | 0.39 | 92.20 | 0.04 | 61.15 | 0.99 | |
| 250 | 28.27 | 0.45 | 42.22 | 0.01 | 24.32 | 1.91 | |
| 125 | 5.80 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 4.03 | 0.99 | |
EELPL = Ethanolic extract of L. paniculata leaves; EELPB = Ethanolic extract of L. paniculata bast; EEPCL = Ethanolic extract of P. crucis leaves; EEPC = Ethanolic extract of P.crucis bark; EEGUL = Ethanolic extract of G. ulmifolia leaves; AP(Li) = Antipromastigote activity of L. infantum; AP(Lb) = Antipromastigote activity of L. brasiliensis; AE = Antiepimastigote activity (T. cruzi); DS = Standard deviation.
Figure 2Representative high performance liquid chromatography profile for L. paniculata leaves extract (A); L. paniculata sapwood extract (B); P. crucis leaves extract (C); P. crucis bark extract (D); G. ulmifolia leaves extract (E). Detection UV was at 325 nm, where: (A and B): gallic acid (peak 1), chlorogenic acid (peak 2), vitexin (peak 3), rosmarinic acid (peak 4), rutin (peak 5) and luteolin (peak 6); (C and D): gallic acid (peak 1), chlorogenic acid (peak 2), caffeic acid (peak 3), coumarin (peak 4), rutin (peak 5), quercitrin (peak 6), kaempferol (peak 7), luteolin (peak 8) and apigenin (peak 9); (E): catechin (peak 1), chlorogenic acid (peak 2), caffeic acid (peak 3), rutin (peak 4), quercitrin (peak 5), quercetin (peak 6) and luteolin (peak 7).