Literature DB >> 27080834

Pharmacovigilance in Europe: Place of the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) in organisation and decisional processes.

Marie-Laure Laroche1, Arnaud Batz2, Hélène Géniaux3, Corinne Féchant2, Louis Merle3, Patrick Maison2.   

Abstract

The new European legislation that came into force in July 2012 reinforced the organisation of pharmacovigilance by setting up a committee in charge of risk assessment for medicines, the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC). The PRAC has a remit covering the assessment of all aspects of the safety and the risk management of medicinal products for human use in the European Union. It deals with issues regarding pharmacovigilance signals, the periodic evaluation of benefit/risk reports from marketing authorization holders (MAH), risk management plans, post-marketing studies, variations or renewals of marketing authorisations, management of under surveillance drugs lists, inspections for pharmacovigilance reasons and audits of pharmacovigilance systems. The PRAC works with the pharmacovigilance systems of the European Member States, which draw up evaluation reports. These evaluations are circulated and discussed by Member States so as to issue recommendations, which serve as a basis for other European medicines committees, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) or the Coordination Group for Mutual Recognition and Decentralised Procedures-Human (CMDh) which then give their opinion. The final decision, which applies to all Member States and to the concerned MAH, lies with the European Commission (EC). This decisional procedure thus rests on coordination involving the PRAC, the CHMP, the CMDh, the EC, the Member States and the pharmaceutical companies. In the 3 years from July 2012, the PRAC has processed nearly 4500 procedures and is still facing an increasing workload.
Copyright © 2016 Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse drug reaction reporting system/organization and administration; Europe; Patient safety/legislation and jurisprudence; Pharmacovigilance; Product surveillance and post-marketing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27080834     DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2016.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Therapie        ISSN: 0040-5957            Impact factor:   2.070


  1 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacovigilance as Scientific Discovery: An Argument for Trans-Disciplinarity.

Authors:  Elena Rocca; Samantha Copeland; I Ralph Edwards
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.606

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.