Literature DB >> 27080633

Organisational impact: Definition and assessment methods for medical devices.

Christophe Roussel1, Cédric Carbonneil2, Antoine Audry3.   

Abstract

Health technology assessment (HTA) is a rapidly developing area and the value of taking non-clinical fields into consideration is growing. Although the health-economic aspect is commonly recognised, evaluating organisational impact has not been studied nearly as much. The goal of this work was to provide a definition of organisational impact in the sector of medical devices by defining its contours and exploring the evaluation methods specific to this field. Following an analysis of the literature concerning the impact of technologies on organisations as well as the medical literature, and also after reviewing the regulatory texts in this respect, the group of experts identified 12 types of organisational impact. A number of medical devices were carefully screened using the criteria grid, which proved to be operational and to differentiate properly. From the analysis of the practice and of the methods described, the group was then able to derive a few guidelines to successfully evaluate organisational impact. This work shows that taking organisational impact into consideration may be critical alongside of the other criteria currently in favour (clinically and economically). What remains is to confer a role in the decision-making process on this factor and one that meets the economic efficiency principle.
Copyright © 2016 Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Benchmarking; Biomedical; Efficiency; Equipment and supplies; Organisational innovation; Organizational; Technology assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27080633     DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2016.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Therapie        ISSN: 0040-5957            Impact factor:   2.070


  5 in total

Review 1.  Assessment and diffusion of medical innovations in France: an overview.

Authors:  Amélie Dubromel; Loïc Geffroy; Gilles Aulagner; Claude Dussart
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2018-04-04

2.  Investigation of Relationship Between Spatial Distribution of Medical Equipment and Preventable Mortality.

Authors:  Beata Gavurova; David Tucek; Viliam Kovac
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Critical Review of European Health-Economic Guidelines for the Health Technology Assessment of Medical Devices.

Authors:  Maximilian Blüher; Sita J Saunders; Virginie Mittard; Rafael Torrejon Torres; Jason A Davis; Rhodri Saunders
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-11-29

4.  Cost-utility analysis of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in non-treatment-resistant depression: the DISCO randomised controlled study protocol.

Authors:  Anne Sauvaget; Lydie Lagalice; Solène Schirr-Bonnans; Christelle Volteau; Morgane Péré; Cécile Dert; Annabelle Rivalland; Fabienne Tessier; Adeline Lepage; Agathe Tostivint; Thibault Deschamps; Véronique Thomas-Ollivier; Alison Robin; Noémie Pineau; Clémence Cabelguen; Nicolas Bukowski; Marie Guitteny; Auxane Beslot; Luc Simons; Hugopsy Network; Jean-Marie Vanelle; Giordano D'Urso; Samuel Bulteau; Valéry-Pierre Riche
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Organizational aspect in healthcare decision-making: a literature review.

Authors:  Amélie Dubromel; Marie-Audrey Duvinage-Vonesch; Loïc Geffroy; Claude Dussart
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2020-08-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.