Literature DB >> 27080369

Fractography of interface after microtensile bond strength test using swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Minh Nguyet Dao Luong1, Yasushi Shimada2, Alaa Turkistani3, Junji Tagami1, Yasunori Sumi4, Alireza Sadr5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of crosshead speed and placement technique on interfacial crack formation in microtensile bond strength (MTBS) test using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MTBS test beams (0.9×0.9mm(2)) were prepared from flat human dentin disks bonded with self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray) and universal composite (Clearfil AP-X, Kuraray) with or without flowable composite lining (Estelite Flow Quick, Tokuyama). Each beam was scanned under SS-OCT (Santec, Japan) at 1319nm center wavelength before MTBS test was performed at crosshead speed of either 1 or 10mm/min (n=10). The beams were scanned by SS-OCT again to detect and measure cracks at the debonded interface using digital image analysis software. Representative beams were observed under confocal laser scanning microscope to confirm the fractography findings.
RESULTS: Two-way ANOVA showed that for MTBS the crosshead speed was not a significant factor (p>0.05), while there was a difference between placement techniques (p<0.001), with flowable lining yielding higher mean values. On the other hand, for crack formation, there was a significant difference between crosshead speeds (p<0.01), while the placement technique did not show up as a statistically significant factor (p>0.05). The interaction of factors were not significant (p>0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: Testing MTBS samples at higher crosshead speeds induced more cracks in dentin. Lining with a flowable composite improved the bonding quality and increased the bond strength. SS-OCT can visualize interfacial cracks after restoration debonding.
Copyright © 2016 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crosshead speed; Dentin crack; Flowable composite; Fractography; Microtensile bond test; Optical coherence tomography (OCT)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27080369     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  5 in total

1.  Optical coherence tomography characterizes the roughness and thickness of the heterogeneous layer on cortical bone surface induced by Er:YAG laser ablation at different moisture contents.

Authors:  Wenyan Huang; Chudan Gao; Yintao Lan; Sujuan Zeng; Janak L Pathak; Miao Zhou; Lihong Ge; Jian Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-03

Review 2.  The Use of Optical Coherence Tomography in Dental Diagnostics: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Monika Machoy; Julia Seeliger; Liliana Szyszka-Sommerfeld; Robert Koprowski; Tomasz Gedrange; Krzysztof Woźniak
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 2.682

3.  Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots.

Authors:  Sharvaree Ratnakar Deshpande; Sunanda Laxman Gaddalay; Yogesh Naresh Damade; Unmesh Deepak Khanvilkar; Akshay Satish Chaudhari; Vaishali Anala
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2022-05-04

Review 4.  Assessment of Bonding Effectiveness of Adhesive Materials to Tooth Structure using Bond Strength Test Methods: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Aminah M El Mourad
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2018-09-28

5.  Diagnosis of Occlusal Caries with Dynamic Slicing of 3D Optical Coherence Tomography Images.

Authors:  Minh N Luong; Yasushi Shimada; Kazuyuki Araki; Masahiro Yoshiyama; Junji Tagami; Alireza Sadr
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.