Literature DB >> 27080161

Comparative analysis focusing on surgical and early oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopy-assisted, and robot-assisted approaches in rectal cancer patients.

Jin Cheon Kim1,2, Chang Sik Yu3, Seok-Byung Lim3, In Ja Park3, Chan Wook Kim3, Yong Sik Yoon3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Because there are few comparative studies of open, laparoscopy-assisted (LA), and robot-assisted (RA) total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer, we aimed to compare these three procedures in terms of sphincter-saving operation (SSO) achievement, surgical complications, and early oncological outcomes.
METHODS: The short-term outcomes of 2114 patients with rectal cancer consecutively enrolled between July 2010 and February 2015 at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) were retrospectively evaluated. Patients underwent either open, LA, or RA TME (n = 1095, 486, and 533, respectively) performed by experienced surgeons.
RESULTS: RA TME was a significant determinant of SSO in multivariate analysis that included potential variables such as tumor location and T4 category (odds ratio, 2.458; 95 % confidence interval, 1.497-4.036; p < 0.001). The cumulative rates of 3-year local recurrence, overall survival, and disease-free survival did not differ among the three groups: 2.5-3.4, 91.9-94.6, and 82.2-83.1 % (p = 0.85, 0.352, and 0.944, respectively). Early general surgical complications occurred more frequently in the open group than in the LA and RA groups (19.3 versus 13.0 versus 12.2 %, p < 0.001), specifically ileus and wound infection.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in 3-year survival outcomes and local recurrence among open, LA, and RA TME. RA TME is useful for SSO achievement, regardless of advanced stage and location of rectal cancer. The open procedure had a slightly but significantly higher incidence of postoperative complications than LA and RA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative analysis; Laparoscopy; Open; Rectal cancer; Robot-assisted

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27080161     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-016-2586-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  27 in total

1.  Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D G Jayne; H C Thorpe; J Copeland; P Quirke; J M Brown; P J Guillou
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  One hundred years of curative surgery for rectal cancer: 1908-2008.

Authors:  M M Lange; H J Rutten; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery.

Authors:  Jeong Yeon Kim; Nam-Kyu Kim; Kang Young Lee; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Jang Hwan Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Open versus robot-assisted sphincter-saving operations in rectal cancer patients: techniques and comparison of outcomes between groups of 100 matched patients.

Authors:  Jin C Kim; Sung S Yang; Tae Y Jang; Jae Y Kwak; Myung J Yun; Seok B Lim
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.547

5.  Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project.

Authors:  A L Martling; T Holm; L E Rutqvist; B J Moran; R J Heald; B Cedemark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Mirnezami; Reza Mirnezami; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Kishore Sasapu; Peter Sagar; Paul Finan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Advances and challenges in treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Joshua Smith; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Kin Wah Chu
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Koen C M J Peeters; Corrie A M Marijnen; Iris D Nagtegaal; Elma Klein Kranenbarg; Hein Putter; Theo Wiggers; Harm Rutten; Lars Pahlman; Bengt Glimelius; Jan Willem Leer; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sandra Vennix; Loeki Pelzers; Nicole Bouvy; Geerard L Beets; Jean-Pierre Pierie; Theo Wiggers; Stephanie Breukink
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-04-15
View more
  7 in total

1.  Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: results of a single high-volume center in Japan.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Yusuke Kinugasa; Akio Shiomi; Hiroyasu Kagawa; Yushi Yamakawa; Akinobu Furuatni; Shoichi Manabe; Yusuke Yamaoka; Hitoshi Hino
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: a comparative study of a single center.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Tao Zhang; Zhi-Ming Zhao; Xiang-Long Tan; Guo-Dong Zhao; Xuan Zhang; Yong Xu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.

Authors:  Ka Ting Ng; Azlan Kok Vui Tsia; Vanessa Yu Ling Chong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Meta-analysis of Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ohtani; Kiyoshi Maeda; Shinya Nomura; Osamu Shinto; Yoko Mizuyama; Hiroji Nakagawa; Hisashi Nagahara; Masatsune Shibutani; Tatsunari Fukuoka; Ryosuke Amano; Kosei Hirakawa; Masaichi Ohira
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Comparison of clinical efficacy between robotic-laparoscopic excision and traditional laparoscopy for rectal cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhen Chen; Zhuo Li Zhu; Pingxi Wang; Fanwei Zeng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Robotic total meso-rectal excision for rectal cancer: A systematic review following the publication of the ROLARR trial.

Authors:  Katie Jones; Mohamed G Qassem; Parv Sains; Mirza K Baig; Muhammad S Sajid
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-11-15

7.  Comparing outcomes of robotic versus open mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Rosa M Jimenez-Rodriguez; Jessica Flynn; Sujata Patil; Maria Widmar; Felipe Quezada-Diaz; Patricio Lynn; Paul Strombom; Larissa Temple; Joshua J Smith; Iris H Wei; Emmanouil P Pappou; Jose G Guillem; Philip P Paty; Garrett M Nash; Martin R Weiser; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-11-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.