Laura B Zahodne1,2,3, Nicole Schupf2,4,5, Adam M Brickman1,2,3, Richard Mayeux1,2,3,4,5, Melanie M Wall4,6, Yaakov Stern1,2,3, Jennifer J Manly1,2,3. 1. Department of Neurology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. 2. Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. 3. Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. 5. Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA. 6. Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous research has identified multiple risk and protective factors for late onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD). However, it is not known whether these risk and protective factors differ for individuals who are cognitively stable versus those already experiencing declines. OBJECTIVE: This study examined how dementia risk factors differ across subgroups of older adults defined by memory trajectory. This line of research may lead to more individualized risk profiles. METHODS: Risk factors for incident LOAD were compared across previously-validated groups of older adults exhibiting different memory trajectories ("Stable-High," "Stable-Low," "Decliner," "Rapid Decliner") using stratified Cox regressions. Participants included 2,593 racially/ethnically diverse older adults (mean age of 76 at study entry) in the Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project. RESULTS: Predictors of incident dementia differed across trajectory groups: older age only incurred independent risk in stable groups, education did not incur independent protection in the rapidly declining group, depression only incurred independent risk in the stable-low group, stroke incurred independent risk in the two extreme groups, and APOE-ɛ4 only incurred independent risk in the rapidly declining group. CONCLUSION: The finding that different risk factors for LOAD were associated with specific memory trajectories may reflect the existence of resilience or vulnerability factors that modify the individual influences of risk/protective factors. This study highlights the utility of considering interactions between dementia risk factors and a patient's unique cognitive history.
BACKGROUND: Previous research has identified multiple risk and protective factors for late onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD). However, it is not known whether these risk and protective factors differ for individuals who are cognitively stable versus those already experiencing declines. OBJECTIVE: This study examined how dementia risk factors differ across subgroups of older adults defined by memory trajectory. This line of research may lead to more individualized risk profiles. METHODS: Risk factors for incident LOAD were compared across previously-validated groups of older adults exhibiting different memory trajectories ("Stable-High," "Stable-Low," "Decliner," "Rapid Decliner") using stratified Cox regressions. Participants included 2,593 racially/ethnically diverse older adults (mean age of 76 at study entry) in the Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project. RESULTS: Predictors of incident dementia differed across trajectory groups: older age only incurred independent risk in stable groups, education did not incur independent protection in the rapidly declining group, depression only incurred independent risk in the stable-low group, stroke incurred independent risk in the two extreme groups, and APOE-ɛ4 only incurred independent risk in the rapidly declining group. CONCLUSION: The finding that different risk factors for LOAD were associated with specific memory trajectories may reflect the existence of resilience or vulnerability factors that modify the individual influences of risk/protective factors. This study highlights the utility of considering interactions between dementia risk factors and a patient's unique cognitive history.
Authors: Mary N Haan; Dan M Mungas; Hector M Gonzalez; Teresa A Ortiz; Ananth Acharya; William J Jagust Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: B L Plassman; K M Langa; G G Fisher; S G Heeringa; D R Weir; M B Ofstedal; J R Burke; M D Hurd; G G Potter; W L Rodgers; D C Steffens; R J Willis; R B Wallace Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2007-10-29 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Elżbieta Kuźma; Ilianna Lourida; Sarah F Moore; Deborah A Levine; Obioha C Ukoumunne; David J Llewellyn Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-08-31 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Christine E Walsh; Yang C Yang; Katsuya Oi; Allison Aiello; Daniel Belsky; Kathleen Mullan Harris; Brenda L Plassman Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2022-10-06 Impact factor: 4.942
Authors: Andrea R Zammit; Charles B Hall; Mindy J Katz; Graciela Muniz-Terrera; Ali Ezzati; David A Bennett; Richard B Lipton Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Shama D Karanth; Frederick A Schmitt; Peter T Nelson; Yuriko Katsumata; Richard J Kryscio; David W Fardo; Jordan P Harp; Erin L Abner Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Seonjoo Lee; Xingtao Zhou; Yizhe Gao; Badri Vardarajan; Dolly Reyes-Dumeyer; Kumar B Rajan; Robert S Wilson; Denis A Evans; Lilah M Besser; Walter A Kukull; David A Bennett; Adam M Brickman; Nicole Schupf; Richard Mayeux; Sandra Barral Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 3.240