Sophie Vandepitte1, Nele Van Den Noortgate2, Koen Putman3, Sofie Verhaeghe1, Kristof Faes1, Lieven Annemans1. 1. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Belgium. 2. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium. 3. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Medical Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dementia is known as a major public health problem affecting both patients and caregivers, and placing a high financial strain upon society. In community-dwelling patients, it is important to support informal caregivers in order to help them sustain their demanding role. Previous reviews about effectiveness of such supporting strategies often included a small number of studies, focused only on particular supportive types, particular outcomes, or solely on caregivers. OBJECTIVE: A general systematic review was conducted investigating effectiveness of different supportive strategies on at least the well-being of the caregiver or the care-recipient. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in Web of Science and PubMed. An adapted version of the Downs and Black (1998) checklist was used to assess methodological quality. A new classification was developed to group different types of caregiver support. RESULTS: Fifty-three papers met the inclusion criteria. Although 87% of the interventions were to some extent effective, methods and findings were rather inconsistent. Psychoeducational interventions generally lead to positive outcomes for caregivers, and delay permanent institutionalization of care-recipients. Cognitive behavioral therapy decreases dysfunctional thoughts among caregivers. Occupational therapy decreases behavioral problems among patients and improves self-efficacy of caregivers. In general, those interventions tailored on individual level generate better outcomes. Comparative research on respite care was very rare. CONCLUSIONS: Despite methodological inconsistency, supporting caregivers appears to be an effective strategy often improving well-being of caregiver or care-recipient and resulting in additional benefits for society. However, there is a need for more research on the (cost)-effectiveness of respite care.
BACKGROUND:Dementia is known as a major public health problem affecting both patients and caregivers, and placing a high financial strain upon society. In community-dwelling patients, it is important to support informal caregivers in order to help them sustain their demanding role. Previous reviews about effectiveness of such supporting strategies often included a small number of studies, focused only on particular supportive types, particular outcomes, or solely on caregivers. OBJECTIVE: A general systematic review was conducted investigating effectiveness of different supportive strategies on at least the well-being of the caregiver or the care-recipient. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in Web of Science and PubMed. An adapted version of the Downs and Black (1998) checklist was used to assess methodological quality. A new classification was developed to group different types of caregiver support. RESULTS: Fifty-three papers met the inclusion criteria. Although 87% of the interventions were to some extent effective, methods and findings were rather inconsistent. Psychoeducational interventions generally lead to positive outcomes for caregivers, and delay permanent institutionalization of care-recipients. Cognitive behavioral therapy decreases dysfunctional thoughts among caregivers. Occupational therapy decreases behavioral problems among patients and improves self-efficacy of caregivers. In general, those interventions tailored on individual level generate better outcomes. Comparative research on respite care was very rare. CONCLUSIONS: Despite methodological inconsistency, supporting caregivers appears to be an effective strategy often improving well-being of caregiver or care-recipient and resulting in additional benefits for society. However, there is a need for more research on the (cost)-effectiveness of respite care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alzheimer’s disease; caregiver; dementia; effectiveness; support
Authors: Sheryl Zimmerman; Philip D Sloane; Kimberly Ward; Anna Beeber; David Reed; Christine Lathren; Bobbi Matchar; Lisa Gwyther Journal: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 2.035
Authors: Sarah Iribarren; Samantha Stonbraker; Niurka Suero-Tejeda; Maribel Granja; José A Luchsinger; Mary Mittelman; Suzanne Bakken; Robert Lucero Journal: Inform Health Soc Care Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 2.439
Authors: Roderick A Corriveau; Walter J Koroshetz; Jordan T Gladman; Sophia Jeon; Debra Babcock; David A Bennett; S Thomas Carmichael; Susan L-J Dickinson; Dennis W Dickson; Marian Emr; Howard Fillit; Steven M Greenberg; Michael L Hutton; David S Knopman; Jennifer J Manly; Karen S Marder; Claudia S Moy; Creighton H Phelps; Paul A Scott; William W Seeley; Beth-Anne Sieber; Nina B Silverberg; Margaret L Sutherland; Angela Taylor; Christine L Torborg; Salina P Waddy; Amelie K Gubitz; David M Holtzman Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Klaus Pfeiffer; Martin Hautzinger; Margarete Patak; Julia Grünwald; Clemens Becker; Diana Albrecht Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Olga A Klein; Melanie Boekholt; Dilshad Afrin; Christina Dornquast; Adina Dreier-Wolfgramm; Armin Keller; Bernhard Michalowsky; Ina Zwingmann; Stefan Teipel; Jochen René Thyrian; Ingo Kilimann; Wolfgang Hoffmann Journal: Trials Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 2.279