Cesare Cozzarini1, Tiziana Rancati2, Fabio Badenchini1, Federica Palorini3, Barbara Avuzzi4, Claudio Degli Esposti5, Giuseppe Girelli6, Ilaria Improta3, Vittorio Vavassori7, Riccardo Valdagni2,4, Claudio Fiorino8. 1. Radiotherapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy. 2. Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. 3. Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. 4. Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. 5. Radiotherapy, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy. 6. Radiotherapy, Ospedale ASL9, Ivrea, Italy. 7. Radiotherapy, Cliniche Gavazzeni-Humanitas, Bergamo, Italy. 8. Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. fiorino.claudio@hsr.it.
Abstract
AIM: To assess the predictors of the onset of impotence 1 year after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multi-centric prospective study, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire-based potency of 91 hormone-naïve and potent patients (IIEF1-5 > 11 before radiotherapy) was assessed. At the time of this analysis, information on potency 1 year after treatment was available for 62 of 91 patients (42 treated with hypofractionation: 2.35-2.65 Gy/fr, 70-74.2 Gy; 20 with conventional fractionation: 74-78 Gy). Prospectively collected individual information and Dmax/Dmean to the penile bulb were available; the corresponding 2 Gy-equivalent values (EQD2_max/EQD2_mean) were also considered. Predictors of 1‑year impotency were assessed through uni- and multi-variable backward logistic regression: The best cut-off values discriminating between potent and impotent patients were assessed by ROC analyses. The discriminative power of the models and goodness-of-fit were measured by AUC analysis and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H&L) test. RESULTS: At 1‑year follow-up, 26 of 62 patients (42 %) became impotent. The only predictive variables were baseline IIEF1-5 values (best cut-off baseline IIEF1-5 ≥ 19), Dmax ≥ 68.5 Gy and EQD2_max ≥ 74.2 Gy. The risk of 1‑year impotence may be predicted by a two-variable model including baseline IIEF1-5 (OR: 0.80, p = 0.003) and EQD2_max ≥ 74.2 Gy (OR: 4.1, p = 0.022). The AUC of the model was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.64-0.87, p = 0.0007, H&L: p = 0.62). The 1‑year risk of impotency after high-dose radiotherapy in potent men depends on the EQD2_max to the penile bulb and on baseline IIEF1-5 values. CONCLUSION: A significant reduction in the risk may be expected mainly when sparing the bulb in patients with no/mild baseline impotency (IIEF1-5 > 17).
AIM: To assess the predictors of the onset of impotence 1 year after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multi-centric prospective study, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire-based potency of 91 hormone-naïve and potent patients (IIEF1-5 > 11 before radiotherapy) was assessed. At the time of this analysis, information on potency 1 year after treatment was available for 62 of 91 patients (42 treated with hypofractionation: 2.35-2.65 Gy/fr, 70-74.2 Gy; 20 with conventional fractionation: 74-78 Gy). Prospectively collected individual information and Dmax/Dmean to the penile bulb were available; the corresponding 2 Gy-equivalent values (EQD2_max/EQD2_mean) were also considered. Predictors of 1‑year impotency were assessed through uni- and multi-variable backward logistic regression: The best cut-off values discriminating between potent and impotentpatients were assessed by ROC analyses. The discriminative power of the models and goodness-of-fit were measured by AUC analysis and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H&L) test. RESULTS: At 1‑year follow-up, 26 of 62 patients (42 %) became impotent. The only predictive variables were baseline IIEF1-5 values (best cut-off baseline IIEF1-5 ≥ 19), Dmax ≥ 68.5 Gy and EQD2_max ≥ 74.2 Gy. The risk of 1‑year impotence may be predicted by a two-variable model including baseline IIEF1-5 (OR: 0.80, p = 0.003) and EQD2_max ≥ 74.2 Gy (OR: 4.1, p = 0.022). The AUC of the model was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.64-0.87, p = 0.0007, H&L: p = 0.62). The 1‑year risk of impotency after high-dose radiotherapy in potent men depends on the EQD2_max to the penile bulb and on baseline IIEF1-5 values. CONCLUSION: A significant reduction in the risk may be expected mainly when sparing the bulb in patients with no/mild baseline impotency (IIEF1-5 > 17).
Authors: Kent E Wallner; Gregory S Merrick; Mark L Benson; Wayne M Butler; Jeffrey Maki; Bryan G Tollenaar Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: A Magli; M Giangreco; M Crespi; A Negri; T Ceschia; G De Giorgi; F Titone; G Parisi; S Fongione Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-09-29 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Daniel Krauss; Larry Kestin; Hong Ye; Donald Brabbins; Michel Ghilezan; Gary Gustafson; Frank Vicini; Alvaro Martinez Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-06-26 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Lanea M M Keller; Mark K Buyyounouski; Dennis Sopka; Karen Ruth; Tracy Klayton; Alan Pollack; Deborah Watkins-Bruner; Richard Greenberg; Robert Price; Eric M Horwitz Journal: Urology Date: 2012-06-29 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Ugur Selek; Rex Cheung; Mingfwu Lii; Pamela Allen; Roy E Steadham; Terry R Vantreese; Darren J Little; Isaac I Rosen; Deborah Kuban Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Bradford S Hoppe; Romaine C Nichols; Randal H Henderson; Christopher G Morris; Christopher R Williams; Joseph Costa; Robert B Marcus; William M Mendenhall; Zuofeng Li; Nancy P Mendenhall Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Julia Murray; Sarah Gulliford; Clare Griffin; Anna Wilkins; Isabel Syndikus; John Staffurth; Miguel Panades; Christopher Scrase; Chris Parker; Vincent Khoo; Jamie Dean; Helen Mayles; Philip Mayles; Simon Thomas; Olivia Naismith; Helen Mossop; Clare Cruickshank; Emma Hall; David Dearnaley Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-12-31
Authors: Aleksandra Napieralska; Wojciech Majewski; Roland Kulik; Grzegorz Głowacki; Leszek Miszczyk Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 3.481