Areej Al Nemer1. 1. Department of Surgical Pathology, University of Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obtaining nonsurgical precise diagnosis of a palpable breast lesion is of paramount importance. Both core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine needle aspiration (FNA) are validated techniques used for this purpose. In this study, we compared the accuracy of both methods and explored whether combining both tests adds significant diagnostic value, and for the first time, we tested the concordance of tumor grading in parallel biopsies with reference to surgical excision (SE). METHODS: Patients underwent concurrent unguided FNA and CNB followed by SE were retrospectively recruited. Chi-square was used to compare the accuracy of malignancy detection, and tumor grade agreement was calculated using kappa (k) statistical test with reference to SE findings. RESULTS: All patients were females (n: 170). The median age was 45 years. Excluding 18 cases which had inadequate FNA, accuracy of FNA and CNB was 86.2% and 79.6%; respectively. Accuracy was 94.1% when we considered both tests together for any positive result. For tumor grading, the agreement was 91.6% for CNB and 98.8% for FNA. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic strength was comparable for both FNA and CNB, slightly more favorable for the former. Combination of both tests significantly minimized missing cases as false negative. When available, it is worthy to grade malignant FNA samples. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016;44:578-581.
BACKGROUND: Obtaining nonsurgical precise diagnosis of a palpable breast lesion is of paramount importance. Both core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine needle aspiration (FNA) are validated techniques used for this purpose. In this study, we compared the accuracy of both methods and explored whether combining both tests adds significant diagnostic value, and for the first time, we tested the concordance of tumor grading in parallel biopsies with reference to surgical excision (SE). METHODS:Patients underwent concurrent unguided FNA and CNB followed by SE were retrospectively recruited. Chi-square was used to compare the accuracy of malignancy detection, and tumor grade agreement was calculated using kappa (k) statistical test with reference to SE findings. RESULTS: All patients were females (n: 170). The median age was 45 years. Excluding 18 cases which had inadequate FNA, accuracy of FNA and CNB was 86.2% and 79.6%; respectively. Accuracy was 94.1% when we considered both tests together for any positive result. For tumor grading, the agreement was 91.6% for CNB and 98.8% for FNA. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic strength was comparable for both FNA and CNB, slightly more favorable for the former. Combination of both tests significantly minimized missing cases as false negative. When available, it is worthy to grade malignant FNA samples. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016;44:578-581.
Authors: Abdulkhaleq A Binnuhaid; Sultan Abdulwadoud Alshoabi; Fahad H Alhazmi; Tareef S Daqqaq; Suliman G Salih; Sami A Al-Dubai Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2019-12-10