Maria Waizel1,2, Annekatrin Rickmann2, Björn R Blanke3, Katharina Wolf2, Sara Kazerounian1,2, Peter Szurman2,3. 1. University Eye Hospital Basel, Centre for Ophthalmology, Basel - Switzerland. 2. Knappschaft Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach/Saar - Germany. 3. University Eye Clinic Tuebingen, Centre for Ophthalmology, Tuebingen - Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study the visual outcome and change in central macular thickness (CMT) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who were previously treated with aflibercept (VEGF Trap-Eye, Eylea) and were subsequently switched to bevacizumab (Avastin). METHODS: In this observational analysis, 19 eyes initially treated with at least 3 injections of bevacizumab after initial treatment with at least 3 injections of aflibercept are reported. Outcome measures were Snellen visual acuity (best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CMT measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: A total of 19 eyes initially treated with 6.5 ± 2.8 intravitreal injections of aflibercept were switched to 5.4 ± 3.2 injections of bevacizumab. Median BCVA decreased from 20/94 to 20/113 after aflibercept and increased slightly to 20/101 after bevacizumab (p = 0.84, Friedman test). Of all 19 eyes, 36.8% achieved gain in visual acuity of more than 1 line and 21.1% of more than 3 lines. The CMT decreased slightly from 433 ± 229 μm at baseline to 367 ± 198 μm after aflibercept treatment (p = 0.18, Wilcoxon test) and decreased statistically significantly to 335 ± 184 μm after bevacizumab treatment (p = 0.0065, Wilcoxon test). CONCLUSIONS: Switching from aflibercept to bevacizumab treatment has an equivalent anatomical effect in eyes with neovascular AMD as switching from bevacizumab to aflibercept. Therefore, switching back to bevacizumab might represent a reasonable therapy strategy to overcome tachyphylaxis during long-term monotherapy with aflibercept.
PURPOSE: To study the visual outcome and change in central macular thickness (CMT) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who were previously treated with aflibercept (VEGF Trap-Eye, Eylea) and were subsequently switched to bevacizumab (Avastin). METHODS: In this observational analysis, 19 eyes initially treated with at least 3 injections of bevacizumab after initial treatment with at least 3 injections of aflibercept are reported. Outcome measures were Snellen visual acuity (best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CMT measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: A total of 19 eyes initially treated with 6.5 ± 2.8 intravitreal injections of aflibercept were switched to 5.4 ± 3.2 injections of bevacizumab. Median BCVA decreased from 20/94 to 20/113 after aflibercept and increased slightly to 20/101 after bevacizumab (p = 0.84, Friedman test). Of all 19 eyes, 36.8% achieved gain in visual acuity of more than 1 line and 21.1% of more than 3 lines. The CMT decreased slightly from 433 ± 229 μm at baseline to 367 ± 198 μm after aflibercept treatment (p = 0.18, Wilcoxon test) and decreased statistically significantly to 335 ± 184 μm after bevacizumab treatment (p = 0.0065, Wilcoxon test). CONCLUSIONS: Switching from aflibercept to bevacizumab treatment has an equivalent anatomical effect in eyes with neovascular AMD as switching from bevacizumab to aflibercept. Therefore, switching back to bevacizumab might represent a reasonable therapy strategy to overcome tachyphylaxis during long-term monotherapy with aflibercept.