Literature DB >> 27078499

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair: Promising Anatomical and Functional Results.

Hylke J F Brenkman1, Kevin Parry1, Richard van Hillegersberg1, Jelle P Ruurda1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal technique for hiatal hernia (HH) repair, and considerable recurrence rates are reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perioperative outcomes, quality of life (QoL), and recurrence rate in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic HH repair.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic HH repair between July 2011 and March 2015 were evaluated. The procedure consisted of hernia sac reduction, crural repair without mesh, and Toupet fundoplication. Postoperative radiological imaging or endoscopy was performed in all symptomatic patients to exclude recurrence. Perioperative results were collected retrospectively from the patient records. QoL was evaluated with Short Form-36 (SF-36), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQOL), and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) questionnaires.
RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were identified. The majority (75%) had a type III HH. Median operation time was 118 (62-173) minutes; median blood loss was 20 (10-934) mL, and one procedure was converted to an open procedure. In 6 (15%) patients, postoperative complications occurred, including 2 grade II and 1 grades I, III, IV, and V, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Median hospital stay was 3 (1-15) days. At a median follow-up of 11 months, radiological imaging was performed on indication in 12 (30%) patients, and 1 recurrence was found. Overall QoL scores were satisfactory, and there was no difference related to the time elapsed since surgery.
CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic HH repair followed by Toupet fundoplication demonstrated a very low short-term recurrence rate. Postoperative morbidity was minimal, and a satisfactory QoL was achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27078499     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  5 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of giant paraesophageal hernia: pro laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  B Dallemagne; G Quero; A Lapergola; L Guerriero; C Fiorillo; S Perretta
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Safety of robotic assisted laparoscopic recurrent paraesophageal hernia repair: insights from a large single institution experience.

Authors:  Kendell J Sowards; Nicholas F Holton; Ekatarina G Elliott; John Hall; Kulvinder S Bajwa; Brad E Snyder; Todd D Wilson; Sheilendra S Mehta; Peter A Walker; Kavita D Chandwani; Connie L Klein; Angielyn R Rivera; Erik B Wilson; Shinil K Shah; Melissa M Felinski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Morbidity and mortality in complex robot-assisted hiatal hernia surgery: 7-year experience in a high-volume center.

Authors:  Alexander C Mertens; Rob C Tolboom; Hana Zavrtanik; Werner A Draaisma; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic repair of complete upside-down stomach hiatal hernia (the RATHER-study): a prospective comparative single center study.

Authors:  Alexander Wilhelm; Fabio Nocera; Fiorenzo V Angehrn; Martin Bolli; Romano Schneider; Luca Koechlin; Diana L Daume; Lana Fourie; Daniel Steinemann; Markus von Flüe; Ralph Peterli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  State-Level Examination of Clinical Outcomes and Costs for Robotic and Laparoscopic Approach to Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Sujay Kulshrestha; Haroon M Janjua; Corinne Bunn; Michael Rogers; Christopher DuCoin; Zaid M Abdelsattar; Fred A Luchette; Paul C Kuo; Marshall S Baker
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.532

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.