Literature DB >> 27078076

Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) quickly detect snakes but not spiders: Evolutionary origins of fear-relevant animals.

Nobuyuki Kawai1, Hiroki Koda2.   

Abstract

Humans quickly detect the presence of evolutionary threats through visual perception. Many theorists have considered humans to be predisposed to respond to both snakes and spiders as evolutionarily fear-relevant stimuli. Evidence supports that human adults, children, and snake-naive monkeys all detect pictures of snakes among pictures of flowers more quickly than vice versa, but recent neurophysiological and behavioral studies suggest that spiders may, in fact, be processed similarly to nonthreat animals. The evidence of quick detection and rapid fear learning by primates is limited to snakes, and no such evidence exists for spiders, suggesting qualitative differences between fear of snakes and fear of spiders. Here, we show that snake-naive Japanese monkeys detect a single snake picture among 8 nonthreat animal pictures (koala) more quickly than vice versa; however, no such difference in detection was observed between spiders and pleasant animals. These robust differences between snakes and spiders are the most convincing evidence that the primate visual system is predisposed to pay attention to snakes but not spiders. These findings suggest that attentional bias toward snakes has an evolutionary basis but that bias toward spiders is more due to top-down, conceptually driven effects of emotion on attention capture. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27078076     DOI: 10.1037/com0000032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  14 in total

1.  Food or threat? Wild capuchin monkeys (Sapajus libidinosus) as both predators and prey of snakes.

Authors:  Tiago Falótico; Michele P Verderane; Olívia Mendonça-Furtado; Noemi Spagnoletti; Eduardo B Ottoni; Elisabetta Visalberghi; Patrícia Izar
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Scales drive detection, attention, and memory of snakes in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus).

Authors:  Lynne A Isbell; Stephanie F Etting
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  Breaking Snake Camouflage: Humans Detect Snakes More Accurately than Other Animals under Less Discernible Visual Conditions.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kawai; Hongshen He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Defensive Vocalizations and Motor Asymmetry Triggered by Disinhibition of the Periaqueductal Gray in Non-human Primates.

Authors:  Patrick A Forcelli; Hannah F Waguespack; Ludise Malkova
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 5.  Fast Detector/First Responder: Interactions between the Superior Colliculus-Pulvinar Pathway and Stimuli Relevant to Primates.

Authors:  Sandra C Soares; Rafael S Maior; Lynne A Isbell; Carlos Tomaz; Hisao Nishijo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Preferential attentional engagement drives attentional bias to snakes in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Nobuo Masataka; Hiroki Koda; Takeshi Atsumi; Madoka Satoh; Ottmar V Lipp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Human Attitude toward Reptiles: A Relationship between Fear, Disgust, and Aesthetic Preferences.

Authors:  Markéta Janovcová; Silvie Rádlová; Jakub Polák; Kristýna Sedláčková; Šárka Peléšková; Barbora Žampachová; Daniel Frynta; Eva Landová
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Snakes elicit specific neural responses in the human infant brain.

Authors:  J Bertels; M Bourguignon; A de Heering; F Chetail; X De Tiège; A Cleeremans; A Destrebecqz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Subcortical Facilitation of Behavioral Responses to Threat.

Authors:  Mark D Vida; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Affect-Driven Attention Biases as Animal Welfare Indicators: Review and Methods.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Gareth Arnott; Emily J Bethell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.