Literature DB >> 27078025

Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes Associated with Litter Size in Berkshire Pig Placenta.

Seul Gi Kwon1, Jung Hye Hwang1, Da Hye Park1, Tae Wan Kim1, Deok Gyeong Kang1, Kyung Hee Kang1, Il-Suk Kim2, Hwa Chun Park3, Chong-Sam Na4, Jeongim Ha1, Chul Wook Kim1.   

Abstract

Improvement in litter size has become of great interest in the pig industry because fecundity is directly related to sow reproductive life. Improved reproduction has thus been achieved by elucidating the molecular functions of genes associated with fecundity. In the present study, we identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) via transcriptomic analysis using RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) in Berkshire pig placentas from larger (LLG, mean litter size >12) and smaller (SLG, mean litter size < 6.5) litter size groups. In total 588 DEGs were identified (p < 0.05, > 1.5-fold change), of which 98 were upregulated, while 490 were downregulated in the LLG compared with the SLG. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment was also performed. We concluded that 129 of the 588 DEGs were closely related to litter size according to reproduction related genes selected based on previous reports, as 110 genes were downregulated and 19 upregulated in the LLG compared with the SLG. RT-qPCR utilizing specific primers targeting the early growth response 2 (EGR2), pheromaxein c subunit (PHEROC) and endothelial lipase (LIPG) genes showed high accordance with RNA-Seq results. Furthermore, we investigated the upstream regulators of these three genes in the placenta. We found that WNT9B, a Wnt signaling pathway molecule, and IL-6, known inducers of EGR2 and LIPG, respectively, were significantly increased in LLG compared with SLG. We believe that the induction of IL-6 and LIPG may play an important role in increasing nutrition supply through the placenta from the sow to the piglet during gestation. These results provide novel molecular insights into pig reproduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27078025      PMCID: PMC4831801          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Improved litter size is a principal interest in the pig industry and among breeders. Litter size is a complex trait composed of many subordinated traits, such as ovulation rate, embryonic/fetal survival, uterine capacity, and others. Moreover, since selection by litter size has its limitations, including low heritability and sex-restriction, various efforts have been made to identify factors influencing litter size. These efforts have included optimizing nutrition and husbandry, management of sows, and genetic factors [1]. Genetic selection for increased litter size has in turn increased the prolificacy of sows and has drastically improved over the past 10 years, resulting in an average increase of 1.8 piglets per litter [2]. The first successful evidence of a candidate gene associated with litter size was estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1), which was identified using restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis [3]. Retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4), erythropoietin receptor (EPOR), amphiregulin (AREG), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and others have also been determined to be associated with litter size [1, 4–6]. In addition, several expression studies performed in pigs have developed a profile of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and even microRNAs (miRNAs) in endometria, ovaries and placentas [7-9]. The mRNA of the oligoadenylate synthetase 1 (OAS1) gene was highly expressed, whereas that of the RBP4, thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (TST) and vitronectin (VTN) genes were lowly expressed in the ovaries of a high prolificacy group compared with a low prolificacy group [7]. Moreover, the investigation uncovered the location of candidate genes according to significant quantitative trait loci (QTL) previously reported by Noguera et al. [7, 10]. The porcine endometrial transcriptome was also analyzed during the implantation period [8]. The androgen receptor (AR) was revealed to have a close interaction with genes associated with important processes during early pregnancy [8]. Recent reports on differential expression of miRNAs determined that selected miRNAs affect cell growth, angiogenesis and trophoblast differentiation, and these impacts may be important for placental growth and function [9]. Moreover, fetal loss in the pig is mostly a result of decreased uterine capacity and placental efficiency [11, 12]. Therefore, to understand the molecular mechanisms by which the structure and function of the placenta may be regulated is essential to increasing litter size [11]. Historically, the Chinese Meishan pig breed is known for its prolificacy and large litter size [13]. Some evidence also suggests that the Chinese Meishan may have improved uterine capacity and placental efficiency [14]. However, the reproductive rate of Berkshire pigs is lower than that of other pig breeds, although the production of Berkshire pigs has been increasing recently [15]. Improvement in the litter size of Berkshire pigs is essential for Berkshire pig breeders. In this context, we hypothesized that DEGs in the placenta play a critical role in the determination of litter size. However, the placental transcriptome of Berkshire pigs has not yet been elucidated. Therefore, this study analyzed the RNA-Seq of Berkshire placentas, which revealed novel genes that may be involved in placental development and function, thus playing a role in determining litter size. These results provide molecular insights into the genes underlying pig fecundity.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

There is an exception to the application of the Enforcement Rule of the Korean Animal Protection Act from Article 23 in the case of experiments conducted for scientific purposes concerning the relevant animal, ecology, and habitude of species. We did not need to obtain approval from the Animal Care and Use Committee of Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology (ACUC of GNTECH) because all of the placentas used in this study were a natural by-product. Moreover, no ethics committee approval for the study was required for livestock in the Republic of Korea. We have enclosed the ACUC of GNTECH waiver (Supplementary information). The pigs used in this study were raised according to the guidelines on animal care and use established by ACUC of GNTECH and with the Korean Animal Protection Act and related laws.

Placenta collection

Berkshire placentas were collected by a trained veterinarian from sows reared in the same environment (Dasan Pig Breeding Company, South Korea). We divided the placentas into two groups according to litter size: the larger (LLG) and smaller (SLG) litter size groups. The LLG was defined by an estimated breeding value (EBV) ≥ 0.8 and litter size ≥ 12, whereas the SLG was selected by an EBV ≤ –0.7 and litter size ≤ 6.5. Detailed information for sows is described in Table 1. Farrowing was allowed to start naturally. After delivery, the placental tissues were collected as part of the routine care of pigs. Samples were excised from the maternal side of the placenta 2 cm from the umbilical cord insertion site and free of maternal decidua corresponding to the chorioallantoic placenta. After collection, placental tissues were rinsed with PBS and frozen rapidly in liquid nitrogen.
Table 1

Characteristics of the Berkshire pigs used in this study.

Groupsample IDmonths of agebody weighttotal parity numbersmean of litter sizeEBV
SLGSLG12317545.5-0.78
SLG22317046-0.8
SLG32518046.5-0.81
LLGLLG127180412.250.9
LLG2282004120.8
LLG3282003120.85

RNA isolation and RNA-Seq

Total RNA was isolated from three Berkshire pig placentas in each group using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA). We pooled the isolated RNA from the three different pigs in a ratio of 1:1:1 before library preparation. The quality of the resulting total RNA was measured using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). All extractions exhibited an RNA integrity number > 7.0 and a 28S:18S ratio > 1.0. RNA-Seq libraries were prepared using a TruSeq RNA Sample Prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The poly A-containing mRNA molecules were purified from 2 μg total RNA from each sample using poly-T oligo-attached magnetic beads. The mRNA was fragmented into approximately 200 base pair pieces. Using reverse transcriptase and random hexamer primers, the first-strand cDNA was synthesized from the mRNA fragments. Second-strand cDNA was then synthesized using DNA polymerase I and RNaseH. The end of the cDNA fragment was then subjected to an end repair process that included the addition of a single ‘A’ base, followed by ligation of the adapters. Products were purified and enriched by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify the library DNA. Libraries were quantified using a KAPA Library Quantification kit (KAPA Biosystems, South Africa) and an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. After quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) validation, libraries were subjected to paired-end sequencing with 100-base pair read lengths using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina).

RNA-Seq analysis

High-quality reads were obtained by removing adaptor sequences, reads in which the percentage of unknown bases was greater than 10% or low quality reads (more than 20% of STAR (version 2.3.0e) [16], and the gene description in the Ensembl gene database (version 72) [17] was used to increase the accuracy of quantification. Expression levels were quantified using htseq-count (ver. 0.5.4p3) [18], while considering intersection-nonempty rules and paired-end alignments. DEGs were analyzed using TCC [19] with the negative binomial (NB) statistical test available in two R packages iDEGES/edgeR and cutoff values of p < 0.05 and 1.5-fold change.

Pearson correlation and functional enrichment analysis

A Pearson correlation coefficient was computed for fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM) and log2 (FPKM) values for genes from each group. Gene ontology (GO) [17] annotation and KEGG pathway analysis were performed on all DEGs using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery tool (DAVID; National Institute of Health; http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) Bioinformatics Resources 6.7. Statistics were applied for the selection of GO categories using a modified Fisher’s exact p-value < 0.01 (EASE score in DAVID).

RT-qPCR

Total RNA was isolated from three different placentas and was used for RT-qPCR. RNA (1 μg) was then used for reverse transcription in a 20-μL reaction volume using Superscript II (Invitrogen). RT-qPCR was performed using a Rotor Gene Q Thermocycler (QIAGEN) with SYBR green. Gene-specific exon spanning primers were designed using the Primer3 program as described previously (S1 Table) [20]. RT-qPCR was performed in a 10-μL reaction volume containing 1 μL cDNA (50 ng) as the template, 5 μL Rotor Gene SYBR Green PCR Master Mix, 1 μL each of the forward and reverse primers (10 pmol), and 3 μL H2O using the following cycling parameters: 40 cycles at 94°C for 5 s and 60°C for 10 s. A melting curve was performed at the end of the PCR for 5 s from 60°C to 95°C to identify unique PCR products amplified during the reaction. A no template control was used as a negative control. The qPCR reaction was repeated three times independently. PPIA was used as a reference gene [21]. Amplification efficiencies and correlation coefficients (R2 values) were generated using the slopes of standard curves obtained from serial dilutions. Standard curves with a 10-fold dilution series were used to calculate the amplification efficiency. The amplification efficiency was calculated according to the formula: efficiency (%) = (10(-1/slope)-1) × 100. The efficiency of all of the RT-qPCR amplifications was almost 90%. Data were analyzed by the relative quantification method using 2-ΔΔCt. The control sample used to determine fold induction was the lowest expressed sample for the target gene. The significance of differences was analyzed using Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney test with p < 0.05 considered significant.

Results

In this study, DEGs were identified from Berkshire pig placentae, and the role of candidate genes influencing litter size was investigated. To identify DEGs, we divided the placentae into two groups (LLG and SLG) according to litter size. RNA-Seq was performed on total RNA pooled from three placentae of Berkshire pigs. The total numbers of clean reads were 47,289,182 (90.8%) and 45,580,292 (95.3%) and mapped reads were 40,421,582 (85.5%) and 39,219,270 (86.0%) in LLG and SLG, respectively (data not shown). The number of genes expressed was quantified using htseq-count and was 14,824 in the LLG and 14,511 in the SLG. The number of genes commonly expressed between the two groups was 13,970 (Fig 1).
Fig 1

Identification of DEGs by RNA-Seq analysis.

The number of annotated genes using RNA-seq is shown. A total of 14,511 genes in the LLG and 14,824 genes in the SLG were detected. The number of commonly expressed genes among both groups was 13,970.

Identification of DEGs by RNA-Seq analysis.

The number of annotated genes using RNA-seq is shown. A total of 14,511 genes in the LLG and 14,824 genes in the SLG were detected. The number of commonly expressed genes among both groups was 13,970.

Analysis of annotated genes

Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for each group. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the FPKM of genes from each group was 0.962. Similarly, the Pearson correlation coefficient between the log2(FPKM) of genes was 0.978. These results indicate a strong correlation between the two groups.

Analysis of DEG and GO enrichment analysis

Each gene annotated as a DEG is shown as a dot graph in Fig 2A. The number of downregulated DEGs was higher than the number of upregulated DEGs in the LLG compared with the SLG. The significantly altered DEGs are indicated as red dots. A total of 490 and 98 genes were annotated among the downregulated DEGs and upregulated DEGs in the LLG, respectively (Fig 2B). Next, GO enrichment analysis was performed on the upregulated genes in the LLG. The annotated genes were associated with chemotaxis, extracellular region, chemical homeostasis, response to protein stimulus and coagulation. Eleven genes were associated with the extracellular region, including PLAT, INHBA, CCL2 and IL8. Six genes were associated with chemical homeostasis, including ALAS2, CCL2 and EGR2. Five genes were associated with chemotaxis, including PLAU and PLAUR (Fig 3A). We next compared GO enrichment analysis results with the downregulated genes in the LLG. The genes were categorized into extracellular region, collagen, structural constituent of cytoskeleton, cell adhesion, carbohydrate binding, symporter activity, lipid transport, oxidoreductase activity and response to hormone stimulus. Eighty-one genes were associated with the extracellular region, including LTBP2 and FAM3D. In addition, 39 genes were associated with cell adhesion, while 24 genes were related to carbohydrate binding (Fig 3B).
Fig 2

Distribution of DEGs.

(A) The dot graph shows each DEG between the LLG and SLG. log2-fold change between fragments per kilobase of exon per million reads mapped (FPKM) in the SLG and LLG according to the Cufflinks package are presented along the x axis. Red dots represent significantly altered DEGs between the LLG and SLG (p < 0.05, fold change > 1.5, the decimal system). The y axis indicates significance as -log (p value). (B) The number of downregulated and upregulated DEGs in the LLG compared with the SLG.

Fig 3

GO enrichment analysis.

GO enrichment analysis was performed for the upregulated (A) and downregulated (B) DEGs. The x axis indicates the significance of DEGs as −log (p value). The number of genes in each category is shown on the y axis, as indicated in parentheses.

Distribution of DEGs.

(A) The dot graph shows each DEG between the LLG and SLG. log2-fold change between fragments per kilobase of exon per million reads mapped (FPKM) in the SLG and LLG according to the Cufflinks package are presented along the x axis. Red dots represent significantly altered DEGs between the LLG and SLG (p < 0.05, fold change > 1.5, the decimal system). The y axis indicates significance as -log (p value). (B) The number of downregulated and upregulated DEGs in the LLG compared with the SLG.

GO enrichment analysis.

GO enrichment analysis was performed for the upregulated (A) and downregulated (B) DEGs. The x axis indicates the significance of DEGs as −log (p value). The number of genes in each category is shown on the y axis, as indicated in parentheses.

Analysis of DEGs associated with litter size

Next, we investigated the genes associated with litter size among all DEGs by searching for terms related to litter size such as reproduction, fecundity, prolificacy and litter size in the NCBI PubMed. A total of 129 (22%) of the 588 DEGs were selected. The upregulated DEGs included 19 genes; whereas, the downregulated DEGs included 110 genes (S2 and S3 Tables). The representative genes are listed in Table 2. Among the upregulated DEGs, PHEROC and XIRPL levels showed approximately 5.3- to 5.6-fold change in the LLG compared with the SLG, with the decimal system (Table 2). Interestingly, KRT1 was decreased more than 1,200-fold in the LLG compared with the SLG (S3 Table). Of note, some genes described as downregulated DEGs, such as USH1C, LCN15, DAO, MUC13A, REG4, EPS8L3, KRT77, SLC6A19, APO8, HNF4A, LGALS2, IGSF23, RBP2 and TM4SF20, were determined to lack transcripts in the LLG. Presumably, these genes might play a negative role in reproduction regulation.
Table 2

List of DEGs between LLG and SLG.

AccessionSymbolDescriptionlog2fcp-value
ENSSSCG00000013067PHEROCpheromaxein C subunit2.510.01
ENSSSCG00000011265XIRP1xin actin-binding repeat containing 12.420.01
ENSSSCG00000011951NFKBIZnuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide1.85< .001
ENSSSCG00000010224EGR2early growth response 21.62< .001
ENSSSCG00000003451PDPNPodoplanin1.55< .001
ENSSSCG00000004509LIPGendothelial lipase1.51< .001
ENSSSCG00000011663RBP2retinol binding protein 2, cellularOnly SLG< .001
ENSSSCG00000009558F10coagulation factor X protein-5.16< .001
ENSSSCG00000011453ITIH4inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H4-4.99< .001
ENSSSCG00000020694DSG1desmoglein 1-4.36< .001
ENSSSCG00000016196VIL1Villin-1-4.18< .001
ENSSSCG00000023949PIM3pim-3 oncogene-3.50< .001
ENSSSCG00000007507PCK1phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1-3.47< .001

Note: log2fc means the log2 value of the fold change in fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM) by comparing of LLG with SLG.

Note: log2fc means the log2 value of the fold change in fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM) by comparing of LLG with SLG.

Validation of DEGs associated with litter size by RT-qPCR

Next, RT-qPCR was performed to confirm the RNA-Seq results. The results from RT-qPCR were highly accordant with those from RNA-Seq. PCR products amplified using primers specific to early growth response 2 (EGR2), pheromaxein c subunit (PHEROC) and endothelial lipase (LIPG) are shown in Fig 4. In all cases, the relative fold changes in gene expression were in the same direction as those observed in the RNA-Seq results, and consistently showed a higher magnitude with RT-qPCR than RNA-Seq technology (Fig 4).
Fig 4

RT-qPCR analysis of EGR2, PHEROC and LIPG in placental tissue.

Three different placentas from LLG and SLG were prepared immediately following delivery and subjected to RT-qPCR analysis. The fold change of validation (upper panel) and RNA-Seq (lower panel) for the (A) EGR2, (B) PHEROC and (C) LIPG genes are presented. The RT-qPCR data were analyzed by relative quantification using 2-ΔΔCt. Data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (S.D.). Each experiment was performed in triplicate. *, p < 0.05 versus SLG.

RT-qPCR analysis of EGR2, PHEROC and LIPG in placental tissue.

Three different placentas from LLG and SLG were prepared immediately following delivery and subjected to RT-qPCR analysis. The fold change of validation (upper panel) and RNA-Seq (lower panel) for the (A) EGR2, (B) PHEROC and (C) LIPG genes are presented. The RT-qPCR data were analyzed by relative quantification using 2-ΔΔCt. Data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (S.D.). Each experiment was performed in triplicate. *, p < 0.05 versus SLG. To examine the molecules upstream from the DEGs annotated in this study, we investigated the mRNA expression of genes related to the Wnt signaling pathway such as TCF12, CTNNB1, WNT11 and WNT9B, because Wnt signaling plays a crucial role in placenta and trophoblast development and differentiation [22]. In addition, several Wnt ligands are strongly expressed in first trimester trophoblasts, suggesting that these ligands could play a crucial role in early placental function and development [23]. Moreover, some evidence of EGR2 induction via the Wnt signaling pathway has been obtained in investigations in other fields [24-26]. When we examined gene expression in three different placental RNA samples from LLG and SLG using RT-qPCR, the mRNA levels of TCF12 and CTNNB1 were unchanged between the two groups (Fig 5A and 5B). In comparison, the expression of WNT11 mRNA was decreased and that of WNT9B was increased in LLG compared with SLG, respectively (Fig 5C and 5D).
Fig 5

RT-qPCR analysis to assess TCF12, CTNNB1, WNT11, WNT9B and IL-6 mRNA expression.

RNAs from three different individual placentas each were prepared from LLG and SLG. RT-qPCR was performed using gene-specific primers. PPIA was used as a universal control. The RT-qPCR data were analyzed by relative quantification using 2-ΔΔCt. Data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (S.D.). Each experiment was performed in triplicate. *, p < 0.05 versus SLG.

RT-qPCR analysis to assess TCF12, CTNNB1, WNT11, WNT9B and IL-6 mRNA expression.

RNAs from three different individual placentas each were prepared from LLG and SLG. RT-qPCR was performed using gene-specific primers. PPIA was used as a universal control. The RT-qPCR data were analyzed by relative quantification using 2-ΔΔCt. Data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (S.D.). Each experiment was performed in triplicate. *, p < 0.05 versus SLG. Nutrient supply is a crucial factor supporting piglet growth. The primary fetal nutrients that cross the placenta are glucose, free amino acids, ketone bodies, and free fatty acids [27]. The triglyceride lipase gene (TLG) family comprises secreted lipases that hydrolyze triglycerides and phospholipids [28]. LIPG is one of the most well studied lipases in the TLG family [28]. Of note, LIPG is expressed in trophoblasts in the first trimester in humans. The expression of LIPG mRNA was significantly lower in placentas from intrauterine growth restricted pregnancies compared with normal placentas [28]. In this regard, the upregulation of LIPG may accelerate nutrient supply via the placenta, strongly suggesting that LIPG contributes to increased litter size. A limited number of cytokines and hormones, such as TNF-α, IL-6, leptin, and adiponectin, have been determined to regulate LIPG mRNA expression [28-30]. The mRNA expression of TNF-α, leptin and adiponectin were unchanged between the LLG and SLG (data not shown). However, IL-6 was significantly increased in the LLG compared with the SLG (Fig 5E). Moreover, one of the pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL-1B was also upregulated in LLG compared with SLG (data not shown). IL-6, together with IL-1β might enhance the capacity of endothelial cells to bind and transport high-density lipoproteins, and could increase the permeability of the endothelial barrier to allow easy transport of nutrients across the placenta [31].

Discussion

Various research groups have investigated DEGs from reproductive tissues such as the endometrium in pigs [32, 33]. DEGs in the placenta have rarely been demonstrated using RNA-Seq. In this study, we revealed DEGs according to litter size in Berkshire pig placentas. We found 588 annotated DEGs between LLG and SLG. A total of 129 genes (19 upregulated genes and 110 downregulated genes in LLG compared with SLG) from the 588 DEGs were selected because they are associated with litter size [34-37]. Intriguingly, in an effort to delineate the molecular pathways responsible for the upregulation of EGR2 and LIPG, we discovered that the induction of WNT9B and IL-6 might stimulate the upregulation of EGR2 and LIPG, respectively, in LLG compared with SLG. Previously, Wnt signaling is known to increase EGR2 expression [23-25]. Moreover, the activation of Wnt signaling accelerates EGR2 expression and compromises the inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids on EGR2 expression [25]. Therefore, we evaluated the mRNA expression of the following Wnt ligands: WNT6, WNT7B WNT9B, WNT10A, and WNT11. WNT9B was upregulated in the LLG compared with the SLG, while no expression of WNT6, WNT7B or WNT10A mRNA was detected, and WNT11 was decreased in the LLG compared with the SLG. Although we could not exclude a role of WNT11 in SLG, WNT9B is a likely mediator of EGR2 induction in LLG. As we mentioned above, Wnt signaling plays a critical role in development and differentiation of the placenta and trophoblast. Wnt may also modulate other trophoblast processes such as phospholipid uptake and transport. However, further investigation is needed to fully understand the role of Wnt signaling in the placenta. Since the pig industry is actively incorporating marker-associated selection to improve economical traits such as litter size, we searched for SNPs of the DEGs in this study. Four different missense SNPs were identified in the EGR2 gene. A future study should examine the correlation of polymorphisms in EGR2 and litter size, although we are not convinced whether the polymorphisms affect the mRNA expression or not. Together with the RNA-Seq experiment, we originally performed whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) to analyze the correlation between DNA methylation and mRNA expression. DNA methylation is a process that adds methyl groups to DNA, which stably alters the expression of genes. Some methylation is heritable. Therefore, we believe that DNA markers in which the nucleotide sequence is not changed, but influences gene expression could be useful when breeders select breeding pigs. We also wanted to determine whether the differentially methylated region (DMR) within specific genes of interest could regulate their mRNA expression. For example, PCK1 was hypomethylated in gene body region (decrease methylated status) in LLG compared with SLG, and the expression of PCK1 mRNA was down-regulated in LLG compared with SLG, which indicates a correlation between DNA methylation and mRNA expression (in press). In conclusion, we identified DEGs associated with litter size from Berkshire pig placentas that may play crucial roles in pig prolificacy. The results of this study can provide important molecular insights into regulation of litter size. More detailed investigations will be necessary in the future, including SNP analysis of candidate genes, for selection of high prolificacy pigs in order to apply this knowledge to the pig industry.

Primer sequences for RT-qPCR used in the study.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

List of up-regulated DEGs related to fecundity in LLG compared with SLG.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

List of down-regulated DEGs related to fecundity in LLG compared with SLG.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  37 in total

1.  Differences in placental structure during gestation associated with large and small pig fetuses.

Authors:  J L Vallet; B A Freking
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Regulation of dorsal fate in the neuraxis by Wnt-1 and Wnt-3a.

Authors:  J P Saint-Jeannet; X He; H E Varmus; I B Dawid
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Influence of some sow characteristics on within-litter variation of piglet birth weight.

Authors:  H Quesnel; L Brossard; A Valancogne; N Quiniou
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner.

Authors:  Alexander Dobin; Carrie A Davis; Felix Schlesinger; Jorg Drenkow; Chris Zaleski; Sonali Jha; Philippe Batut; Mark Chaisson; Thomas R Gingeras
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Selection of appropriate reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis in Berkshire, Duroc, Landrace, and Yorkshire pigs.

Authors:  Sang-Je Park; Seul Gi Kwon; Jung Hye Hwang; Da Hye Park; Tae Wan Kim; Chul Wook Kim
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  Dysregulation of placental endothelial lipase and lipoprotein lipase in intrauterine growth-restricted pregnancies.

Authors:  M Gauster; U Hiden; A Blaschitz; S Frank; U Lang; G Alvino; I Cetin; G Desoye; C Wadsack
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Loading-related regulation of transcription factor EGR2/Krox-20 in bone cells is ERK1/2 protein-mediated and prostaglandin, Wnt signaling pathway-, and insulin-like growth factor-I axis-dependent.

Authors:  Gul Zaman; Andrew Sunters; Gabriel L Galea; Behzad Javaheri; Leanne K Saxon; Alaa Moustafa; Victoria J Armstrong; Joanna S Price; Lance E Lanyon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Ensembl 2014.

Authors:  Paul Flicek; M Ridwan Amode; Daniel Barrell; Kathryn Beal; Konstantinos Billis; Simon Brent; Denise Carvalho-Silva; Peter Clapham; Guy Coates; Stephen Fitzgerald; Laurent Gil; Carlos García Girón; Leo Gordon; Thibaut Hourlier; Sarah Hunt; Nathan Johnson; Thomas Juettemann; Andreas K Kähäri; Stephen Keenan; Eugene Kulesha; Fergal J Martin; Thomas Maurel; William M McLaren; Daniel N Murphy; Rishi Nag; Bert Overduin; Miguel Pignatelli; Bethan Pritchard; Emily Pritchard; Harpreet S Riat; Magali Ruffier; Daniel Sheppard; Kieron Taylor; Anja Thormann; Stephen J Trevanion; Alessandro Vullo; Steven P Wilder; Mark Wilson; Amonida Zadissa; Bronwen L Aken; Ewan Birney; Fiona Cunningham; Jennifer Harrow; Javier Herrero; Tim J P Hubbard; Rhoda Kinsella; Matthieu Muffato; Anne Parker; Giulietta Spudich; Andy Yates; Daniel R Zerbino; Stephen M J Searle
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Secreted phosphoprotein 1 expression in endometrium and placental tissues of hyperprolific large white and meishan gilts.

Authors:  Silvia C Hernandez; Charis O Hogg; Yvon Billon; Marie-Pierre Sanchez; Jean-Pierre Bidanel; Christopher S Haley; Alan L Archibald; Cheryl J Ashworth
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.285

View more
  14 in total

1.  Serial gene co-expression network approach to mine biological meanings from integrated transcriptomes of the porcine endometrium during estrous cycle.

Authors:  Krishnamoorthy Srikanth; WonCheoul Park; Dajeong Lim; Kyung Tai Lee; Gul Won Jang; Bong Hwan Choi; Hakhyun Ka; Jong-Eun Park; Jun-Mo Kim
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.410

2.  Factors contributing to the variation in placental efficiency on days 70, 90, and 110 of gestation in gilts.

Authors:  Shanice K Krombeen; William C Bridges; Matthew E Wilson; Tiffany A Wilmoth
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Analysis of differential gene expression of the transgenic pig with overexpression of PGC1α in muscle.

Authors:  Hao Gu; Jianan Li; Fei Ying; Bo Zuo; Zaiyan Xu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Transcriptomic Analysis of Oenococcus oeni SD-2a Response to Acid Shock by RNA-Seq.

Authors:  Longxiang Liu; Hongyu Zhao; Shuai Peng; Tao Wang; Jing Su; Yanying Liang; Hua Li; Hua Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Genome-wide differential mRNA expression profiles in follicles of two breeds and at two stages of estrus cycle of gilts.

Authors:  Qingpo Chu; Bo Zhou; Feilong Xu; Ruonan Chen; Chunyan Shen; Tingting Liang; Yuan Li; Allan P Schinckel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes in Porcine Ovaries at Proestrus and Estrus Stages Using RNA-Seq Technique.

Authors:  Songbai Yang; Xiaolong Zhou; Yue Pei; Han Wang; Ke He; Ayong Zhao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  N6-methyladenosine modification of circNSUN2 facilitates cytoplasmic export and stabilizes HMGA2 to promote colorectal liver metastasis.

Authors:  Ri-Xin Chen; Xin Chen; Liang-Ping Xia; Jia-Xing Zhang; Zhi-Zhong Pan; Xiao-Dan Ma; Kai Han; Jie-Wei Chen; Jean-Gabrie Judde; Olivier Deas; Feng Wang; Ning-Fang Ma; Xinyuan Guan; Jing-Ping Yun; Feng-Wei Wang; Rui-Hua Xu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Predicting prognosis of endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma on the basis of gene expression and clinical features using Random Forest.

Authors:  Fufen Yin; Xingyang Shao; Lijun Zhao; Xiaoping Li; Jingyi Zhou; Yuan Cheng; Xiangjun He; Shu Lei; Jiangeng Li; Jianliu Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Genetic Association between Swine Leukocyte Antigen Class II Haplotypes and Reproduction Traits in Microminipigs.

Authors:  Asako Ando; Noriaki Imaeda; Tatsuya Matsubara; Masaki Takasu; Asuka Miyamoto; Shino Oshima; Naohito Nishii; Yoshie Kametani; Takashi Shiina; Jerzy K Kulski; Hitoshi Kitagawa
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  DNA methylation patterns and gene expression associated with litter size in Berkshire pig placenta.

Authors:  Jung Hye Hwang; Sang Mi An; Seulgi Kwon; Da Hye Park; Tae Wan Kim; Deok Gyeong Kang; Go Eun Yu; Il-Suk Kim; Hwa Chun Park; Jeongim Ha; Chul Wook Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.