Literature DB >> 27077569

Psychological defense mechanisms among individuals with SCI with adjustment disorder.

Manijeh Yazdanshenas Ghazwin1, Seyed Amir Hossein Tavakoli2, Sahar Latifi1, Hooshang Saberi3, Nazi Derakhshanrad1, Mir Saeed Yekaninejad4, Majid Sadeghi5, Seyed-Hassan Emami Razavi1, Abbas Norouzi Javidan1, Seyed-Mohammad Ghodsi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The used psychological defense styles among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) with adjustment disorders (AJD) have not yet been described. In the present investigation, the prevalence of AJD among people with SCI has been estimated and the pattern of used defense styles has been identified.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional investigation.
SETTING: A tertiary rehabilitation center in Iran. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals referred to Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center were invited to participate in a screening interview. AJD was diagnosed based on DSM-V criteria. Those with AJD diagnosis were scheduled for another interview to assess defense mechanisms. OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic and injury-related variables were recorded. Defense mechanisms were assessed by the 40-item version of the Defense-Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40).
RESULTS: Among 114 participants, 32 (28%) were diagnosed with AJD among whom 23 subjects attended the second interview. Mean age and time since injury were 29.57 ± 9.29 years and 11.70 ± 6.34 months, respectively. The majority of patients were using idealization defense mechanism (91.3%). In the second and third place, passive aggression (87.0%) and somatization (82.6%) defense mechanisms were observed, respectively. Neurotic style was dominantly used (11.52 ± 2.26). Sex, marital status, educational level, cause of the injury and injury level were not related to defense style (P: 0.38, 0.69, 0.88, 0.73, and P: 0.32, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Prevalence of AJD is estimated to be 28% among individuals with SCI. The most prevalent defense style was neurotic and the dominant used defense mechanism was "idealization." The role of demographic and injury-related variables in determining the used defense mechanisms was insignificant.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjustment disorders; Defense mechanisms; Spinal cord injury

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27077569      PMCID: PMC5815149          DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2016.1140389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med        ISSN: 1079-0268            Impact factor:   1.985


  45 in total

1.  [Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40) for defense mechanisms measure: a preliminary study].

Authors:  Carolina Blaya; Letícia Kipper; Elizeth Heldt; Luciano Isolan; Lúcia Helena Ceitlin; Michael Bond; Gisele Gus Manfro
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 2.697

2.  Adjustment disorders as stress response syndromes: a new diagnostic concept and its exploration in a medical sample.

Authors:  Andreas Maercker; Franziska Einsle; Volker Kollner
Journal:  Psychopathology       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 1.944

3.  The French version of the Defense Style Questionnaire.

Authors:  C Bonsack; J N Despland; J Spagnoli
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 17.659

4.  Clinical utility of the Defensive Functioning Scale in the assessment of depression.

Authors:  Jared A DeFife; Mark J Hilsenroth
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.254

5.  Diagnostic ambiguity of subthreshold depression: minor depression vs. adjustment disorder with depressive mood.

Authors:  Nori Takei; Genichi Sugihara
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.392

6.  Functional recovery measures for spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Kim Anderson; Sergio Aito; Michal Atkins; Fin Biering-Sørensen; Susan Charlifue; Armin Curt; John Ditunno; Clive Glass; Ralph Marino; Ruth Marshall; Mary Jane Mulcahey; Marcel Post; Gordana Savic; Giorgio Scivoletto; Amiram Catz
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Psychological acceptance and alexithymia in spinal cord injury patients.

Authors:  I Fukunishi; I Koyama; H Tobimatsu
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1995-04

Review 8.  The adjustment disorders: the conundrums of the diagnoses.

Authors:  James J Strain; Albert Diefenbacher
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.735

9.  The association between adjustment disorder diagnosed at psychiatric treatment facilities and completed suicide.

Authors:  Jaimie L Gradus; Ping Qin; Alisa K Lincoln; Matthew Miller; Elizabeth Lawler; Timothy L Lash
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.790

10.  Assessment of Defense Styles and Mechanisms in Iranian Patients Suffering from Obsessive Compulsive or Panic Disorders versus Normal Controls using Persian Version of Defense Style Questionnaire-40.

Authors:  Ruhollah Shabanpour; Ali Reza Zahiroddin; Masoud Janbozorgi; Padideh Ghaeli
Journal:  Iran J Psychiatry       Date:  2012
View more
  1 in total

1.  Who is the surgically resilient individual with traumatic spinal cord injury?

Authors:  David Graham; Guillermo Becerril-Martinez; Jonathan Tang
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.