Literature DB >> 27077138

Privacy in Pharmacogenetics: An End-to-End Case Study of Personalized Warfarin Dosing.

Matthew Fredrikson1, Eric Lantz1, Somesh Jha1, Simon Lin2, David Page1, Thomas Ristenpart1.   

Abstract

We initiate the study of privacy in pharmacogenetics, wherein machine learning models are used to guide medical treatments based on a patient's genotype and background. Performing an in-depth case study on privacy in personalized warfarin dosing, we show that suggested models carry privacy risks, in particular because attackers can perform what we call model inversion: an attacker, given the model and some demographic information about a patient, can predict the patient's genetic markers. As differential privacy (DP) is an oft-proposed solution for medical settings such as this, we evaluate its effectiveness for building private versions of pharmacogenetic models. We show that DP mechanisms prevent our model inversion attacks when the privacy budget is carefully selected. We go on to analyze the impact on utility by performing simulated clinical trials with DP dosing models. We find that for privacy budgets effective at preventing attacks, patients would be exposed to increased risk of stroke, bleeding events, and mortality. We conclude that current DP mechanisms do not simultaneously improve genomic privacy while retaining desirable clinical efficacy, highlighting the need for new mechanisms that should be evaluated in situ using the general methodology introduced by our work.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 27077138      PMCID: PMC4827719     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc USENIX Secur Symp


  18 in total

1.  Genotypes of the cytochrome p450 isoform, CYP2C9, and the vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 conjointly determine stable warfarin dose: a prospective study.

Authors:  John F Carlquist; Benjamin D Horne; Joseph B Muhlestein; Donald L Lappé; Bryant M Whiting; Matthew J Kolek; Jessica L Clarke; Brent C James; Jeffrey L Anderson
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  A PK-PD model for predicting the impact of age, CYP2C9, and VKORC1 genotype on individualization of warfarin therapy.

Authors:  A-K Hamberg; M-L Dahl; M Barban; M G Scordo; M Wadelius; V Pengo; R Padrini; E N Jonsson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  The disclosure of diagnosis codes can breach research participants' privacy.

Authors:  Grigorios Loukides; Joshua C Denny; Bradley Malin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  A pharmacogenetic versus a clinical algorithm for warfarin dosing.

Authors:  Stephen E Kimmel; Benjamin French; Scott E Kasner; Julie A Johnson; Jeffrey L Anderson; Brian F Gage; Yves D Rosenberg; Charles S Eby; Rosemary A Madigan; Robert B McBane; Sherif Z Abdel-Rahman; Scott M Stevens; Steven Yale; Emile R Mohler; Margaret C Fang; Vinay Shah; Richard B Horenstein; Nita A Limdi; James A S Muldowney; Jaspal Gujral; Patrice Delafontaine; Robert J Desnick; Thomas L Ortel; Henny H Billett; Robert C Pendleton; Nancy L Geller; Jonathan L Halperin; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael D Caldwell; Robert M Califf; Jonas H Ellenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  A regulatory science perspective on warfarin therapy: a pharmacogenetic opportunity.

Authors:  Myong-Jin Kim; Shiew-Mei Huang; Urs A Meyer; Atiqur Rahman; Lawrence J Lesko
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.126

6.  Comparison of 10-mg and 5-mg warfarin initiation nomograms together with low-molecular-weight heparin for outpatient treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael J Kovacs; Marc Rodger; David R Anderson; Beverly Morrow; Gertrude Kells; Judy Kovacs; Eleanor Boyle; Philip S Wells
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  A systems approach to designing effective clinical trials using simulations.

Authors:  Vincent A Fusaro; Prasad Patil; Chih-Lin Chi; Charles F Contant; Peter J Tonellato
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Cost-effectiveness of warfarin: trial versus "real-world" stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Sonja V Sorensen; Sarah Dewilde; Daniel E Singer; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Brigitta U Monz; Jonathan M Plumb
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Estimation of the warfarin dose with clinical and pharmacogenetic data.

Authors:  T E Klein; R B Altman; N Eriksson; B F Gage; S E Kimmel; M-T M Lee; N A Limdi; D Page; D M Roden; M J Wagner; M D Caldwell; J A Johnson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays.

Authors:  Nils Homer; Szabolcs Szelinger; Margot Redman; David Duggan; Waibhav Tembe; Jill Muehling; John V Pearson; Dietrich A Stephan; Stanley F Nelson; David W Craig
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  19 in total

1.  Quantification of private information leakage from phenotype-genotype data: linking attacks.

Authors:  Arif Harmanci; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 2.  Privacy-preserving techniques of genomic data-a survey.

Authors:  Md Momin Al Aziz; Md Nazmus Sadat; Dima Alhadidi; Shuang Wang; Xiaoqian Jiang; Cheryl L Brown; Noman Mohammed
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  A System-Driven Taxonomy of Attacks and Defenses in Adversarial Machine Learning.

Authors:  Koosha Sadeghi; Ayan Banerjee; Sandeep K S Gupta
Journal:  IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput Intell       Date:  2020-05-25

4.  Robust Transparency Against Model Inversion Attacks.

Authors:  Yasmeen Alufaisan; Murat Kantarcioglu; Yan Zhou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Dependable Secure Comput       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 6.791

5.  Enabling Privacy-Preserving GWASs in Heterogeneous Human Populations.

Authors:  Sean Simmons; Cenk Sahinalp; Bonnie Berger
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 10.304

6.  Privacy in the Genomic Era.

Authors:  Muhammad Naveed; Erman Ayday; Ellen W Clayton; Jacques Fellay; Carl A Gunter; Jean-Pierre Hubaux; Bradley A Malin; Xiaofeng Wang
Journal:  ACM Comput Surv       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 10.282

7.  Privacy-preserving microbiome analysis using secure computation.

Authors:  Justin Wagner; Joseph N Paulson; Xiao Wang; Bobby Bhattacharjee; Héctor Corrada Bravo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Efficient differentially private learning improves drug sensitivity prediction.

Authors:  Antti Honkela; Mrinal Das; Arttu Nieminen; Onur Dikmen; Samuel Kaski
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.540

9.  Secure and Efficient Regression Analysis Using a Hybrid Cryptographic Framework: Development and Evaluation.

Authors:  Md Nazmus Sadat; Xiaoqian Jiang; Md Momin Al Aziz; Shuang Wang; Noman Mohammed
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2018-03-05

10.  Inference attacks against differentially private query results from genomic datasets including dependent tuples.

Authors:  Nour Almadhoun; Erman Ayday; Özgür Ulusoy
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.