Literature DB >> 27077088

Data on single-step purification method for dye-labeled DNA sequencing.

Kohei Fujikura1.   

Abstract

Dye-labelled DNA sequencing is one of the most common and robust technique required for molecular biology since 1977 (Sanger, 1977) [1]. I have recently provided the single-step purification method for dye-labeled sequencing products, which is based on the removal of the washing step in EDTA/ethanol precipitation (Fujikura, 2015) [2]. Here I assess and report the accumulated data of the modified method on the larger scale in practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA sequencing; EDTA; Ethanol precipitation; Purification; Quality value

Year:  2016        PMID: 27077088      PMCID: PMC4816862          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.02.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the data The data provide the scheme and characterize the success rate for modified EDTA/ethanol purification method for dye-labeled DNA sequencing. The data provide the optimization of methods, including the amount of DNA template, primers, and buffer conditions for rapid purification of dye-labeled sequencing. The modified method provides the quick and inexpensive purification technique for DNA sequencing.

Data

Dye-labeled DNA sequencing technique is still an important tool for clinical decision making on cancer [3], [4], [5], drug metabolism genotyping [6], [7], [8], pathogen identification [9], [10], [11], inherited disease [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17] and so on [18], [19]. However, the methods remain laborious and time-consuming. Here I modified sequencing method and assessed its data quality (Fig. 1). The modified method requires only 10 min, whereas commercial purification kits and standard ethanol precipitation require a longer processing time. DNA sequences of more than 850–900 bp were more stably obtained in a single sequencing reaction with this rapid method without compromising high-quality base calling and read length (916±35 bp, n=168, QV>20). (Fig. 1). The read length obtained by this method was significantly longer than that obtained by standard methods (modified EDTA vs. standard EDTA (877±37 bp, n=168); P<0.01) (Fig. 1). The failure rate of modified method was quite low (0.6%; 1/168).
Fig. 1

(A) Method for the single-step purification of dye-labeled sequencing products is described in left half. (B) Comparison of the sequence read lengths with QV>20 in two different methods is shown in right graph. Results are shown as the means±standard deviations (Student t tests; ∗P<0.01).

Experimental design, materials and methods

Sequencing reaction

Sequencing reaction was performed in a 10 μl scale using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (dilution rate: 1:16–1:32) (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), 10 pmol of various primers, and 50–1500 ng of template DNA (50 ng for 100–300 bp PCR product, 250 ng for 300–2000 bp PCR product, or 1500 ng for plasmid) for one experimental run. The following thermal cycle was used for the amplifications: 96 °C for 1 min, followed by 40–50 cycles of 96 °C for 10 s, 50–58 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 150 s.

Modified purification technique and data analysis

1 μl of 125 mM of EDTA and 30 μl of 100% ethanol were added to each sequencing reaction, and the mixture was then lightly vortexed (Fig. 1). After centrifugation (15,000g, 5 min for tube; 4000 g, 15 min for plate), the supernatant was carefully aspirated and discarded. Next, after drying the precipitate, 40 μl of distilled water or TE0.1 buffer (10 mM Tris–acetate [pH 8.0] + 0.1 mM EDTA) was added to each reaction. ABI PRISM 3130 Genetic analyzer and POP-7 polymer were used as the separation machine and matrices, but the other Genetic analyzer (ABI Prism 310, 3730, or 3500) and polymers (POP-4 or POP-6) are also applicable. The sequence data was analyzed with ABI Prism DNA Sequencing Analysis Software v5.1. The quality value score 20 (QV20) was used as indicator of sequencing quality. Student׳s t tests were performed to evaluate the significance between two methods.
Subject areaMolecular biology
More specific subject areaDNA sequencing
Type of dataGraph
How data was acquiredDNA sequencer
Data formatAnalyzed data
Experimental factorsDye-labeled sequencing reaction is performed in specified dilution rate.
Experimental featuresThe modified EDTA/ethanol method skips the washing step in EDTA/ethanol precipitation for dye-labeled DNA sequencing.
Data source locationJapan
Data accessibilityThe data are with this article.
  18 in total

1.  Isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 is mutated in inflammatory bowel disease-associated intestinal adenocarcinoma with low-grade tubuloglandular histology but not in sporadic intestinal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Douglas J Hartman; David Binion; Miguel Regueiro; Wolfgang Schraut; Nathan Bahary; Weijing Sun; Marina Nikiforova; Reetesh K Pai
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Variation in genes controlling warfarin disposition and response in American Indian and Alaska Native people: CYP2C9, VKORC1, CYP4F2, CYP4F11, GGCX.

Authors:  Alison E Fohner; Renee Robinson; Joseph Yracheta; Denise A Dillard; Brian Schilling; Burhan Khan; Scarlett Hopkins; Bert Boyer; Jynene Black; Howard Wiener; Hemant K Tiwari; Adam Gordon; Deborah Nickerson; Jesse M Tsai; Federico M Farin; Timothy A Thornton; Allan E Rettie; Kenneth E Thummel
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  A simplified Sanger sequencing method for full genome sequencing of multiple subtypes of human influenza A viruses.

Authors:  Yi-Mo Deng; Natalie Spirason; Pina Iannello; Lauren Jelley; Hilda Lau; Ian G Barr
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.168

4.  A pharmacogenetic candidate gene study of tenofovir-associated Fanconi syndrome.

Authors:  Amber Dahlin; Matthias Wittwer; Melanie de la Cruz; Jonathan M Woo; Rujuta Bam; Valeska Scharen-Guivel; John Flaherty; Adrian S Ray; Tomas Cihlar; Samir K Gupta; Kathleen M Giacomini
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  TERT Promoter Mutations Are Predictive of Aggressive Clinical Behavior in Patients with Spitzoid Melanocytic Neoplasms.

Authors:  Seungjae Lee; Raymond L Barnhill; Reinhard Dummer; James Dalton; Jianrong Wu; Alberto Pappo; Armita Bahrami
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A Novel Mutation in a Kazakh Family with X-Linked Alport Syndrome.

Authors:  Barshagul T Baikara; Elena V Zholdybayeva; Saule E Rakhimova; Nazym B Nigmatullina; Kuvat T Momynaliev; Yerlan M Ramanculov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Multigene panel analysis identified germline mutations of DNA repair genes in breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yosuke Hirotsu; Hiroshi Nakagomi; Ikuko Sakamoto; Kenji Amemiya; Toshio Oyama; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Masao Omata
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.183

8.  An unclassified microorganism: novel pathogen candidate lurking in human airways.

Authors:  Kazumasa Fukuda; Kazuhiro Yatera; Midori Ogawa; Toshinori Kawanami; Kei Yamasaki; Shingo Noguchi; Robert S Murphy; Hiroshi Mukae; Hatsumi Taniguchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Recombination drives evolution of the Clostridium difficile 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region.

Authors:  Sandra Janezic; Alexander Indra; Thomas Rattei; Thomas Weinmaier; Maja Rupnik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Haploinsufficiency of insulin gene enhancer protein 1 (ISL1) is associated with d-transposition of the great arteries.

Authors:  Kazutoyo Osoegawa; Kathleen Schultz; Kenneth Yun; Nebil Mohammed; Gary M Shaw; Edward J Lammer
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.