Literature DB >> 27076813

Canine visceral leishmaniasis in the Northeast Region of Brazil.

Flávio Gonçalves Brito1, Helio Langoni2, Rodrigo Costa da Silva3, Tereza Emmanuelle de Farias Rotondano4, Marcia Almeida de Melo5, Giselle Souza da Paz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a zoonosis that affects dogs and other mammals, including humans. Contact with dogs is a major risk factor for humans. This disease is endemic in several regions of Brazil. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of Leishmania spp. infection in dogs and to correlate it with possible risk factors.
METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 391 dogs of different ages, breeds, and both genders, coming from Campina Grande, Paraíba state, Brazil. An epidemiological questionnaire was employed in order to identify risk factors associated with the disease. Serological tests were performed using indirect immunofluorescence, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA S7®) and polymerase chain reaction.
RESULTS: Leishmania spp. antibodies were detected in 33 (8.4 %) and 17 (4.3 %) dogs according to the indirect immunofluorescence test (IFAT) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA S7®), respectively. PCR results indicated the presence of L. chagasi DNA in only eight (2 %) blood samples. There was a significant association between reactive animals and contact with animals from different houses (OR = 4.1; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that CVL may occur in urban areas. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the association among different diagnostic tests may lead to a more accurate identification of positive animals, which might help to improve the disease control and prevent euthanasia in false-positive results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Dog; Kala-azar; Risk factors; Zoonosis

Year:  2016        PMID: 27076813      PMCID: PMC4830077          DOI: 10.1186/s40409-016-0069-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis        ISSN: 1678-9180


Background

Leishmaniasis is a worldwide zoonotic disease, transmitted by Phlebotominae sand flies of the Psychodidae family. It is more common in tropical and subtropical areas since its vectors are widely distributed among hot and moderate climate regions [1]. This disease is caused by a dimorphic protozoan belonging to the genus Leishmania. In Brazil, visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is caused by Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi and shows a wide territorial distribution among areas of different geographic, climatic and social aspects [2]. Dogs are considered important reservoirs in endemic areas [3]. The prevalence of canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) in the Brazilian Northeast region, ranging from in 16 % in Garanhuns to 40.3 % in Paulista, Pernambuco state [4, 5]. There are a few studies related to leishmaniasis prevalence in the city of Campina Grande and epidemiological surveys are the basis for the disease control programs. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the infection with L. chagasi in dogs from the urban area of Campina Grande, Paraíba State, and the interpretation of the results by the evolution of an epidemiological survey.

Methods

Blood samples were collected from 391 dogs, regardless of gender, breed and age, all from private properties from the urban area of Campina Grande. Prior to blood collection, the dog owners signed an informed consent form and answered a questionnaire in an interview conducted in order to identify possible risk factors associated with the disease. The research was approved by the Ethics Committee of Botucatu Medical School, UNESP (CEEA #897-2011). Campina Grande is located on the semiarid region of Paraíba state, 125 km (77.67 miles) away from the capital, João Pessoa, and it has an area of 599.6 km2 (372.58 miles2) and average altitude of 555 m (1,820.87 ft) above the sea level. The population size was calculated by Epi Info 3.5.1 software, with 5 % of significance level (α), 95 % of confidence interval, and 6 % of margin of error [6]. The canine population of 55,000 animals was based on the human population of 385,000 inhabitants reported in the last census of the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), in 2010 [7]. At the same time the blood was collected, a specific epidemiological questionnaire was filled out by their owners. Leishmania spp. antibodies were detected by the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT), using Leishmania major and Leishmania chagasi antigens adopting 40 as the cutoff titer [8]. ELISA S7® recombinant kit, authorized by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply (MAPA), was also employed, considering 100 UI as the cutoff titer. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using species-specific primers for Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi (LC14: 5′-CGCACGTTATATCTACAGGTTGAG-3′; LC15: 5′-TGTTTGGGATTGAGGTAATAGTGA-3′), amplifying a final product of 167 base pairs (bp) from a preserved region of Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi kDNA minicircle (FMVZ-UNESP). The PCR protocol and cycling was described by Lachaud et al. [9]. All data were tabulated in an Excel spreadsheet. The association of the results of Leishmania spp. antibodies and the epidemiological data was analyzed by chi-square (χ2) or Fischer’s exact test, adopting 5 % of significance level (α). The correlation between the antibody titers obtained by both tests was analyzed based on Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rs). Statistics related to the performance of IFAT-Lc, ELISA, and PCR were calculated by adopting IFAT-Lm as the gold standard [10]. All the analyses were performed by employing Epi Info 3.5.1 and BioEstat 5.0 software [11].

Results and discussion

Thirty-three (8.4 %) dogs resulted positive to IFAT and 17 (4.3 %) to ELISA. Although the disease maintains its rural characteristics, nowadays its urbanization can be noticed. A comparison of results obtained by IFAT with Leishmania major antigen presented better results than IFAT with Leishmania chagasi antigen with 98 % of efficiency, followed by ELISA, with 93 %. The results obtained by polymerase chain reaction showed that only eight (2 %) animals had Leishmania spp. DNA. CLV is a chronic disease and this result may be expected. The highest prevalence of reactive animals to L. major antibodies was found in the neighborhoods of Palmeira, Dinamérica and Bodocongó, located in the suburbs, presenting areas with social and economic problems. From the seropositive animals, only one dog had clinical signs consistent with the disease characterized by alopecia, splenomegaly, malnutrition, conjunctivitis, and corneal opacity. In the analysis of the studied epidemiological variables, only contact with other animals presented statistical association (p = 0.02; Table 1), demonstrating that dogs in contact with other animals are 4.1 times more likely to be seropositive to anti-L. major antibodies than animals that have no contact. When the results are stratified by diversifying the number of dogs without contact with any other animal, the prevalence was 1.7 %. In case of contact with only one animal, the prevalence was 6.3 and 15.2 % when there was contact with two or more animals (p <0.05). These results corroborate those of Amóra et al. [12] who also noted that the presence of other dogs facilitates the maintenance of infection among this species, which increases the risk of contamination to humans [13].
Table 1

Association between IFT-Lm results and epidemiological variables investigated in the studied animals

VariableNIFATa Variable (%); CI95%b OR (CI95%)c p d
GenderMale195147.2; 4.4–11.71.4 (0.6–2.9)0.24e
Female196199.7; 6.3–14.7
BreedPure11497.9; 4.2–14.31.1 (0.5–2.5)0.49e
Mongrel277248.7; 5.9–12.6
Age (years)Young (≤1 year)5447.4; 3.0–17.61.2 (0.4–3.5)0.51e
Adult (>1 year)337298.6; 6.1–12.1
Age (months)6-12 months5447.4; 3.0–17.60.78f
12-24 months8156.2; 2.7–13.7
24-48 months9277.6; 3.8–14.9
48-60 months8689.3; 4.8–17.3
>60 months78911.5; 6.2–20.5
Contact with other animalsNo7722.6; 0.8–9.04.1 (1.0–17.6)0.02e
Yes314319.9; 7.1–13.7
Number of contacted animalsNone5911.7; 0.4–8.90.00f
Only one207136.3; 3.7–10.5
Two or more1251915.2; 10.0–22.5
RaisingDomestic307237.5; 5.1–11.00.27f
Semi-domestic791012.7; 7.1–21.8
Free500.0; 0.0–0.0
FoodCommercial feed8889.1; 4.7–16.90.84f
Homemade food130129.2; 5.4–15.5
Both173137.5; 4.5–12.4
EnvironmentEarth8078.8; 4.4–17.00.91f
Cement178169.0; 5.6–14.1
Both131107.6; 4.2–13.5
DisinfectionDaily326257.7; 5.3–11.10.08f
Weekly46817.4; 9.1–30.8
Fortnightly1500.0; 0.0–0.0
Monthly300.0; 0.0–0.0

aTiter ≥40; bfrequency of positive animals based on the variables studied (confidence interval = 95 %); cOR: odds ratio; d p: p value for α = 5; eFisher’s exact test; f chi-square test

Association between IFT-Lm results and epidemiological variables investigated in the studied animals aTiter ≥40; bfrequency of positive animals based on the variables studied (confidence interval = 95 %); cOR: odds ratio; d p: p value for α = 5; eFisher’s exact test; f chi-square test There was no statistical association (p >0.05) regarding dogs living in environments with daily, weekly, biweekly or monthly cleaning. It is known that cleaning at regular intervals prevents the accumulation of organic matter, which avoids the proliferation of phlebotomines that need organic matter to complete their life cycle (Table 1). Regarding gender, females had a higher prevalence of 9.7 %, compared with males that had 7.2 %. However, there was no statistical association (p = 0.24), confirming the results of Barbosa et al. [14], who found higher prevalence in females, but without statistical association. The chances of infection are the same for both genders (Table 1). Assessing the results regarding animals’ age and breed, there is no statistical association according to Barbosa et al. [14] and Amóra et al. [12]. However, Silva et al. [15] and Dantas-Torres et al. [5] found higher prevalence in young dogs (p <0.05). There was also no statistical association concerning breed, and then the prevalence was similar in all the situations (Table 1). Statistical associations were not observed (p >0.05) in relation to the environment, the fact that the animal remained on dirt floor, cement or both; if commercial feed, homemade food or both were provided to the dog (Table 1); and regarding the education and income of the ones responsible for the animals (Table 2).
Table 2

Association between the social condition of the owners (education and income) and the detection of antibodies against Leishmania major by IFAT

VariableNIFATa Variable (%); CI95%b OR (CI95%)c P d
EducationIlliterate2015.0; 1.2–23.80.76f
Incomplete primary education62812.9; 6.7–23.5
Primary education4624.3; 1.3–14.5
Incomplete secondary education7579.3; 4.7–18.1
Complete secondary education10287.8; 4.1–14.7
Incomplete tertiary education2015.0; 1.2–23.8
Complete tertiary education6669.1; 4.3–18.5
Income<2 wages1972010.2; 6.7–15.20.56f
2–4 wages130107.7; 4.3–13.6
5–6 wages3825.3; 1.6–17.3
>6 wages2613.8; 0.9–19.0
Association between the social condition of the owners (education and income) and the detection of antibodies against Leishmania major by IFAT

Conclusion

CVL prevalence in Campina Grande has increased in the last years, showing that this disease has adapted to the urban area with an endemic profile, which shows the lack of knowledge by the population and the lack of attention regarding disease control. Animals that had contact with other animals are more likely to be serologically positive to Leishmania major antibodies.

Ethics approval

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Botucatu Medical School, UNESP, CEEA 897–2011.
  8 in total

1.  A spreadsheet for the calculation of comprehensive statistics for the assessment of diagnostic tests and inter-rater agreement.

Authors:  A Mackinnon
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  Seroepidemiological survey on canine leishmaniasis among dogs from an urban area of Brazil.

Authors:  Filipe Dantas-Torres; Maria Edileuza Felinto de Brito; Sinval Pinto Brandão-Filho
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 2.738

Review 3.  Urban parasitology: visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil.

Authors:  Michael O Harhay; Piero L Olliaro; Dorcas Lamounier Costa; Carlos Henrique Nery Costa
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2011-05-18

4.  Fluorescent antibody test for the serodiagnosis of American trypanosomiasis. Technical modification employing preserved culture forms of Trypanosoma cruzi in a slide test.

Authors:  M E Camargo
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  1966 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.846

5.  Prevalence of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis in dogs in an endemic area of Brazil.

Authors:  Danillo de Souza Pimentel; Rafael Antonio Nascimento Ramos; Marília de Andrade Santana; Carina Scanoni Maia; Gílcia Aparecida de Carvalho; Hernande Pereira da Silva; Leucio Câmara Alves
Journal:  Rev Soc Bras Med Trop       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 1.581

6.  Comparison of six PCR methods using peripheral blood for detection of canine visceral leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Laurence Lachaud; Sarah Marchergui-Hammami; Elisabeth Chabbert; Jacques Dereure; Jean Pierre Dedet; Patrick Bastien
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  [Leishmaniasis in domestic dogs: epidemiological aspects].

Authors:  Alba Valéria Machado da Silva; Adelzon Assis de Paula; Maria Alice Airosa Cabrera; João Carlos Araújo Carreira
Journal:  Cad Saude Publica       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 1.632

Review 8.  Vector and reservoir control for preventing leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Urbà González; Mariona Pinart; David Sinclair; Alireza Firooz; Claes Enk; Ivan D Vélez; Tonya M Esterhuizen; Mario Tristan; Jorge Alvar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-05
  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  High seroprevalence and peripheral spatial distribution of visceral leishmaniasis among domestic dogs in an emerging urban focus in Central Brazil: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Amanda Gabriela de Carvalho; João Gabriel Guimarães Luz; Luane Dantas Rodrigues; João Victor Leite Dias; Cor Jesus Fernandes Fontes
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Responsible companion animal guardianship is associated with canine visceral leishmaniasis: an analytical cross-sectional survey in an urban area of southeastern Brazil.

Authors:  Paulo Henrique Araújo Soares; Eduardo Sérgio da Silva; Klauber Menezes Penaforte; Renata Aparecida Nascimento Ribeiro; Marcella Oliveira Gama de Melo; Diogo Tavares Cardoso; Ingrid Morselli Santos; Raissa Cotta Machado; Clara Lemos Carneiro Trindade; Anna Karolyna Rodrigues Cunha; Rafael Gonçalves Teixeira-Neto; Saulo Nascimento de Melo; Vanessa Vilela de Aquino; Vinícius Silva Belo
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Serosurvey for canine visceral leishmaniasis in rural and urban areas of the Brazilian Legal Amazon.

Authors:  Andresa Guimarães; Juliana Macedo Raimundo; Helciléia Dias Santos; Rosangela Zacarias Machado; Cristiane Divan Baldani
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.257

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.