Literature DB >> 27076601

Blood Pressure Variability and Prediction of Target Organ Damage in Patients With Uncomplicated Hypertension.

Panagiota Veloudi1, Christopher L Blizzard1, Geoffrey A Head2, Walter P Abhayaratna3, Michael Stowasser4, James E Sharman5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The average of multiple blood pressure (BP) readings (mean BP) independently predicts target organ damage (TOD). Observational studies have also shown an independent relationship between BP variability (BPV) and TOD, but there is limited longitudinal data. This study aimed to determine the effects of changes in mean BP levels compared with BPV on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV).
METHODS: Mean BP levels (research-protocol clinic BP (clinic BP), 24-hour ambulatory BP, and 7-day home BP) and BPV were assessed in 286 patients with uncomplicated hypertension (mean age 64±8 SD years, 53% women) over 12 months. Reading-to-reading BPV (from 24-hour ambulatory BP) and day-to-day BPV (from 7-day home BP) were assessed at baseline and 12 months, and visit-to-visit BPV (clinic BP) was assessed from 5 visits over 12 months. LVMI was measured by 3D echocardiography and aPWV with applanation tonometry.
RESULTS: The strongest predictors of the changes in LVMI (ΔLVMI) were the changes in mean 24-hour systolic BPs (SBPs) (P < 0.02). Similarly, the strongest predictors of the changes in aPWV (ΔaPWV) were the changes in mean 24-hour ambulatory SBPs (P < 0.01) and the changes in mean clinic SBP (P < 0.001). However, none of the changes in BPV were independently associated with ΔLVMI or ΔaPWV (P > 0.05 for all).
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in mean BP levels, but not BPV, were most relevant to changes in TOD in patients with uncomplicated hypertension. Thus, from this point of view, BPV appears to have limited clinical utility in this patient population. © American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2016. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arterial stiffness; blood pressure fluctuations; blood pressure variations; heart structure; hypertension.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27076601     DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpw037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  5 in total

Review 1.  Blood pressure variability: its relevance for cardiovascular homeostasis and cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Camilla Torlasco; Martino Pengo; Grzegorz Bilo; Juan Eugenio Ochoa
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 2.  Hydration Status and Cardiovascular Function.

Authors:  Joseph C Watso; William B Farquhar
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Blood pressure variability with different measurement methods: Reliability and predictors. A proof of concept cross sectional study in elderly hypertensive hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Rosaria Del Giorno; Lorenzo Balestra; Pascal Simon Heiniger; Luca Gabutti
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Joint Modeling of Individual Trajectories, Within-Individual Variability, and a Later Outcome: Systolic Blood Pressure Through Childhood and Left Ventricular Mass in Early Adulthood.

Authors:  Richard M A Parker; George Leckie; Harvey Goldstein; Laura D Howe; Jon Heron; Alun D Hughes; David M Phillippo; Kate Tilling
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Hypertension-mediated organ damage regression associates with blood pressure variability improvement three years after successful treatment initiation in essential hypertension.

Authors:  Helen Triantafyllidi; Dimitrios Benas; Antonios Schoinas; Dionyssia Birmpa; Paraskevi Trivilou; Efthimia Varytimiadi; Dimitrios Voutsinos; Ignatios Ikonomidis
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 3.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.