Literature DB >> 27076448

Craniosynostosis and Resynostosis: Models, Imaging, and Dental Implications.

C D Hermann1, S L Hyzy2, R Olivares-Navarrete2, M Walker3, J K Williams4, B D Boyan5, Z Schwartz6.   

Abstract

Craniosynostosis occurs in approximately 1 in 2,000 children and results from the premature fusion of ≥1 cranial sutures. If left untreated, craniosynostosis can cause numerous complications as related to an increase in intracranial pressure or as a direct result from cranial deformities, or both. More than 100 known mutations may cause syndromic craniosynostosis, but the majority of cases are nonsyndromic, occurring as isolated defects. Most cases of craniosynostosis require complex cranial vault reconstruction that is associated with a high risk of morbidity. While the first operation typically has few complications, bone rapidly regrows in up to 40% of children who undergo it. This resynostosis typically requires additional surgical intervention, which can be associated with a high incidence of life-threatening complications. This article reviews work related to the dental and maxillofacial implications of craniosynostosis and discusses clinically relevant animal models related to craniosynostosis and resynostosis. In addition, information is provided on the imaging modalities used to study cranial defects in animals and humans. © International & American Associations for Dental Research 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal models; maxillofacial; osteogenesis; review; sutures; three-dimensional imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27076448     DOI: 10.1177/0022034516643315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  6 in total

1.  Macropore design of tissue engineering scaffolds regulates mesenchymal stem cell differentiation fate.

Authors:  W Benton Swanson; Maiko Omi; Zhen Zhang; Hwa Kyung Nam; Younghun Jung; Gefei Wang; Peter X Ma; Nan E Hatch; Yuji Mishina
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Stretch force guides finger-like pattern of bone formation in suture.

Authors:  Bo-Hai Wu; Xiao-Xing Kou; Ci Zhang; Yi-Mei Zhang; Zhen Cui; Xue-Dong Wang; Yan Liu; Da-Wei Liu; Yan-Heng Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evidence of Stem Cell Efficacy on Developmental and Functional Alterations in Craniofacial Diseases.

Authors:  Marco Tatullo; Gianrico Spagnuolo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Appearance or attitude: what matters to craniosynostosis patients? Association of self-esteem, depressive symptoms, and facial aesthetics in patients with sagittal and metopic synostosis.

Authors:  Anja Svalina; Emma Heikura; Tuula Savolainen; Willy Serlo; Juha-Jaakko Sinikumpu; Anna-Sofia Silvola; Niina Salokorpi
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 1.532

5.  Titania nanotube-based protein delivery system to inhibit cranial bone regeneration in Crouzon model of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Sarbin Ranjitkar; Peter J Anderson; Manpreet Bariana; John A Kaidonis; Dusan Losic
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-08-06

6.  Craniofacial characteristics and cosmetic satisfaction of patients with sagittal and metopic synostosis: a case-control study using 3D photogrammetric imaging.

Authors:  Anja Svalina; Ville Vuollo; Willy Serlo; Juha-Jaakko Sinikumpu; Anna-Sofia Silvola; Niina Salokorpi
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 1.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.