Literature DB >> 27075326

Two-Load Method for Distinguishing Between Muscle Force, Velocity, and Power-Producing Capacities.

Slobodan Jaric1.   

Abstract

It is generally accepted that muscles may have different mechanical capacities, such as those for producing high force (F), velocity (V), and power (P) outputs. Nevertheless, standard procedures for evaluation of muscle function both in research and in routine testing are typically conducted under a single mechanical condition, such as a single external load. Therefore, the observed outcomes do not allow for distinguishing between the different muscle capacities. As a result, the outcomes of most routine testing procedures are of limited informational value, whereas a number of issues debated in research have originated from arbitrarily interpreted experimental findings regarding specific muscle capacities. A solution for this problem could be based on the approximately linear and exceptionally strong F-V relationship typically observed from various functional tasks performed under different external loads. These findings allow for the 'two-load method' proposed here: the functional movement tasks (e.g., maximum jumping, cycling, running, pushing, lifting, or throwing) should be tested against just two distinctive external loads. That is, the F-V relationship determined by two pairs of the F and V data could provide the parameters depicting the maximum F (i.e., the F-intercept), V (V-intercept), and P (calculated from the product of F and V) output of the tested muscles. Therefore, the proposed two-load method applied in both research and routine testing could provide a deeper insight into the mechanical properties and function of the tested muscles and resolve a number of issues debated in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27075326      PMCID: PMC5056118          DOI: 10.1007/s40279-016-0531-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  30 in total

1.  Force-velocity relationship on a cycle ergometer and knee-extensor strength indices.

Authors:  Tarak Driss; Henry Vandewalle; Jean-Michel Le Chevalier; Hugues Monod
Journal:  Can J Appl Physiol       Date:  2002-06

2.  Direct measurement of power during one single sprint on treadmill.

Authors:  J B Morin; P Samozino; R Bonnefoy; P Edouard; A Belli
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Loaded Vertical Jumping: Force-Velocity Relationship, Work, and Power.

Authors:  Daniel Feeney; Steven J Stanhope; Thomas W Kaminski; Anthony Machi; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 1.833

4.  Application of force-velocity cycle ergometer test and vertical jump tests in the functional assessment of karate competitor.

Authors:  G Ravier; F Grappe; J D Rouillon
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Peak force and rate of force development during isometric and dynamic mid-thigh clean pulls performed at various intensities.

Authors:  Naoki Kawamori; Steven J Rossi; Blake D Justice; Erin E Haff; Emido E Pistilli; Harold S O'Bryant; Michael H Stone; G Gregory Haff
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  The relation between force and velocity in human muscle.

Authors:  D R WILKIE
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1949-12       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Effect of unloading and loading on power in simulated countermovement and squat jumps.

Authors:  Maarten F Bobbert
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Force-velocity, force-power relationships of bilateral and unilateral leg multi-joint movements in young and elderly women.

Authors:  Junichiro Yamauchi; Chizuko Mishima; Satoshi Nakayama; Naokata Ishii
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Is vertical jump height a body size-independent measure of muscle power?

Authors:  Goran Markovic; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.337

10.  Evaluation of force-velocity and power-velocity relationship of arm muscles.

Authors:  Sreten Sreckovic; Ivan Cuk; Sasa Djuric; Aleksandar Nedeljkovic; Dragan Mirkov; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.078

View more
  14 in total

1.  Assessment of the two-point method applied in field conditions for routine testing of muscle mechanical capacities in a leg cycle ergometer.

Authors:  Amador García-Ramos; Milena Zivkovic; Sasa Djuric; Nikola Majstorovic; Katarina Manovski; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Selective effects of different fatigue protocols on the function of upper body muscles assessed through the force-velocity relationship.

Authors:  Amador García-Ramos; Alejandro Torrejón; Belén Feriche; Antonio J Morales-Artacho; Alejandro Pérez-Castilla; Paulino Padial; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  A comparison between the force-velocity relationships of unloaded and sled-resisted sprinting: single vs. multiple trial methods.

Authors:  Matt R Cross; Pierre Samozino; Scott R Brown; Jean-Benoît Morin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  The Validity of the 2-Point Method for Assessing the Force-Velocity Relationship of the Knee Flexors and Knee Extensors: The Relevance of Distant Force-Velocity Testing.

Authors:  Matic Sašek; Dragan M Mirkov; Vedran Hadžić; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Muscle Force-Velocity Relationships Observed in Four Different Functional Tests.

Authors:  Milena Z Zivkovic; Sasa Djuric; Ivan Cuk; Dejan Suzovic; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Isokinetic Testing: Sensitivity of the Force-Velocity Relationship Assessed through the Two-Point Method to Discriminate between Muscle Groups and Participants' Physical Activity Levels.

Authors:  Danica Janicijevic; Olivera M Knezevic; Amador Garcia-Ramos; Danilo Cvetic; Dragan M Mirkov
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Differences in the Force Velocity Mechanical Profile and the Effectiveness of Force Application During Sprint-Acceleration Between Sprinters and Hurdlers.

Authors:  Ioannis Stavridis; Ilias Smilios; Angela Tsopanidou; Theodosia Economou; Giorgos Paradisis
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2019-09-12

8.  Using Drop Jumps and Jump Squats to Assess Eccentric and Concentric Force-Velocity Characteristics.

Authors:  Gavin L Moir; Brandon W Snyder; Chris Connaboy; Hugh S Lamont; Shala E Davis
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-24

9.  Force-Velocity Relationship in the Countermovement Jump Exercise Assessed by Different Measurement Methods.

Authors:  Amador García-Ramos; Alejandro Pérez-Castilla; Antonio J Morales-Artacho; Filipa Almeida; Paulino Padial; Juan Bonitch-Góngora; Blanca de la Fuente; Belén Feriche
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.193

10.  Force-velocity profile during vertical jump cannot be assessed using only bodyweight jump and isometric maximal voluntary contraction tasks.

Authors:  Nejc Šarabon; Žiga Kozinc; Goran Marković
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.