Literature DB >> 27075206

Nursing physical assessment for patient safety in general wards: reaching consensus on core skills.

Clint Douglas1,2, Catriona Booker3, Robyn Fox3, Carol Windsor1,2, Sonya Osborne1,2,3, Glenn Gardner1,2.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To determine consensus across acute care specialty areas on core physical assessment skills necessary for early recognition of changes in patient status in general wards.
BACKGROUND: Current approaches to physical assessment are inconsistent and have not evolved to meet increased patient and system demands. New models of nursing assessment are needed in general wards that ensure a proactive and patient safety approach.
DESIGN: A modified Delphi study.
METHODS: Focus group interviews with 150 acute care registered nurses at a large tertiary referral hospital generated a framework of core skills that were developed into a web-based survey. We then sought consensus with a panel of 35 senior acute care registered nurses following a classical Delphi approach over three rounds. Consensus was predefined as at least 80% agreement for each skill across specialty areas.
RESULTS: Content analysis of focus group transcripts identified 40 discrete core physical assessment skills. In the Delphi rounds, 16 of these were consensus validated as core skills and were conceptually aligned with the primary survey: (Airway) Assess airway patency; (Breathing) Measure respiratory rate, Evaluate work of breathing, Measure oxygen saturation; (Circulation) Palpate pulse rate and rhythm, Measure blood pressure by auscultation, Assess urine output; (Disability) Assess level of consciousness, Evaluate speech, Assess for pain; (Exposure) Measure body temperature, Inspect skin integrity, Inspect and palpate skin for signs of pressure injury, Observe any wounds, dressings, drains and invasive lines, Observe ability to transfer and mobilise, Assess bowel movements.
CONCLUSIONS: Among a large and diverse group of experienced acute care registered nurses consensus was achieved on a structured core physical assessment to detect early changes in patient status. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Although further research is needed to refine the model, clinical application should promote systematic assessment and clinical reasoning at the bedside.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delphi method; clinical deterioration; early recognition; general wards; nurse surveillance; nursing assessment; patient assessment; patient observations; patient safety; physical assessment skills

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27075206     DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  6 in total

1.  The value of a redesigned clinical course during COVID-19 pandemic: an explorative convergent mixed-methods study.

Authors:  H Ösp Egilsdottir; Lena Günterberg Heyn; Espen Andreas Brembo; Kirsten Røland Byermoen; Anne Moen; Hilde Eide
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-04-24

2.  Physical assessment by Japanese community hospital nurses compared to that performed overseas: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Satoko Maejima; Ryuichi Ohta
Journal:  J Gen Fam Med       Date:  2018-12-21

3.  Improving Physical Assessment and Clinical Judgment Skills without Increasing Content in a Prelicensure Nursing Health Assessment Course.

Authors:  Kathryn Kinyon; Shannon D'Alton; Kristen Poston; Sarah Navarrete
Journal:  Nurs Rep       Date:  2021-08-02

4.  Barriers of physical assessment skills among nursing students in Arab Peninsula.

Authors:  Majed Sulaiman Alamri; Joseph U Almazan
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2018 May-Jun

5.  The Relationship between Patient Safety Climate and Medical Error Reporting Rate among Iranian Hospitals Using a Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Mostefa Shahabinejad; Hadi Khoshab; Kazem Najafr; Aboutalem Haghshenas
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2020-05

6.  Use of Standardized and Non-Standardized Tools for Measuring the Risk of Falls and Independence in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Jan Neugebauer; Valérie Tóthová; Jitka Doležalová
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.