Literature DB >> 27075028

Electronic consultation systems: worldwide prevalence and their impact on patient care-a systematic review.

Clare Liddy1, Paul Drosinis2, Erin Keely3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many health organizations are exploring the potential of electronic consultation (eConsult) services to address excessive wait times for specialist care.
OBJECTIVE: To understand the effectiveness, population impact and costs associated with implementation of eConsult services.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review using a narrative synthesis approach. We searched Medline and Embase from inception to August 2014 (English/French). Included studies focused on communication between primary care providers and specialist physicians through an asynchronous, directed communication over a secure electronic medium. We assessed study quality with a modified version of the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. We synthesized the results using the Triple Aim framework.
RESULTS: A total of 36 studies were included. Most were set in the USA and focused on single-specialty services (most commonly dermatology). Population health outcomes included patient populations, adoption/utilization and provider attitudes. Providers cited timely advice from specialists, good medical care, confirmation of diagnoses and educational benefits. No clinical outcomes were reported. Patient experience of care was generally positive, with quick specialist response times (4.6 hours to 3.9 days), avoided referrals (12-84%) and satisfaction ranging from 78% to 93%. System costs were reported in only seven studies using different outcome measures and settings, limiting comparability.
CONCLUSION: Though eConsult systems are highly acceptable for patients and providers and deliver improved access to specialist advice, gaps remain regarding eConsult's impact on population health and system costs. To achieve optimized health system performance, eConsult services must include specialty services as determined by community needs and further explore cost-effectiveness.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Access to care; eConsult; electronic consultation; primary care; referral; wait times.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27075028     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmw024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  47 in total

1.  Comparing Patients' Experiences with Electronic and Traditional Consultation: Results from a Multisite Survey.

Authors:  Sara L Ackerman; Nathaniel Gleason; Scott A Shipman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Electronic Consultations (eConsults) for Safe and Equitable Coordination of Virtual Outpatient Specialty Care.

Authors:  Michelle S Lee; Vinod E Nambudiri
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Understanding the Potential for Patient Engagement in Electronic Consultation and Referral Systems: Lessons From One Safety Net System.

Authors:  Jacqueline Nwando Olayiwola; Margae Knox; Kate Dubé; Emily Chen-Yuan Lu; Tem Woldeyesus; Iguehi E James; Rachel Willard-Grace; Delphine Tuot
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Sustainability of a Primary Care-Driven eConsult Service.

Authors:  Clare Liddy; Isabella Moroz; Amir Afkham; Erin Keely
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Primary Care Clinician Adherence to Specialist Advice in Electronic Consultation.

Authors:  Gwen de Man; Isabella Moroz; Jay Mercer; Erin Keely; Clare Liddy
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Implementing an Opt-in eConsult Program at Seven Academic Medical Centers: a Qualitative Analysis of Primary Care Provider Experiences.

Authors:  Stefanie A Deeds; Kimberly J Dowdell; Lisa D Chew; Sara L Ackerman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Patients Assess an eConsult Model's Acceptability at 5 US Academic Medical Centers.

Authors:  Sara L Ackerman; Kim Dowdell; Karl T Clebak; Meagban Quinn; Scott A Shipman
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  A pilot eConsultation service in Eastern Ontario: bridging clinical genetics and primary care.

Authors:  Priya T Bhola; Clare Liddy; Amir Afkham; Erin Keely; Gail E Graham
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  The role of family physicians in cancer care: perspectives of primary and specialty care providers.

Authors:  J Easley; B Miedema; M A O'Brien; J Carroll; D Manca; F Webster; E Grunfeld
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Primary Care Practitioners' Perceptions of Electronic Consult Systems: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Michelle S Lee; Kristin N Ray; Ateev Mehrotra; Paul Giboney; Hal F Yee; Michael L Barnett
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.