Literature DB >> 2707460

A prospective study of prognostic factors in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.

E G Hughes1, C King, E C Wood.   

Abstract

Multiple factors influence the outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). This prospective study was designed to assess their relative importance, in order to improve prognostic ability and treatment success. Prior to IVF-ET, couples were divided into "good" (GP) and "poor" (PP) prognosis groups according to female age, semen quality, previous response to stimulation, and embryo quality. The data obtained from 716 consecutive treatment cycles then were evaluated using univariate statistics and logistic regression, a technique designed to assess the relative contribution of significant factors. The pregnancy rate per GP cycle was 14.7%, compared with 5.4% per PP cycle (chi 1(2) = 12.7, P less than 0.001). The most important prognostic factors were female age, the pregnancy rate showing a linear decline after the age of 25, and previous failed fertilization due to abnormal sperm. The rate of pregnancy also declined after 14 or more follicles were aspirated and/or nine oocytes were retrieved. A formula for the probability of pregnancy, derived from the logistic regression, provides patients with a more accurate prognosis before treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2707460     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60676-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  9 in total

1.  Confounding variables affecting in vitro fertilization success: a decade of experience.

Authors:  M Alsalili; A A Yuzpe; I S Tummon; J Parker; J S Martin; J A Nisker; S A Daniel
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Clinical factors for successful cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer.

Authors:  I Kondo; N Suganuma; T Ando; Y Asada; M Furuhashi; Y Tomoda
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Cycle characteristics and outcome in relation to ovarian response during in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  M R Fluker; C K Siu; J Gunby; S Daya
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Basal serum pituitary hormone levels and outcome of in vitro fertilization utilizing a flare nasal gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and fixed low-dose follicle-stimulating hormone/human menopausal gonadotropin regimen.

Authors:  Y F Chan; P C Ho; W W So; W S Yeung
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Advances in the evaluation and treatment of the infertile man.

Authors:  E D Kim; L I Lipshultz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Reproductive performance of patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection with 100% implantation rate.

Authors:  A Raziel; S Friedler; D Strassburger; D Komarovsky; E Kasterstein; R Ron-el
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Multivariate analysis of factors predictive of successful live births in in vitro fertilization (IVF) suggests strategies to improve IVF outcome.

Authors:  D Minaretzis; D Harris; M M Alper; J F Mortola; M J Berger; D Power
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Prediction models in in vitro fertilization; where are we? A mini review.

Authors:  Laura van Loendersloot; S Repping; P M M Bossuyt; F van der Veen; M van Wely
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 10.479

Review 9.  Models Predicting Success of Infertility Treatment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alireza Zarinara; Hojjat Zeraati; Koorosh Kamali; Kazem Mohammad; Parisa Shahnazari; Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.