Literature DB >> 27074424

Imaging of Scaphoid Fractures According to the New S3 Guidelines.

R Schmitt1, H Rosenthal2.   

Abstract

Up to 30 % of acute scaphoid fractures are missed in conventional radiography. CT and MRI should be early performed in the diagnostic workflow, when radiograms (dorsopalmar, lateral and Stecher's views) are negative or inconclusive in fracture detection. Significance of CT is different from that of MRI: Sensitivity of CT imaging (85 to 95 %) is superior to conventional radiography (about 70 %), but inferior to MRI (almost 100 %). However, CT (specificity 95 to 100 %) is able to provide more detailed anatomic information of the fracture pattern when compared to MRI (specificity 80 to 90 %). Particularly, differentiation of bone contusion ("bone bruise") and non-displaced fracture can be difficult in MRI. Thus, CT indication is not only given for fracture detection, but also for assessing the morphology in scaphoid fractures (localization, fragment dislocation, comminuted zones) and the fragment instability, too. MRI should be limited to equivocal trauma cases presenting pain in the snuff box, but with inconclusive CT findings. In CT and MRI of scaphoid fractures, image display must be aligned along the longitudinal extension of the scaphoid, either by acquiring or reformatting oblique-sagittal and oblique-coronal planes. Key points • Radiography can be limited to the dorsopalmar, lateral and Stecher's views in scaphoid fractures.• In CT and MR imaging, the dedicated anatomy of the scaphoid has to be covered with oblique-sagittal and oblique-coronal images.• CT provides most detailed information of scaphoid fractures (localization, fragment dislocation and instability pattern). However, its capability in detecting non-displaced fractures is inferior to MRI.• All scaphoid fractures are seen in MRI. But differentiation of bone contusion (bone bruise) and a non-displaced fracture can be crucial.• This order is recommended in the diagnostic algorithm of scaphoid fractures: 1. radiography, 2. CT, and 3. MRI. Citation Format: • Schmitt R, Rosenthal H. Imaging of Scaphoid Fractures According to the New S3 Guidelines. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2016; 188: 459 - 469. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27074424     DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-104660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  5 in total

1.  Scaphoid Fracture Detection by Using Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Tai-Hua Yang; Ming-Huwi Horng; Rong-Shiang Li; Yung-Nien Sun
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 2.  [Advances in diagnosis and treatment of acute scaphoid fractures].

Authors:  Chenguang Yang; Liang Chen; Shaonan Hu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-04-15

Review 3.  Wrist Trauma: More Than Bones.

Authors:  Maryam Shahabpour; Wiem Abid; Luc Van Overstraeten; Michel De Maeseneer
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 1.894

Review 4.  What is the role of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of scaphoid fractures?

Authors:  Andrés Felipe Herrera Ortiz; Stephani Zoe Guevara; Sandra Milena Ramírez; Julian Cubillos Rojas; Rubén Giraldo Malo; Lorena Fernández Beaujon; María Mónica Ochoa; Juan Felipe Zarate; María Fernanda Niño; Manuela Ochoa Aguilar
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2021-05-23

5.  Correlation of CT imaging and histology to guide bone graft selection in scaphoid non-union surgery.

Authors:  Gernot Schmidle; Hannes Leonhard Ebner; Andrea Sabine Klauser; Josef Fritz; Rohit Arora; Markus Gabl
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.067

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.